sheblue wrote:what do we want sagna for, why not just sort Richards out, much better option.
We will need to employ a personal physio for him, unlike Sagna, who is pretty solid and injury free.
sheblue wrote:what do we want sagna for, why not just sort Richards out, much better option.
MilnersJaw wrote:i hope we stay clear of sagna.
zabba needs back up. however, there are far more cheaper options than a 31 year old wanting 100k to 150k a week. we shouldn't be paying them kind of wages for someone to play back up, especially since zabba doesn't even earn that.
blues2win wrote:Richards wants to leave so the club have moved on. Let's face it Micah's had a shocking injury record over the last two seasons. Also the club clearly wanted someone who could fill in across the back four and Sagna fits the bill nicely. Mail online running that the scum have failed to interrupt our bid and things should move very quickly. I wouldn't pay any attention to the 150000 figure but 100,000 seems likely plus bonuses.
Wonderwall wrote:sheblue wrote:what do we want sagna for, why not just sort Richards out, much better option.
We will need to employ a personal physio for him, unlike Sagna, who is pretty solid and injury free.
sheblue wrote:
Yes he has a bad run of injuries, but IF he can be fit he is still a better option than a 31 year old looking for a end of career pay day.
I wouldn't be too hasty to just write him off. To be fair we should give Richards more time. Important part of the title winning side two seasons ago.
Football fans forget very quickly.
Nigels Tackle wrote:sagna's basic will be in the 70-90k range
like the other new signings this will be topped up with incentive compensation
oh and he'll pick up a whacking great signing on bonus
add all of those together and divide by the length of his contract and you might get close to £150k/wk
arsenal fans make me laugh
sagna is a mercenary and the system is a joke
but...
it was ok when they were smashing salary records when they signed sol campbell
Wonderwall wrote:sheblue wrote:
Yes he has a bad run of injuries, but IF he can be fit he is still a better option than a 31 year old looking for a end of career pay day.
I wouldn't be too hasty to just write him off. To be fair we should give Richards more time. Important part of the title winning side two seasons ago.
Football fans forget very quickly.
I dont forget and have allowed room for sentimentality (2 yrs). How long before you say he has had long enough? Plus when fit, he isnt the greatest.
sheblue wrote:Wonderwall wrote:sheblue wrote:
Yes he has a bad run of injuries, but IF he can be fit he is still a better option than a 31 year old looking for a end of career pay day.
I wouldn't be too hasty to just write him off. To be fair we should give Richards more time. Important part of the title winning side two seasons ago.
Football fans forget very quickly.
I dont forget and have allowed room for sentimentality (2 yrs). How long before you say he has had long enough? Plus when fit, he isnt the greatest.
Another season.
Ted Hughes wrote:sheblue wrote:Wonderwall wrote:sheblue wrote:
Yes he has a bad run of injuries, but IF he can be fit he is still a better option than a 31 year old looking for a end of career pay day.
I wouldn't be too hasty to just write him off. To be fair we should give Richards more time. Important part of the title winning side two seasons ago.
Football fans forget very quickly.
I dont forget and have allowed room for sentimentality (2 yrs). How long before you say he has had long enough? Plus when fit, he isnt the greatest.
Another season.
But it appears he doesn't want one.
sheblue wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:sheblue wrote:Wonderwall wrote:sheblue wrote:
Yes he has a bad run of injuries, but IF he can be fit he is still a better option than a 31 year old looking for a end of career pay day.
I wouldn't be too hasty to just write him off. To be fair we should give Richards more time. Important part of the title winning side two seasons ago.
Football fans forget very quickly.
I dont forget and have allowed room for sentimentality (2 yrs). How long before you say he has had long enough? Plus when fit, he isnt the greatest.
Another season.
But it appears he doesn't want one.
Yes that may well be correct and if he wants to go, well let him go.
But Sagna. cant see him bringing a lot to the table.
this is what it boils down to, we all love Micah but when called upon he has just not been fit enough or good enough to fill in for zabba. If he wants to leave, let him go. Sagna will do the job of filling in at the back line fine.john@staustell wrote: I think it's a great short-term cover. With Richards always injured there's no way we would've won any trophy if Zabaleta was injured. Simple fact, simple answer.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: C & C, Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, Hazy2, Majestic-12 [Bot], Paul68, stupot and 228 guests