Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Found guilty

Postby Swales4ever » Tue Sep 29, 2026 4:24 pm

salford city wrote:Did not take long for the PL to confirm us guilty as charged.

and still no punishment cleared, nor what charge was rejected.
I get the confidentiality but the drums will continue beating like Bonham in acid.

1. "unintelligible language"
2. "ACID QUEEN"
3. "never once fails to turn a football thread into a himseelf thread"
4. "thumbs stalker often resulting in repetitive thumb strain"
5. ignore the cunt. he's on permantent wum mission. only TIDs may know City

You'd need to make a very good psychiatrist in order to guess what next in a eight yrs long line of hatred...


In Roger Ailes/Donnie Drumpf's words: "don't know it for a fact, but many people say so..."
there must be some truth, then!
User avatar
Swales4ever
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7248
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:18 am
Location: On the Edge of Insanity
Supporter of: Sharia for Spafia
My favourite player is: an intelligent one

Re: Found guilty

Postby sharkey » Tue Sep 29, 2026 4:28 pm

Official statement from premier league.... Does not make great reading:


Premier League Statement: Manchester City FC
Premier League statement
29 Sep 2026

An independent Commission has found Manchester City FC guilty of all charges related to serious breaches of the Premier League’s financial rules over a nine-season period, and the majority of charges in relation to its failure to co-operate with the League’s investigation.

The independent Commission found that between Seasons 2009/10 and 2017/18:
- Manchester City arranged ‘sham’ contracts (which misrepresented the true agreement between the parties) with a number of its commercial partners, as well as relying on ‘sham’ agreements with others, to artificially inflate the club’s revenues and reduce its costs
- The club filed misstated accounts and concealed the true state of its finances from its auditors and football regulators
- Manchester City was significantly in breach of both the Premier League’s and UEFA’s spending limits
- During the Premier League’s investigation, Manchester City committed multiple breaches of its duties of co-operation and utmost good faith towards the League (three of the four alleged breaches were upheld)

The independent Commission found that Manchester City arranged ‘sham’ commercial deals with a number of its sponsors during the period, which were part of a disguised funding scheme, whereby those companies were only required to pay a portion of the relevant sponsorship fees. The remainder was funded by Abu Dhabi United Group Investment & Development Ltd (ADUG), which owned the club. As part of the scheme, further ‘sham’ arrangements, funded by ADUG, were entered into to enable the club to record lower operating expenses than it actually incurred, as well as a ‘sham’ circular arrangement with Fordham, an entity that purchased the club’s players’ image rights, that was funded by ADUG.

The purpose of these schemes was found to have been to artificially inflate the club’s revenues, and reduce its costs, by more than £900 million during the affected period, to appear to comply with financial rules. The consequence of this, as the Commission found, was that the club filed misstated accounts and concealed the true state of its finances from its auditors and football regulators. The Commission concluded that ‘by its conduct the club clearly intended to circumvent the PL Rules‘.

As a result, Manchester City failed to accurately report its income and expenditure for the purposes of the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Rules and UEFA’s Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Rules. The Commission found that, had all of the relevant agreements been reported accurately in the club’s accounts, it would have been in breach of both the League’s and UEFA’s spending limits by a very substantial amount.

In addition, during the course of the four-year investigation conducted by the Premier League, the club committed multiple breaches of its duties of co-operation and utmost good faith towards the League. The Commission concluded that the club had ‘made concerted efforts to stop and frustrate the PL investigation’.

Richard Masters, Chief Executive of the Premier League, said: “The core decision establishes the facts of what happened at Manchester City during this period. It details how the club systematically broke Premier League Rules for nearly a decade.

“It also vindicates the Premier League’s decision to pursue this case against Manchester City. While the process to date has been both long and difficult, the League has remained determined that the facts be established independently.

“It is a key responsibility of the Premier League to ensure that the Rules, approved by the clubs themselves, are upheld to protect the integrity of the competition. It is paramount that the League remains competitive and fair for all clubs and for the fans. We take that role extremely seriously.

“This disciplinary case, and this decision, are the most significant in Premier League history. There are elements of the case that remain to be decided, including, importantly, what sanction must follow for these breaches. Now we have the Commission’s decision, we are committed to moving swiftly through the remainder of the process, to provide certainty for the League, our clubs and fans.”

The independent Commission’s findings are set out in a Core Decision, of which a redacted version has been published (click here). The Commission’s award comprises both the Core Decision and a large number of additional appendices, which the League is committed to publishing as soon as it is able.

The League is able to publish the Core Decision because the Commission has ruled (and an Appeal Board has confirmed) that the Commission’s decision is a ‘final award’.

Now that the charges have been proved, the issue of sanction will be addressed separately in a further hearing with the independent Commission. In accordance with Premier League rules, that hearing will remain private and confidential until such a time as publication of the outcome is permitted.

The club has the right to appeal the independent Commission’s findings and has until Friday 2 October to exercise that right.

The Premier League Board’s intention is that the full process (including any appeals and publication of relevant decisions) is concluded as soon as possible.
sharkey
Robinho's Step Over
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:08 pm

Re: Found guilty

Postby Hazy2 » Tue Sep 29, 2026 4:31 pm

salford city wrote:Did not take long for the PL to confirm us guilty as charged.


Hough end here we come !!!
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9925
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Found guilty

Postby sheblue » Tue Sep 29, 2026 4:36 pm

Club statement still defiant. If there is irrefutable evidence might be time to show it rather than talk about it.
sheblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13077
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:28 pm
Supporter of: city
My favourite player is: silva

Re: Found guilty

Postby Harry Dowd scored » Tue Sep 29, 2026 4:48 pm

Strong language from PL it don’t look good does it ?
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
Harry Dowd scored
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13096
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:01 pm
Location: Derry/Londonderry/Doire/Maiden City - Originally from Hyde Cheshire
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Found guilty

Postby john@staustell » Tue Sep 29, 2026 4:58 pm

sheblue wrote:Club statement still defiant. If there is irrefutable evidence might be time to show it rather than talk about it.


We are very good at statements. Time for action
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 21298
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: Found guilty

Postby sheblue » Tue Sep 29, 2026 4:59 pm

john@staustell wrote:
sheblue wrote:Club statement still defiant. If there is irrefutable evidence might be time to show it rather than talk about it.


We are very good at statements. Time for action


I am afraid its all just talk.
sheblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13077
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:28 pm
Supporter of: city
My favourite player is: silva

Re: Found guilty

Postby Nick » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:16 pm

Damning wording.

Put up or short up city
Nick
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10273
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 6:50 pm
Location: MANCHESTER

Re: Found guilty

Postby Swales4ever » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:17 pm

john@staustell wrote:
sheblue wrote:Club statement still defiant. If there is irrefutable evidence might be time to show it rather than talk about it.


We are very good at statements. Time for action

Understand the anger.
I am sure the Club is doing and will take all the strongest actions available and suitable.
Time frames and conditions of such proceedings can result frustrating for us fans ( me included) but I keep seeing carefully redacted actions even in those statements. Imho, it's all part of a carefully constructed action, constantly advised by the lawyers, in order to drop the bombshell at the suitable moment (be it the Arbitration stage or the High Court).
It will take time, probably long, and lot of patience from us fans.
I trust the Club and remain very confident on the final outcome.
Up the Blues and "sursum corda", mates.

1. "unintelligible language"
2. "ACID QUEEN"
3. "never once fails to turn a football thread into a himseelf thread"
4. "thumbs stalker often resulting in repetitive thumb strain"
5. ignore the cunt. he's on permantent wum mission. only TIDs may know City

You'd need to make a very good psychiatrist in order to guess what next in a eight yrs long line of hatred...


In Roger Ailes/Donnie Drumpf's words: "don't know it for a fact, but many people say so..."
there must be some truth, then!
User avatar
Swales4ever
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7248
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:18 am
Location: On the Edge of Insanity
Supporter of: Sharia for Spafia
My favourite player is: an intelligent one

Re: Found guilty

Postby craigmcfc » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:23 pm

It's gonna take one hell of an appeal to go from a 900 million fraud to not guilty
craigmcfc
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10858
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:39 am
Location: Halifax
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Sergio Aguero

Re: Found guilty

Postby salford city » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:37 pm

craigmcfc wrote:It's gonna take one hell of an appeal to go from a 900 million fraud to not guilty


The figures don't make great reading. The beeb are loving this.
Well, we now know what the PL have on the table, what have we got in our 'irrefutable evidence' drawer. I hope it is on camera and suitable to be shown in a court of law. Loving the 'sham' contracts - that could prove to be embarassing for one side or the other. You would like to think we are a tad smarter than that but that's a fucking big statementfor the PL to make without backing it up.
Your job is cleaning boots
salford city
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6997
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Re: Found guilty

Postby mr_nool » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:39 pm

Harry Dowd scored wrote:
sheblue wrote:
Harry Dowd scored wrote:Fuck me Tony Pulis now saying Stoke should have the FA cup awarded to them because we cheated them out of it. You really couldn’t make this shit up.


Cant recall narky Tony ever saying anything even remotely positive about us, not at all bitter over the play off is he.

It's because we beat them in the Cup final he thinks it should be awarded to Stoke because we cheated


As if they would've besten the Rags in the final ...
Intelligent Vigilant Person
User avatar
mr_nool
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 26688
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:48 am
Location: Utrecht

Re: Found guilty

Postby mr_nool » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:43 pm

Paul68 wrote:
Swales4ever wrote:Today I woke up thinking of this whole shit (as I do almost every day since it broke).
Now, please pay attention for a moment to my background: I was breed by a family who cherished the British civilisation as the benchmark, the pinnacle of western values (and I can now ear most of you laughing at this strange kind of weirdo).Then I came to England, first as a teenager making small jobs and learning the language. Later as a postgraduate student and working inside the marine insurance business. There I saw you are normal human beings but still embodied with remarkable traits, like respect for the rules, appreciative of cool understatement, and several others which I respect the most.

Now, after the initial moment where my proud, confrontational nature prevailed, the more I digest all this hysterical mob lynch, the most I feel shocked and astonished, mainly thinking about the neutrals.
And I am perfectly aware of how passionate you Englishmen are about your football, and how intertwined clubs are with the communities.
STILL, WTF, let's assume for a moment that City's directors are actually guilty as charged, still what the actual fock, they are not serial rapists of children!!!
I mean, such level of hatred is unprecedented since the Nazies were bombing England every day! It's unreal, and Carl says above how is it possible that none, amongst normal people, does realise that is only matter of time, before something dramatically outrageous happens!

And please do not reply with clichés like broken England and nonsense like that.
outraged rant over.


It's built into the British psyche to be fucking insanely jealous of anyone having more/better than you - we love a winner - until they make lots of money - then it hate filled rants .... we're fucking weird mate..... City - people were glad when we stopped the red cunts winning the prem.... then as we got more and more trophies and with them the money... now everyone hates us....


"We hate it when our friends become successful. And of they're Northern it makes it even worse."
Intelligent Vigilant Person
User avatar
mr_nool
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 26688
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:48 am
Location: Utrecht

Re: Found guilty

Postby john@staustell » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:47 pm

Swales4ever wrote:
john@staustell wrote:
sheblue wrote:Club statement still defiant. If there is irrefutable evidence might be time to show it rather than talk about it.


We are very good at statements. Time for action

Understand the anger.
I am sure the Club is doing and will take all the strongest actions available and suitable.
Time frames and conditions of such proceedings can result frustrating for us fans ( me included) but I keep seeing carefully redacted actions even in those statements. Imho, it's all part of a carefully constructed action, constantly advised by the lawyers, in order to drop the bombshell at the suitable moment (be it the Arbitration stage or the High Court).
It will take time, probably long, and lot of patience from us fans.
I trust the Club and remain very confident on the final outcome.
Up the Blues and "sursum corda", mates.


They could drop the bombshell now and save a lot of bother?
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 21298
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: Found guilty

Postby bigblue » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:47 pm

craigmcfc wrote:It's gonna take one hell of an appeal to go from a 900 million fraud to not guilty


The hopeful side of me thinks the PL has massively fucked up by framing it as a 900m fraud. That is an unbelievably high number, which just demonstrates how malicious their process has been. Thats approaching the level of FTX/Madoff level fraud, and it would be absurd to have this accusation with no accompanying statements from government offices.
User avatar
bigblue
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11679
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:11 pm
Supporter of: Manchester's Only
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: Found guilty

Postby Hazy2 » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:49 pm

salford city wrote:
craigmcfc wrote:It's gonna take one hell of an appeal to go from a 900 million fraud to not guilty


The figures don't make great reading. The beeb are loving this.
Well, we now know what the PL have on the table, what have we got in our 'irrefutable evidence' drawer. I hope it is on camera and suitable to be shown in a court of law. Loving the 'sham' contracts - that could prove to be embarassing for one side or the other. You would like to think we are a tad smarter than that but that's a fucking big statementfor the PL to make without backing it up.



Well effective of today we know what we are appealing
a position I think we knew was coming! Time to get swinging city!! The KC looks to have a damage limitation job.
Where does this leave our Chairman He’s a big boy on the global stage???
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9925
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Found guilty

Postby Wooders » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:50 pm

900 million is a huge number for to have taken 3 years to decide it was fraudulent, it would have stood out like a sore thumb surely?
This is all rather strange.

Anyway if this sticks we are absolutely fucked.
Citys new Motto "To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women"
Wooders
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15772
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: UK
Supporter of: City

Re: Found guilty

Postby edge275 » Tue Sep 29, 2026 5:56 pm

I can't explain why, but I have a feeling Khaldoon and co. have laid a trap in which the PL have walked right into.
"Like all bullies, they've just found out that there is a much bigger guy in town, someone who is richer and more powerful than their worst nightmare. And this smiling Arabic assassin is intent on stealing all the treasures they've nicked off everyone else, and pulverising them into commercial and footballing oblivion as he does so."
User avatar
edge275
pot noodle style supporter
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5676
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 3:43 am
Supporter of: Manchester City

Re: Found guilty

Postby Wooders » Tue Sep 29, 2026 6:02 pm

edge275 wrote:I can't explain why, but I have a feeling Khaldoon and co. have laid a trap in which the PL have walked right into.


Let’s hope so, but life ain’t breaking bad unfortunately
Citys new Motto "To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women"
Wooders
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15772
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: UK
Supporter of: City

Re: Found guilty

Postby PeterParker » Tue Sep 29, 2026 6:06 pm

Either way, this will go on for years.
And in those years we will hear non stop about the 900 mil fraud and we are cheaters.

I believe in the club, I really do, but I really think they are playing the better person in a whorehouse. And ultimately, us, the fans, will suffer in these years. Because there will be abuse from cunts who listen to Aghbonlahor and other twats. There will be bitter digs all around the world and these years will be quite a challenge.
Image
User avatar
PeterParker
Agueroooo's 93:20 League Winner
 
Posts: 24521
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:36 pm
Location: Bucharest
Supporter of: The Blue Moon blues
My favourite player is: King Mike

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], salford city, Sparklehorse, Woodyblue and 734 guests