***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby PeterParker » Sun Feb 08, 2026 7:51 pm

sheblue wrote:Great win, wasn't really expecting it.
Guehi is brilliant.


Donna and Guehi are big game players.
Image
User avatar
PeterParker
Agueroooo's 93:20 League Winner
 
Posts: 24247
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:36 pm
Location: Bucharest
Supporter of: The Blue Moon blues
My favourite player is: King Mike

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby PeterParker » Sun Feb 08, 2026 7:53 pm

Watched the Sky Sports highilights while listening to You'll Never Walk Alone on youtube.
Brilliant feeling.
Image
User avatar
PeterParker
Agueroooo's 93:20 League Winner
 
Posts: 24247
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:36 pm
Location: Bucharest
Supporter of: The Blue Moon blues
My favourite player is: King Mike

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Indianablue » Sun Feb 08, 2026 7:54 pm

Bluemoon4610 wrote:
Indianablue wrote:
Mase wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Mase wrote:Some of you owe Pep and Haalsnd an apology


They have all crawled back under their rocks mate..fuckign negative bastards !


They ruin it on here for everyone and they're the reason why so many people leave mate

Haaland produced, finally, but Liverpool should have been 3 nil before we scored. Our second half was poor compardd to the first but that was the first time this season we came back and fought our way to a win. Should have been 3-1 if not for another poor decision

Murderers expected goals for the whole game was 1.21. Why do you think they should have been 3 up?

They missed 2 great chances which 9/10 they would have scored from, they were dominating with 70% of the possession when they scored. We didnt produce anything of not up to that point in the second half.
Why look at the whole game stat. We dominated first half but didnt score. A rare event in recent times for us to come back like we did. Even rarer at Anfield.
Indianablue
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3615
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:36 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Francis Lee

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Sparklehorse » Sun Feb 08, 2026 7:55 pm

What should have happened for the third goal was that Cherki should have held it a bit longer and played Haaland through. Air Nouri had a simple pass 3 on 1 and went for it himself and he did the same against spuds. We need to sharpen our decision making and it would have been easier. That said, we held on and were deserved winners in the end. A win v Fulham on Weds and I’ll be happy. The Arsenal with a tricky away tie against Brentford. Things could be very sweet come next weekend.
"Its better to be thought of as being a fool and remain silent than to speak up and remove all doubt" - Abraham Lincoln
Sparklehorse
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1888
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:13 pm
Location: Swansea
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: All of them

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby CTID Hants » Sun Feb 08, 2026 8:11 pm

PeterParker wrote:Watched the Sky Sports highilights while listening to You'll Never Walk Alone on youtube.
Brilliant feeling.


Is that their version of arsenalfans? Might have to take a look if it is
Born A Blue

Image
User avatar
CTID Hants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15276
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: Farnborough, Hampshire

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Bluemoon4610 » Sun Feb 08, 2026 9:20 pm

Sparklehorse wrote:What should have happened for the third goal was that Cherki should have held it a bit longer and played Haaland through. Air Nouri had a simple pass 3 on 1 and went for it himself and he did the same against spuds. We need to sharpen our decision making and it would have been easier. That said, we held on and were deserved winners in the end. A win v Fulham on Weds and I’ll be happy. The Arsenal with a tricky away tie against Brentford. Things could be very sweet come next weekend.


That 3rd goal would have put the dippers below Brentford into 7th place. Gutted they found an excuse to chalk it off. :evil:
Bluemoon4610
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2059
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:01 pm
Location: Block 105 or County Durham
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Father Ruben

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Hazy2 » Sun Feb 08, 2026 9:38 pm

Just back , Sunday Roast and a bottle of Red. What a day out.
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9870
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Outcast » Sun Feb 08, 2026 9:55 pm

They ruin it on here for everyone and they're the reason why so many people leave mate[/quote]
Haaland produced, finally, but Liverpool should have been 3 nil before we scored. Our second half was poor compardd to the first but that was the first time this season we came back and fought our way to a win. Should have been 3-1 if not for another poor decision[/quote]
Murderers expected goals for the whole game was 1.21. Why do you think they should have been 3 up?[/quote]
They missed 2 great chances which 9/10 they would have scored from, they were dominating with 70% of the possession when they scored. We didnt produce anything of not up to that point in the second half.
Why look at the whole game stat. We dominated first half but didnt score. A rare event in recent times for us to come back like we did. Even rarer at Anfield.[/quote]

Dont give a toss about stats and domination. We needed to win, through grit and character. We stepped up and hopefully this will kick start us into a good run.
Outcast
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:33 pm
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Pretty Boy Lee » Sun Feb 08, 2026 10:50 pm

What a fucking win. Absolute scenes and we have a little bit of belief back.

Haaland played really well and got his reward late on. I like this new plan of haunt a partner up top.

Some absolute balls on our lads to fight back too. It’s what’s been missing. Let’s hope it’s here to stay.
Tracking back is overrated.
Image
Pretty Boy Lee
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13501
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:22 am
Location: Brisbane baby!
Supporter of: City!
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby stupot » Sun Feb 08, 2026 11:21 pm

Fantastic win. Guehi is immense, what a player. Donna likewise.Another superb display from Nunes. Bernardo loves playing this lot and was class again. Great assist from Erling to him and that was a pressure penalty from the Viking.
Arsenal would have been loving that until the laat bit.
stupot
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2605
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:23 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Dubaimancityfan » Sun Feb 08, 2026 11:30 pm

Woke up to the best Monday morning news ever. The match was at 3:30 in the morning here in Sydney and with low expectations, I gave it a miss. Sweet, sweet, sweet.
Dubaimancityfan
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2392
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:15 am
Location: Sydney, Down Under
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Big Dave

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Sun Feb 08, 2026 11:38 pm

Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.

When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 33181
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Wonderwall » Sun Feb 08, 2026 11:48 pm

Thank you Bernardo, I am going to miss you so much when you leave.
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 29258
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Wonderwall » Sun Feb 08, 2026 11:48 pm

Thank you Bernardo, I am going to miss you so much when you leave.
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 29258
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Slim » Mon Feb 09, 2026 1:16 am

carl_feedthegoat wrote:Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.

When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.


He comes across like an absolute muppet all the time, I think the cartel love him because he makes us look like fucking clowns.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30618
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Slim » Mon Feb 09, 2026 1:18 am

Dubaimancityfan wrote:Woke up to the best Monday morning news ever. The match was at 3:30 in the morning here in Sydney and with low expectations, I gave it a miss. Sweet, sweet, sweet.


Watched it on demand this morning, could not miss miss it. But 12:30am on a Monday morning is a day killer.

Excellent result, should be 3-1, fucking VAR need to make sure that every game is about them don't they.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30618
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Scatman » Mon Feb 09, 2026 6:11 am

carl_feedthegoat wrote:Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.

When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.


It was rightfully ruled out though.

Joe Hart agreed on match of the day.

Perhaps Richards doesn't want to be a fan boy like Carragher and Neville. Perhaps he doesn't even like City. He's a clown yes, but why should he be biased towards City? Why should any ex player be biased towards their old team? Can't they all be professional?
Scatman
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4741
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Manchester

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby zuricity » Mon Feb 09, 2026 6:40 am

Scatman wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.

When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.


It was rightfully ruled out though.

Joe Hart agreed on match of the day.

Perhaps Richards doesn't want to be a fan boy like Carragher and Neville. Perhaps he doesn't even like City. He's a clown yes, but why should he be biased towards City? Why should any ex player be biased towards their old team? Can't they all be professional?


Then the FA has a problem with the rules. On at least two occasions in the first half, the Ref and linesman let Scouse play on when the players looked clearly offside. If a goal was scored then VAR most probably would have ruled it out. However, because no goal was scored, there was no check. The result of not putting his flag up meant that Scouse got a corner two times !

So playing the advantage must be consistent ! The Ref played on when Haarland was pulled back. By pulling him back ,zlob got the advantage to try and clear the ball. Something he would not have had anyway. However , even though Haarland held him up. There was no guarantee that a goal would not have been scored.
The ball rolled into the net. Absolutely no need to stop play. Especially when we see shirts being tugged and wrestling matches taking place at every corner.
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
zuricity
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19230
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Mon Feb 09, 2026 7:36 am

zuricity wrote:
Scatman wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.

When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.


It was rightfully ruled out though.

Joe Hart agreed on match of the day.

Perhaps Richards doesn't want to be a fan boy like Carragher and Neville. Perhaps he doesn't even like City. He's a clown yes, but why should he be biased towards City? Why should any ex player be biased towards their old team? Can't they all be professional?


Then the FA has a problem with the rules. On at least two occasions in the first half, the Ref and linesman let Scouse play on when the players looked clearly offside. If a goal was scored then VAR most probably would have ruled it out. However, because no goal was scored, there was no check. The result of not putting his flag up meant that Scouse got a corner two times !

So playing the advantage must be consistent ! The Ref played on when Haarland was pulled back. By pulling him back ,zlob got the advantage to try and clear the ball. Something he would not have had anyway. However , even though Haarland held him up. There was no guarantee that a goal would not have been scored.
The ball rolled into the net. Absolutely no need to stop play. Especially when we see shirts being tugged and wrestling matches taking place at every corner.


You basically saved me the trouble of responding.
Last edited by carl_feedthegoat on Mon Feb 09, 2026 7:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 33181
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: ***Dippers v City Official Match Thread***

Postby Scatman » Mon Feb 09, 2026 7:36 am

zuricity wrote:
Scatman wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.

When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.


It was rightfully ruled out though.

Joe Hart agreed on match of the day.

Perhaps Richards doesn't want to be a fan boy like Carragher and Neville. Perhaps he doesn't even like City. He's a clown yes, but why should he be biased towards City? Why should any ex player be biased towards their old team? Can't they all be professional?


Then the FA has a problem with the rules. On at least two occasions in the first half, the Ref and linesman let Scouse play on when the players looked clearly offside. If a goal was scored then VAR most probably would have ruled it out. However, because no goal was scored, there was no check. The result of not putting his flag up meant that Scouse got a corner two times !

So playing the advantage must be consistent ! The Ref played on when Haarland was pulled back. By pulling him back ,zlob got the advantage to try and clear the ball. Something he would not have had anyway. However , even though Haarland held him up. There was no guarantee that a goal would not have been scored.
The ball rolled into the net. Absolutely no need to stop play. Especially when we see shirts being tugged and wrestling matches taking place at every corner.


Were the Liverpool players offside or just in offside positions? If they didn't become active (etc) then the lino is correct to not raise his flag isn't he? But if they became active they 100% should be flagged offside. I have noticed the same and it is baffling. Indeed, didn't one of our players (most likely Stones) injuring himself covering when the linesman should have flagged?

Blob pulled him back, the ref played advantage. As soon as Haaland fouled Blob the ref was no longer permitted to play the advantage so had to call it back for the first foul. The ball had not crossed the line at that point so was rightly disallowed.
Scatman
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4741
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Manchester

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: branny, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, sidSmith, Sparklehorse, trueblue64, zuricity and 284 guests