sheblue wrote:Great win, wasn't really expecting it.
Guehi is brilliant.
Donna and Guehi are big game players.
sheblue wrote:Great win, wasn't really expecting it.
Guehi is brilliant.


Bluemoon4610 wrote:Indianablue wrote:Mase wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Mase wrote:Some of you owe Pep and Haalsnd an apology
They have all crawled back under their rocks mate..fuckign negative bastards !
They ruin it on here for everyone and they're the reason why so many people leave mate
Haaland produced, finally, but Liverpool should have been 3 nil before we scored. Our second half was poor compardd to the first but that was the first time this season we came back and fought our way to a win. Should have been 3-1 if not for another poor decision
Murderers expected goals for the whole game was 1.21. Why do you think they should have been 3 up?
PeterParker wrote:Watched the Sky Sports highilights while listening to You'll Never Walk Alone on youtube.
Brilliant feeling.


Sparklehorse wrote:What should have happened for the third goal was that Cherki should have held it a bit longer and played Haaland through. Air Nouri had a simple pass 3 on 1 and went for it himself and he did the same against spuds. We need to sharpen our decision making and it would have been easier. That said, we held on and were deserved winners in the end. A win v Fulham on Weds and I’ll be happy. The Arsenal with a tricky away tie against Brentford. Things could be very sweet come next weekend.





carl_feedthegoat wrote:Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.
When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.

Dubaimancityfan wrote:Woke up to the best Monday morning news ever. The match was at 3:30 in the morning here in Sydney and with low expectations, I gave it a miss. Sweet, sweet, sweet.

carl_feedthegoat wrote:Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.
When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.
Scatman wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.
When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.
It was rightfully ruled out though.
Joe Hart agreed on match of the day.
Perhaps Richards doesn't want to be a fan boy like Carragher and Neville. Perhaps he doesn't even like City. He's a clown yes, but why should he be biased towards City? Why should any ex player be biased towards their old team? Can't they all be professional?
zuricity wrote:Scatman wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.
When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.
It was rightfully ruled out though.
Joe Hart agreed on match of the day.
Perhaps Richards doesn't want to be a fan boy like Carragher and Neville. Perhaps he doesn't even like City. He's a clown yes, but why should he be biased towards City? Why should any ex player be biased towards their old team? Can't they all be professional?
Then the FA has a problem with the rules. On at least two occasions in the first half, the Ref and linesman let Scouse play on when the players looked clearly offside. If a goal was scored then VAR most probably would have ruled it out. However, because no goal was scored, there was no check. The result of not putting his flag up meant that Scouse got a corner two times !
So playing the advantage must be consistent ! The Ref played on when Haarland was pulled back. By pulling him back ,zlob got the advantage to try and clear the ball. Something he would not have had anyway. However , even though Haarland held him up. There was no guarantee that a goal would not have been scored.
The ball rolled into the net. Absolutely no need to stop play. Especially when we see shirts being tugged and wrestling matches taking place at every corner.

zuricity wrote:Scatman wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Micah Richards said the goal was rightfully ruled out...............................Can someone get a message across to Micah Richards and tell the fuckign laughing fucking Donkey that he in no way represents Man City at all..hes a fucking nobody as far as City fans are concerned.......an ex player who was an ex shit player at that.
When you have our arch enemy Neville fighting our corner on that goal and then you have this fuckign spastic saying the opposite....I just want to smash the TV screen when his face appears on it.
It was rightfully ruled out though.
Joe Hart agreed on match of the day.
Perhaps Richards doesn't want to be a fan boy like Carragher and Neville. Perhaps he doesn't even like City. He's a clown yes, but why should he be biased towards City? Why should any ex player be biased towards their old team? Can't they all be professional?
Then the FA has a problem with the rules. On at least two occasions in the first half, the Ref and linesman let Scouse play on when the players looked clearly offside. If a goal was scored then VAR most probably would have ruled it out. However, because no goal was scored, there was no check. The result of not putting his flag up meant that Scouse got a corner two times !
So playing the advantage must be consistent ! The Ref played on when Haarland was pulled back. By pulling him back ,zlob got the advantage to try and clear the ball. Something he would not have had anyway. However , even though Haarland held him up. There was no guarantee that a goal would not have been scored.
The ball rolled into the net. Absolutely no need to stop play. Especially when we see shirts being tugged and wrestling matches taking place at every corner.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: branny, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, salford city, sidSmith, trueblue64, Woodyblue, zuricity and 285 guests