carl_feedthegoat wrote:Outcast wrote:At end of the day, you can sugar coat it as much as you like, he isn't good enough to start, we keep losing everytime he does. What he achieved in the past is irrelevant.
I can forgive him if he could produce a moment of magic even when playing shit, he isn't Messi, Tranny or even KDB
One or two fans on here think he’s temporarily off form and wasn’t as shit as most of us like to believe , one even thinks he’s only been bad for half a season !!!
2 years he’s been shit and has just about cost us the most important games when he’s played and he deserves all the slagging off that’s going his way —- baldie once again fucked up , not by just playing him but also by not even taking the little gimp off when he should have come off !!!
Defies logic.
Yesterday was CL dejavú
You can name that poster, pal, and I’ll stick by my statement. Sterling seemed to fall off a cliff around March last season. Prior to that he was still contributing towards the play and getting plenty of goals and assists. He’s one of ours and England’s most utilised players, who rarely gets a rest. I won’t go into his stats prior to this period as they speak for themselves.
The difference with Sterling compared to others is that when he has an off day then there’s a pile on. The media would have been there if he didn’t call them out so it’s left for the echo chamber every time he fluffs a chance or loses a ball.
Everybody can see that his form is poor and most would admit that he shouldn’t be an automatic first choice. However, we have to accept that the manager may want to play him back into form, which we have no choice over, and we can only hope that it kicks back in for the betterment of the team and the boards well-being
