blues2win wrote:It was not shoulder to shoulder. Nowhere near. Traore was behind him and shoved him in the back.
Slim wrote:branny wrote:Rapidly turning into our worst epl title defence by a long way.
Ummm.
Slim wrote:blues2win wrote:It was not shoulder to shoulder. Nowhere near. Traore was behind him and shoved him in the back.
Okay, for those who are saying it was in the back, you are right. And if technically it was a foul or not, again...not arguing. But refer to my previous post on the subject, this may be against the 'rules', but this is reality and this IS what happens.
It's not isolated, not just against City, it's what occurs what you shepard a ball. You need to be stronger or clear the ball. Want a foul? Put your foot on the ball and then fall over, you'll get one.
Slim wrote:blues2win wrote:It was not shoulder to shoulder. Nowhere near. Traore was behind him and shoved him in the back.
Okay, for those who are saying it was in the back, you are right. And if technically it was a foul or not, again...not arguing. But refer to my previous post on the subject, this may be against the 'rules', but this is reality and this IS what happens.
It's not isolated, not just against City, it's what occurs what you shepard a ball. You need to be stronger or clear the ball. Want a foul? Put your foot on the ball and then fall over, you'll get one.
ayrshireblue wrote:Slim wrote:blues2win wrote:It was not shoulder to shoulder. Nowhere near. Traore was behind him and shoved him in the back.
Okay, for those who are saying it was in the back, you are right. And if technically it was a foul or not, again...not arguing. But refer to my previous post on the subject, this may be against the 'rules', but this is reality and this IS what happens.
It's not isolated, not just against City, it's what occurs what you shepard a ball. You need to be stronger or clear the ball. Want a foul? Put your foot on the ball and then fall over, you'll get one.
I agree, it is one where you sometimes get the foul and sometimes don't but Atkinson gave it as a foul the next two times he done it. Consistency is all we are after and it doesn't seem any closer now.
ayrshireblue wrote:Slim wrote:blues2win wrote:It was not shoulder to shoulder. Nowhere near. Traore was behind him and shoved him in the back.
Okay, for those who are saying it was in the back, you are right. And if technically it was a foul or not, again...not arguing. But refer to my previous post on the subject, this may be against the 'rules', but this is reality and this IS what happens.
It's not isolated, not just against City, it's what occurs what you shepard a ball. You need to be stronger or clear the ball. Want a foul? Put your foot on the ball and then fall over, you'll get one.
I agree, it is one where you sometimes get the foul and sometimes don't but Atkinson gave it as a foul the next two times he done it. Consistency is all we are after and it doesn't seem any closer now.
branny wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Slim wrote:blues2win wrote:It was not shoulder to shoulder. Nowhere near. Traore was behind him and shoved him in the back.
Okay, for those who are saying it was in the back, you are right. And if technically it was a foul or not, again...not arguing. But refer to my previous post on the subject, this may be against the 'rules', but this is reality and this IS what happens.
It's not isolated, not just against City, it's what occurs what you shepard a ball. You need to be stronger or clear the ball. Want a foul? Put your foot on the ball and then fall over, you'll get one.
I agree, it is one where you sometimes get the foul and sometimes don't but Atkinson gave it as a foul the next two times he done it. Consistency is all we are after and it doesn't seem any closer now.
It shouldn't have come to that. 2-1 up with 7 1/2 minutes on the clock you don't fuck about. Row z and get back in position.
branny wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Slim wrote:blues2win wrote:It was not shoulder to shoulder. Nowhere near. Traore was behind him and shoved him in the back.
Okay, for those who are saying it was in the back, you are right. And if technically it was a foul or not, again...not arguing. But refer to my previous post on the subject, this may be against the 'rules', but this is reality and this IS what happens.
It's not isolated, not just against City, it's what occurs what you shepard a ball. You need to be stronger or clear the ball. Want a foul? Put your foot on the ball and then fall over, you'll get one.
I agree, it is one where you sometimes get the foul and sometimes don't but Atkinson gave it as a foul the next two times he done it. Consistency is all we are after and it doesn't seem any closer now.
It shouldn't have come to that. 2-1 up with 7 1/2 minutes on the clock you don't fuck about. Row z and get back in position.
zuricity wrote:Slim wrote:blues2win wrote:It was not shoulder to shoulder. Nowhere near. Traore was behind him and shoved him in the back.
Okay, for those who are saying it was in the back, you are right. And if technically it was a foul or not, again...not arguing. But refer to my previous post on the subject, this may be against the 'rules', but this is reality and this IS what happens.
It's not isolated, not just against City, it's what occurs what you shepard a ball. You need to be stronger or clear the ball. Want a foul? Put your foot on the ball and then fall over, you'll get one.
Don't be silly, putting your foot on the ball means nothing. You do not even have to be in possession of the ball for a foul to be given,
Slim wrote:zuricity wrote:Slim wrote:blues2win wrote:It was not shoulder to shoulder. Nowhere near. Traore was behind him and shoved him in the back.
Okay, for those who are saying it was in the back, you are right. And if technically it was a foul or not, again...not arguing. But refer to my previous post on the subject, this may be against the 'rules', but this is reality and this IS what happens.
It's not isolated, not just against City, it's what occurs what you shepard a ball. You need to be stronger or clear the ball. Want a foul? Put your foot on the ball and then fall over, you'll get one.
Don't be silly, putting your foot on the ball means nothing. You do not even have to be in possession of the ball for a foul to be given,
Thank you for that.
zuricity wrote:branny wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Slim wrote:blues2win wrote:It was not shoulder to shoulder. Nowhere near. Traore was behind him and shoved him in the back.
Okay, for those who are saying it was in the back, you are right. And if technically it was a foul or not, again...not arguing. But refer to my previous post on the subject, this may be against the 'rules', but this is reality and this IS what happens.
It's not isolated, not just against City, it's what occurs what you shepard a ball. You need to be stronger or clear the ball. Want a foul? Put your foot on the ball and then fall over, you'll get one.
I agree, it is one where you sometimes get the foul and sometimes don't but Atkinson gave it as a foul the next two times he done it. Consistency is all we are after and it doesn't seem any closer now.
It shouldn't have come to that. 2-1 up with 7 1/2 minutes on the clock you don't fuck about. Row z and get back in position.
this is what it boils down to, row z and time to reorganise and catch a breather .
PrezIke wrote:Nico is so gone after this season, in case you were wondering....
Simister wrote:Watch the Ederson incident on Youtube, 12 seconds in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXwru3AspFc
Its clear that Jotta edges his shoulder in to make contact with Ederson.
Isn't that exactly the kind of thing VAR was supposed to be checking for?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carolina-blue, Majestic-12 [Bot], Scatman and 81 guests