Beefymcfc wrote:I've thought that his tactics and subs have been all wrong for the last 2 games and that if wasn't for the referee (and bad defending), we'd have lost against the scum, which we did against the Toffees. Saying that, with the team he has had to pick from, he has done well.
The jury's still out for me I'm afraid.
Original Dub wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:I've thought that his tactics and subs have been all wrong for the last 2 games and that if wasn't for the referee (and bad defending), we'd have lost against the scum, which we did against the Toffees. Saying that, with the team he has had to pick from, he has done well.
The jury's still out for me I'm afraid.
That's exactly how I feel, but I got sniding comments left and underlying accusations of having an agenda when I said so.
The jury is definitely out on the man and I hope to God he comes through, starting with Wed night.
I am FULLY behind him though... of course.
Beefymcfc wrote:Feck me, have the 'No' vote atually gone up? I was sure it was on 10 the last time I looked, but now it's 22!
Was Everton and the Derby that bad?
BobKowalski wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Feck me, have the 'No' vote atually gone up? I was sure it was on 10 the last time I looked, but now it's 22!
Was Everton and the Derby that bad?
Well Everton was bad because no one turned up and the derby was...actually no that was awesome
I suspect that a lot of people are uneasy about Mancini especially when it comes to tactics, formations and 'negative' (ie Italian) attitude etc. He does like playing around with players and formations and is happy to roll the dice and gamble I mean how many would have thought Benjani or Garrido would get a look in or he would start Boyata alongside Kompany at the heart of the defence in his first derby match and a semi final at that. I bet taggart was licking his lips seeing that lineup. Yet not only did we win we actually came from behind and when was the last time we did that in a derby?
Personally I like what I see with Mancini and whilst it is far too soon to judge whether he will lead us to the promised land I already love the guy!
Original Dub wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:I've thought that his tactics and subs have been all wrong for the last 2 games and that if wasn't for the referee (and bad defending), we'd have lost against the scum, which we did against the Toffees. Saying that, with the team he has had to pick from, he has done well.
The jury's still out for me I'm afraid.
That's exactly how I feel, but I got sniding comments left and underlying accusations of having an agenda when I said so.
The jury is definitely out on the man and I hope to God he comes through, starting with Wed night.
I am FULLY behind him though... of course.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Original Dub wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:I've thought that his tactics and subs have been all wrong for the last 2 games and that if wasn't for the referee (and bad defending), we'd have lost against the scum, which we did against the Toffees. Saying that, with the team he has had to pick from, he has done well.
The jury's still out for me I'm afraid.
That's exactly how I feel, but I got sniding comments left and underlying accusations of having an agenda when I said so.
The jury is definitely out on the man and I hope to God he comes through, starting with Wed night.
I am FULLY behind him though... of course.
there was nothing snidy about 'comments'. By comments you are of course referring to me. Fucking WUM.
I agree with mister Vanishing Point, I find it hard to understand what's your point here. Lot of words without actually saying anything. 'I am behind him BUT....'. You should have balls to show your true colours and not use some weird undertones and act like some sort of victim. We already got DHTP to do that.
Then again, if you can't enjoy Derby win then I don't know what could help you.
sawfer wrote:There's no such things called MAN in Manchester City; we are a TEAM and we are AWESOME after kicking Alex Ferguson's Manchester U***d in the butt! woooohooooooooooo
http://www.sawfer.com
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:sawfer wrote:There's no such things called MAN in Manchester City; we are a TEAM and we are AWESOME after kicking Alex Ferguson's Manchester U***d in the butt! woooohooooooooooo
http://www.sawfer.com
Wow.
That was weird first post.
Scatman wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:sawfer wrote:There's no such things called MAN in Manchester City; we are a TEAM and we are AWESOME after kicking Alex Ferguson's Manchester U***d in the butt! woooohooooooooooo
http://www.sawfer.com
Wow.
That was weird first post.
What happened to the thread that new people tell us about themselves?
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Scatman wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:sawfer wrote:There's no such things called MAN in Manchester City; we are a TEAM and we are AWESOME after kicking Alex Ferguson's Manchester U***d in the butt! woooohooooooooooo
http://www.sawfer.com
Wow.
That was weird first post.
What happened to the thread that new people tell us about themselves?
I reckon this feller would have story to tell.
edge275 wrote:Its quite simple. That's his site and he's advertising it.
Original Dub wrote:I wouldn't call the carling cup on its own a good place to start... it'd be nice for supporters but reaching the top four is far more important if we are to attract the best players in the world.
Also, I said emulating Chelsea may be good enough for some, but I want to emulate U***d and they are MILES apart in terms of dominance and U***d have had more success since Abramovich took over... it didn't need to be that way, if they'd have just left Jose do his job... unfotunately, instability normally results in staggered success, rather than consistant success.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], stevefromdonny, stupot and 138 guests