Ted Hughes wrote:Martin Samuel on Wenger. Quality. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/articl ... razil.html And while we're at it Considering he thinks it is right for Manchester City to be expelled from the Champions League, sometimes it is amusing to consider what Arsene Wenger feels is fair in football. Rewarding failure, for instance. Very fair. Arsenal, his club, have not been anywhere near the Premier League trophy for 10 years now, yet are consistently seeded in Pot 1 of the Champions League draw, and have been since 2000-01. UEFA’s co-efficient system, which takes historical form into account and therefore protects the biggest and richest clubs from one ordinary season — or in Arsenal’s case, nine — will come to Wenger’s rescue again this summer. Despite having to go through another qualification play-off, providing Arsenal progress, Wenger already knows his team are among the highest seeds for 2014-15, no matter the fourth-place finish. Manchester City, the actual champions in two of the previous three seasons, will be in Pot 2, if lucky. Borussia Dortmund won the Bundesliga in 2011-12 and were placed in Pot 4. ‘Nobody has ever won the Champions League from Pot 4,’ explained Dortmund chief executive officer Hans-Joachim Watzke. Still no word from Wenger on this, so it’s probably fair. Sky-high ticket prices; also fair. This season Arsenal had the highest priced season ticket in the league (£1,955) and the top priced cheapest season ticket, too, at £985. As Arsenal play Hull City on Saturday looking for their first trophy since 2005, some might think this poor value for money. Not Wenger. No word condemns Arsenal for squeezing their public, despite the advantage of a 60,000 capacity stadium. ‘The only way we can pay the wages and compete without any external help is through the ticket prices,’ he said in January 2013. ‘It is our main income so, of course, the prices are high. It is down to every individual to decide. If you want to go to a concert tomorrow, you look at the price of a ticket and if it is too high, you say yes or no.’ This is the upmarket version of like it or lump it, really. Super fair. Manchester City, meanwhile, on the back of two titles, the FA Cup and the League Cup in the last four seasons, have the cheapest prices in the Premier League, and are even the right side of three clubs in the Conference. Wealth distribution: another area of fairness that does not set Wenger’s antennae twitching. In 2012-13, for getting eliminated at the Champions League knockout stage by the first good team they played, Arsenal pocketed £26.1million and Manchester United £29.6m. UEFA also pass a solidarity payment to the Premier League to distribute among the other 16 clubs. Last year it was £1.3m split 16 ways — or £81,250 each. Sounds fair. Certainly, there is no complaint from Wenger. ‘If you say to me tomorrow that the 20 Premier League clubs get £100m each, I’m OK, I’ll take the gamble,’ he said last week, with the air of a man who knows his real odds are £26.1m versus £81,250. The clubs in the Champions League command 79 per cent of the competition revenue, and Michel Platini, the UEFA president, says wealth redistribution is a matter for those clubs. Are Arsenal going to start giving away their fortune to create fairer domestic competitions? Is Wenger lobbying his friend Platini to engineer this great leap forward? Guess again. So, for all his much-vaunted fairness, Wenger’s take on matters that affect his club is about as impartial as Jose Mourinho’s opinion of what makes a good referee. Wenger’s sense of justice is, bottom line, whatever works for him and Arsenal. Fair’s fair.
Camebro wrote:Has anyone seen the figures for PSG's fine?
Beefymcfc wrote:Looks like we've settled to a position where it will not affect us in the least, no great Sheikh. The money we've been fined will come from the CL pot that we have already earned so won't be seen and our plans are on schedule.
More importantly, UEFA have set a precendence with us that all other clubs will have to follow. This will not affect us whereas it will pull the drawbridge up for those trying later. Although I fucking hate the thought of it, it does at least mean we are in the castle.
I'm just waiting for further sanctions from our own FFP and by the sounds of it, Scudamore might be forced out in favour of a more 'Wilko' persona that will allow the old Sky 4 to push things through.
Anyway, no harm done, the club had it and we carry on as before.
Hutch's Shoulder wrote:This is also interesting:
- The wage bill of the whole club (playing and non-playing staff) for 2014-15 will need to remain at the same level as that of 2013-14 season. It is important to note that additional bonuses for performances can be paid outside this number. Importantly, in reality, the existing MCFC business plan sees a natural decline in that wage bill.
I read somewhere that when we extended Yaya's contract we reduced his basic wage but offered performance bonuses, so it is probably the way we were going anyway.
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:Hutch's Shoulder wrote:This is also interesting:
- The wage bill of the whole club (playing and non-playing staff) for 2014-15 will need to remain at the same level as that of 2013-14 season. It is important to note that additional bonuses for performances can be paid outside this number. Importantly, in reality, the existing MCFC business plan sees a natural decline in that wage bill.
I read somewhere that when we extended Yaya's contract we reduced his basic wage but offered performance bonuses, so it is probably the way we were going anyway.
Certainly more than hints that we will be finding a way around it.
Green & Blue wrote:Fat cats at Uefa lining their own pockets.
Any ideas what kind of conditions we will be operating under as regards signing players?
Ted Hughes wrote: The Club’s expenditure on new players for the upcoming summer transfer window, on top of income from players it might sell, will be limited to 60m euros. This will have no material impact on the Club’s planned transfer activity. Not seen any mention in the statements of whether the squad restriction includes keeping 8 'homegrown' players, or whether that has been negotiated as well. If it has, then the sanction makes absolutely no difference at all.
Ted Hughes wrote: The Club’s expenditure on new players for the upcoming summer transfer window, on top of income from players it might sell, will be limited to 60m euros. This will have no material impact on the Club’s planned transfer activity. Not seen any mention in the statements of whether the squad restriction includes keeping 8 'homegrown' players, or whether that has been negotiated as well. If it has, then the sanction makes absolutely no difference at all.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, carolina-blue, Google [Bot], john@staustell, Majestic-12 [Bot], salford city, Two's Kompany and 248 guests