What Odds That The MOTD Clowns.....

[Blueboylewis]

They talked about our attacking flare and how they enjoy watching it and then they decide to rip our defense apart and criticise it and tbf, Our defense deserved it. We cant exactly say the defense has been good can we.

[irblinx]

pronounced mancini's name wrong, i reckon on purpose the childish cunt then take the same amount of time showing goals we conceded in the past as they did showing the game itself, then without even giving him a few games to see what he's going to do are already saying mancini isn't any better then hughes, i'm pretty sure i know more about football then the three of them put together the twats

TANTASTIC A** CLOWNS IS WHAT THEY ARE the three of them look like costa del sol rent boys lets see if the scum get slated for there defence as much as we did even though we actually won our match or if they will make excuses for it the dirty biassed cunts

They showed all the defensive lapses as an explanation of why Hughes had to go and whilst they started from a "isn't it bad" point of view they did clearly outline why the decision was made, all in all not bad for MoTD

[conkers]

Pretty well balanced.

[Bianchi on Ice]

Were on first!!!

That should merit immediate champions league qualification. First is first last is sky plus

[Wonderwall]

pronounced mancini's name wrong, i reckon on purpose the childish cunt then take the same amount of time showing goals we conceded in the past as they did showing the game itself, then without even giving him a few games to see what he's going to do are already saying mancini isn't any better then hughes, i'm pretty sure i know more about football then the three of them put together the twats

TANTASTIC A** CLOWNS IS WHAT THEY ARE the three of them look like costa del sol rent boys lets see if the scum get slated for there defence as much as we did even though we actually won our match or if they will make excuses for it the dirty biassed cunts

They showed all the defensive lapses as an explanation of why Hughes had to go and whilst they started from a "isn't it bad" point of view they did clearly outline why the decision was made, all in all not bad for MoTD

HMM, THEY SEEMED VERY PRO HUGHES TO ME??

[The Original Special One]

Pretty well balanced.

maybe somebody tipped them off in advance about this thread? :)

[The Original Special One]

To be fair they were reasonably fair and well-balanced.
I suppose it helped that they didn't have Shearer or 'the nodding dog' on
And that Lawro was in one of more unusually pensive and reflexive moods


On the subject of 'nodding dogs' , what is it about ex-England full backs who used to play in red shirts
(think Phil Neal: ''yes boss, three bags full boss')

[john@staustell]

Phil Thomson on SKY - what right has he to pontificate on City? Pillock.

Les has alway shad big support among former players/pundits. But they dont have the best for City at heart do they?

[Manx Blue]

I can't understand how week after week they have ripped the defence to pieces, yet hansen said hughes was close to getting it right!!!! Every week they fucking contradict themselves.

[ashton287]

pronounced mancini's name wrong, i reckon on purpose the childish cunt then take the same amount of time showing goals we conceded in the past as they did showing the game itself, then without even giving him a few games to see what he's going to do are already saying mancini isn't any better then hughes, i'm pretty sure i know more about football then the three of them put together the twats

TANTASTIC A** CLOWNS IS WHAT THEY ARE the three of them look like costa del sol rent boys lets see if the scum get slated for there defence as much as we did even though we actually won our match or if they will make excuses for it the dirty biassed cunts

They showed all the defensive lapses as an explanation of why Hughes had to go and whilst they started from a "isn't it bad" point of view they did clearly outline why the decision was made, all in all not bad for MoTD

HMM, THEY SEEMED VERY PRO HUGHES TO ME??

the game got barely any show apart from the goals and it was an awesome game i mean tevez's celebration should of got 4 mins of replays and a full blown analysis on its own, but jokes aside they were up hughes ass hanson said "i thought they were getting closer" and "the players have let HIM down" not let the club down so it's the players fault not hughes', then they said there suprised weve gone for mancini and then hanson said "will he do better then mark hughes?, probably not" <<< how is that balanced when they cant even wait for mancini to even give a press confrence stating his intentions before writing him off on probably the most popular football tv show in england, there like little kids who have decided they dont like him because he's got better trainers not balanced atall then after showing the fulham match the first thing that got said was "manchester u****d have there excuses, legitimate ones" did they say that about us after the spurs game because it was the same result and WE had defenders injured did they fuck

so i stand by my original statement

[zuricity]

pronounced mancini's name wrong, i reckon on purpose the childish cunt then take the same amount of time showing goals we conceded in the past as they did showing the game itself, then without even giving him a few games to see what he's going to do are already saying mancini isn't any better then hughes, i'm pretty sure i know more about football then the three of them put together the twats

TANTASTIC A** CLOWNS IS WHAT THEY ARE the three of them look like costa del sol rent boys lets see if the scum get slated for there defence as much as we did even though we actually won our match or if they will make excuses for it the dirty biassed cunts

Pronounced Mancini's name in Italian with a 'ch' an not 'see' , so they did get something right.

[s1ty m]

bizarrely, they were quite fair. i stille loathe them and the programme though.

even more bizarre, the f first main game made it look better than i had thought at the match. it was a great game - for a neutral.

[King Kev]

I can't understand how week after week they have ripped the defence to pieces, yet hansen said hughes was close to getting it right!!!! Every week they fucking contradict themselves.

Agreed! If leaking 9 goals in 3 games is getting close to getting it right then his idea of 'right' is quite different from mine!