Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Original Dub wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:sharkey wrote:well considering we were losing three times and we had 10 men for a long time a draw aint a bad result. we played well generally. lescott was poor. thought sylvinho was good and tevez motm
yeah, and considering we were playing relegation bound Bolton with squad worth 250m, draw is pretty fucking poor result.
Can I ask you one question and please have the courtesy to answer me...
Why, when its obvious as hell that we were robbed by the officials AGAIN do you never acknowledge it?
I thinkits because you like having a good old moan, but maybe you'd enlighten me?
ref was pretty fucking shocking today yeah, but in same way you could say that we won last week because of Micah's handball. All the poor refereeing decisions even themselves over the season. You make your own luck in this game.
However every single time we fail to win, you blame the ref. Is that because you are afraid to look at the shortcomings of our team and management?
Sister of fu wrote:I can assure you that he was booked in the centre circle as we kicked off after they had scored. Unless my eyes were decieving me after that extra strong black coffee??!!
zuricity wrote:Sister of fu wrote:I can assure you that he was booked in the centre circle as we kicked off after they had scored. Unless my eyes were decieving me after that extra strong black coffee??!!
Well Sister of Fu. There seems to be a lot of confusion about this one eh? Cos I didn't even know he had a yellow card when he was fouled. It came up on an internet site that he was booked in the first half ! ( this was during the game too !) and of course the BBC, as i pasted, show it almost 12 minutes later. Look, I'm not one of Bellamy's biggest fans at all, but all I want is fair's fair for all players and to me City and Bellamy were hard done by, by a pathetic decision from Clattenberg. Who i might add, should be removed from the PL list of referees. He is consistently bad ( not just today against City).
Buffalo Soldier wrote:zuricity wrote:Sister of fu wrote:I can assure you that he was booked in the centre circle as we kicked off after they had scored. Unless my eyes were decieving me after that extra strong black coffee??!!
Well Sister of Fu. There seems to be a lot of confusion about this one eh? Cos I didn't even know he had a yellow card when he was fouled. It came up on an internet site that he was booked in the first half ! ( this was during the game too !) and of course the BBC, as i pasted, show it almost 12 minutes later. Look, I'm not one of Bellamy's biggest fans at all, but all I want is fair's fair for all players and to me City and Bellamy were hard done by, by a pathetic decision from Clattenberg. Who i might add, should be removed from the PL list of referees. He is consistently bad ( not just today against City).
Fucking hell mate, you're like a dog with a bone. Sister of Fu was at the game and saw Bellamy get booked after the third goal and then again for the supposed dive.
The decision was dog shit. Sister of Fu's infomration is accurate. Let it go.
Blue2 wrote:CityFanFromRome wrote:mancitymark wrote:Not fucking good enough AGAIN
FUCK OFF HUGHES and take your fucking coaching team with you because you are a fucking laughing stock.
Er...did you miss the fact that we played half an hour down to ten men due to a shocking decision by the ref and that they were awarded an off-side goal? I'm not happy about drawing at Bolton, believe me, but today we were robbed by the ref, no fault of Hughes, although in his place I might have taken Kompany off earlier.
Always somebody elses fault.
CityFanFromRome wrote:LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:And let's face it, Bellamy dived.
Not really, there is clearly contact between his and the defender's leg, also why the fuck would he dive once he had already got past his man and was basically into the box?
Citeh&Crew wrote:CityFanFromRome wrote:LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:And let's face it, Bellamy dived.
Not really, there is clearly contact between his and the defender's leg, also why the fuck would he dive once he had already got past his man and was basically into the box?
Why are you trying to be logical to people like this? Don't do it man.. logic just makes the buffoons more angry.
Citeh&Crew wrote:CityFanFromRome wrote:LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:And let's face it, Bellamy dived.
Not really, there is clearly contact between his and the defender's leg, also why the fuck would he dive once he had already got past his man and was basically into the box?
Why are you trying to be logical to people like this? Don't do it man.. logic just makes the buffoons more angry.
Blueboylewis wrote:http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5767635,00.html
"Mark Hughes has expressed his delight at the manner in which Manchester City went about their business at Bolton.
The Blues left the Reebok Stadium on Saturday with only a point to show for their considerable efforts, but that represented some achievement given the way the game panned out.
Hughes' men trailed on three occasions against the plucky Trotters, but hit back each time to secure a 3-3 draw.
City's final leveller came after they had been reduced to 10 men following Craig Bellamy's sending off and Hughes was impressed by the battling spirit on show from his troops.
Asked what his overriding emotion was after a topsy-turvy contest, the Welshman told Sky Sports: "I think pride because the guys really dug in under difficult circumstances.
"Obviously we went down to 10 men, as a consequence of a laughable decision by the referee, and we were behind in the game and it was really difficult at that point but the character of the guys showed.
"It goes to show what a great group they are and they weren't to be denied. They showed character and bravery to take the fight to Bolton and deserved what they got.
"In the end we felt if anybody was going to be get a winner it was going to be us so, given the fact that we were one down in terms of personnel, I thought it was an outstanding performance."
He added: "We stuck at it. Obviously the first goal was an incorrect decision, it was miles offside, so we shouldn't have been down. The second one was a fantastic strike by the boy Cahill and the third, if they keep throwing balls in the box, there is a chance that someone is going to get on the end of one.
Frustrating
"We are looking at the game and it's frustrating because we felt we showed good pace, got the ball down and created opportunities.
"Had the circumstances been better, in terms of decisions made, I'm sure we would have won the game comfortably. I think if at any point in the game we had got our noses in front, we would have won the game for ourselves."
Hughes was unhappy at a number of decisions made by referee Mark Clattenburg, but felt the decision to dismiss Bellamy was the worst of the lot.
The Wales international was shown a second yellow card for diving, but many of those in attendance did not realise he had already been cautioned for an earlier incident - including Hughes.
"Apparently it was for dissent," he said.
"He wasn't happy with the initial award of a throw-in which led to their third goal. It was the wrong decision again; one of a number of wrong decisions the referee and his officials made today - including the first goal.
"He reacted to that, as everyone did, because it was the wrong decision and then the second booking is laughable.
"Craig's running at pace into the box, he is trying to get into an advantageous position, and the lad has come across him and clipped his heels. Craig Bellamy doesn't dive. He doesn't look for those situations, he wants to get on the end of balls and score goals, so for the referee to suggest that Bellamy conned him is laughable."
Citeh&Crew wrote:CityFanFromRome wrote:LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:And let's face it, Bellamy dived.
Not really, there is clearly contact between his and the defender's leg, also why the fuck would he dive once he had already got past his man and was basically into the box?
Why are you trying to be logical to people like this? Don't do it man.. logic just makes the buffoons more angry.
Original Dub wrote:What the FUCK is wrong with being a point off fourth with a game in hand, being in a cup semi final and unbeaten in 13 games?
Someone fucking answer me that??
CityGer wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Original Dub wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:sharkey wrote:well considering we were losing three times and we had 10 men for a long time a draw aint a bad result. we played well generally. lescott was poor. thought sylvinho was good and tevez motm
yeah, and considering we were playing relegation bound Bolton with squad worth 250m, draw is pretty fucking poor result.
Can I ask you one question and please have the courtesy to answer me...
Why, when its obvious as hell that we were robbed by the officials AGAIN do you never acknowledge it?
I thinkits because you like having a good old moan, but maybe you'd enlighten me?
ref was pretty fucking shocking today yeah, but in same way you could say that we won last week because of Micah's handball. All the poor refereeing decisions even themselves over the season. You make your own luck in this game.
However every single time we fail to win, you blame the ref. Is that because you are afraid to look at the shortcomings of our team and management?
Agreed.
Dub is a top poster but his support for Hughes is now completely blind and lacks credibility. It's as if he's on one man mission to quash any 'dissenting' voices. You can't make a post now that isn't glowingly positive without Dub turning up with his 'case for the defence'. It's really tiresome.
LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:Citeh&Crew wrote:CityFanFromRome wrote:LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:And let's face it, Bellamy dived.
Not really, there is clearly contact between his and the defender's leg, also why the fuck would he dive once he had already got past his man and was basically into the box?
Why are you trying to be logical to people like this? Don't do it man.. logic just makes the buffoons more angry.
LOL.
The only baffoons are those who are prepared to stand up for a man who dives and moans himself off the pitch just because he wears a blue shirt.
Grow up.
Citeh&Crew wrote:LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:Citeh&Crew wrote:CityFanFromRome wrote:LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:And let's face it, Bellamy dived.
Not really, there is clearly contact between his and the defender's leg, also why the fuck would he dive once he had already got past his man and was basically into the box?
Why are you trying to be logical to people like this? Don't do it man.. logic just makes the buffoons more angry.
LOL.
The only baffoons are those who are prepared to stand up for a man who dives and moans himself off the pitch just because he wears a blue shirt.
Grow up.
Laughable commentary, from someone who either didn't see the game, is blind, or just doesn't like Craig Bellamy.
You're daft, if you can't see that Bellers was tripped up. At WORST, that is a no-call, and play goes on. Why, you may ask? Because Bellers didn't stay on the ground and roll around; he got up immediately. He CLEARLY wasn't trying to dive. Furthermore, as a ref, even IF one were to think it a dive, is it really appropriate to show a second yellow? Will you defend that decision too?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], zuricity and 180 guests