Tokyo Blue wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:It won't be either of you who make that decision though it will be the bosses, & they will probably look at it exactly as Barnes says; give him another season to get back on track, but that could possibly become 6 months if he starts badly next season.
You have got no idea what they are thinking. None whatsoever. Very few do and those few are not going to go on sky sports to tell everyone. Barnes is giving his opinion and that is all it is, just as you are and with no more authority.
Why do people think the owner demands instant and constant success? He clearly has his own agenda.
I find it interesting that the media (and now some City fans) are projecting the attitude of Chelsea's stereotypical big-money-no-patience owner onto ours, when the truth is none of them have got any idea what he is going to do. Wishful thinking perhaps, certainly from the shithouses in the media. The only thing they have actually got in common is that they put money into the game. Chelsea's owner has appointed numerous managers and hung them all out to dry, including the current geezer, despite trophies. Ours has sacked one bloke they didn't appoint in the first place and gone on to back the man he did put in the job with gargantuan sums of money - and he has delivered the FA Cup and the Title, plus the Charity Shield, which could of course be irrelevant depending on precisely what the owners want and expect.
Excellent post Tokyo Blue.
A "few" have deffo already pressed the self destruction button at "only " coming second in the premier league. After being "patient " for 30 odd years a "few" have become "impatient" after just 8 fucking months ........ unbelievable !