paulmclaren wrote:Over coached you having a laugh, no footballers are 'over coached'.
What is it they 'work' these days?
2 fucking hours max per day max?
They need a fucking reality check some of them.
Nigels Tackle wrote:paulmclaren wrote:Over coached you having a laugh, no footballers are 'over coached'.
What is it they 'work' these days?
2 fucking hours max per day max?
They need a fucking reality check some of them.
not over worked
over coached
Nigels Tackle wrote:simple as that
Ted Hughes wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:simple as that
Over coached at tactical bollocks, under coached at bread & butter football.
sheblue wrote:over coached no.......... under motivated yes.
freshie wrote:
At this level players shouldn't need motivating. What greater motivation can there be then the opportunity to win trophies and write their names in City folklore
bluechester wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:paulmclaren wrote:Over coached you having a laugh, no footballers are 'over coached'.
What is it they 'work' these days?
2 fucking hours max per day max?
They need a fucking reality check some of them.
not over worked
over coached
not enough intensity when we dont have the ball........that is the problem
carl_feedthegoat wrote:I honestly think there are many managers that would do better than Mancini with the tools he has at his dsposal.
Moyes for one would not have fucked around with a defence that was the best in the UK and one of the best in Europe.
Mancini has also proven to be one the worst (if not worst, taking into account the teams that he has managed in this comp) fuckign coaches that I can think of in Europe.
He might have won us the prem and FA cup but he has embarrassed us to fuck in Europe.The point im making is its nothing to do with overcoaching, its more to do with him fuckign up an engine that was already primed for a race.
ross.mcfc wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:I honestly think there are many managers that would do better than Mancini with the tools he has at his dsposal.
Moyes for one would not have fucked around with a defence that was the best in the UK and one of the best in Europe.
Mancini has also proven to be one the worst (if not worst, taking into account the teams that he has managed in this comp) fuckign coaches that I can think of in Europe.
He might have won us the prem and FA cup but he has embarrassed us to fuck in Europe.The point im making is its nothing to do with overcoaching, its more to do with him fuckign up an engine that was already primed for a race.
Agreed. Our owners didnt buy us to do well domestically. It is small change if you look at the big picture. I honestly believe with this squad in this league any manager worth his salt could finish 2nd. Three points and no wins in a group that contained Ajax is embaressing.
He may get his P45 at the end of the season because of this regardless what we do now. Can you honestly say his record in Europe suggests he can do any better?
With Mourinho looking to be on the move it and the Chelsea gig being up for grabs there will be a managerial merry go round with manangers at the end of the season and I fully expect us to be on it.
Ted Hughes wrote:(If I was going to change it & had Pep lined up, I am a proper cunt & I would do the same thing they did with Hughes: sack him as soon as he has a bad run in case he gets it right & wins the league again)
Mancio4ever wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:(If I was going to change it & had Pep lined up, I am a proper cunt & I would do the same thing they did with Hughes: sack him as soon as he has a bad run in case he gets it right & wins the league again)
You may well be right on Pep, Mate.
Just, for truth's sake, the mere Idea to put Mark Hughes in a comparative sentence with Roberto Mancini is a piss take/wind up/ funny joke. (tick as appropriate)
Their managerial history shall continue to run the same way:
one is a proven winner able to build great sides from foundations, in spite of whatsoever Marwood;
the other is a money waster who shall never win a trophy should his managerial career lasts forever.
Ted Hughes wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:(If I was going to change it & had Pep lined up, I am a proper cunt & I would do the same thing they did with Hughes: sack him as soon as he has a bad run in case he gets it right & wins the league again)
You may well be right on Pep, Mate.
Just, for truth's sake, the mere Idea to put Mark Hughes in a comparative sentence with Roberto Mancini is a piss take/wind up/ funny joke. (tick as appropriate)
Their managerial history shall continue to run the same way:
one is a proven winner able to build great sides from foundations, in spite of whatsoever Marwood;
the other is a money waster who shall never win a trophy should his managerial career lasts forever.
That's irrelevant.
The reason they sacked Hughes at that time rather than at the end of the season was, imo, not because they were desperate to get top 4 & had to act, but because they had decided he wasn't the man for the job & wanted to get rid quickly in case he did get top 4 & they were stuck with him. I think that was Khaldoon, not Cook/Marwood. They just followed orders. I don't think Cook even knew til about a week before; he was still telling the press how great Hughes was and how he was the future.
It's not impossible Mancini could face the same. If they leave him in charge for the full season, there's a pretty big chance he'll win the league & then how can they fire him ? I'm not sure they could, even if they wanted to.
If, on the other hand, we had a bad spell over Christmas & slipped behind in the race.. who would complain apart from a few of us ?
This could be a crucial spell for Bob & a few good wins could guarantee him another shot at the Chumps League next season.
If he lifts the players for weekend, it could get the wagons rolling.
Ted Hughes wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:(If I was going to change it & had Pep lined up, I am a proper cunt & I would do the same thing they did with Hughes: sack him as soon as he has a bad run in case he gets it right & wins the league again)
You may well be right on Pep, Mate.
Just, for truth's sake, the mere Idea to put Mark Hughes in a comparative sentence with Roberto Mancini is a piss take/wind up/ funny joke. (tick as appropriate)
Their managerial history shall continue to run the same way:
one is a proven winner able to build great sides from foundations, in spite of whatsoever Marwood;
the other is a money waster who shall never win a trophy should his managerial career lasts forever.
That's irrelevant.
The reason they sacked Hughes at that time rather than at the end of the season was, imo, not because they were desperate to get top 4 & had to act, but because they had decided he wasn't the man for the job & wanted to get rid quickly in case he did get top 4 & they were stuck with him. I think that was Khaldoon, not Cook/Marwood. They just followed orders. I don't think Cook even knew til about a week before; he was still telling the press how great Hughes was and how he was the future.
It's not impossible Mancini could face the same. If they leave him in charge for the full season, there's a pretty big chance he'll win the league & then how can they fire him ? I'm not sure they could, even if they wanted to.
If, on the other hand, we had a bad spell over Christmas & slipped behind in the race.. who would complain apart from a few of us ?
This could be a crucial spell for Bob & a few good wins could guarantee him another shot at the Chumps League next season.
If he lifts the players for weekend, it could get the wagons rolling.
Ted Hughes wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:simple as that
Over coached at tactical bollocks, under coached at bread & butter football.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carl_feedthegoat, johnnyondioline and 169 guests