CITYTILLIDIE11 wrote:Bluez wrote:CITYTILLIDIE11 wrote:
I honestly believe the Shiek would have sacked Hughes last season if it had not been for Cooke doing a PR exercise on the Shiek, I can see Cooke now running to the Shiek with pro-Hughes emails telling him how good he will look to the worlds media knowing his neck was also on the line if Hughes was given the bullet.
So you believe our owner is so stupid he listens to only one person for advice?
Actually I know for a fact he did.
Hughes came a lot closer to the sack than a lot of fans seem to realise, it was common knowledge that we had made approaches to a couple of World Class managers last season, who both rebuffed City’s advances, I am led believe these approaches were made by third party intermediaries at different times
Cooke was the one who recruited Hughes under the Thaksin era, he was the man responsible for signing him, so it was he that put the case across to our owner in Dubai that Hughes has great potential, (self interests) one of the best young British Managers in the game, and also at the time City were getting a lot of bad press in the papers, Cooke said the decision to retain the services of the clueless one would lead to a more positive press in the newspapers, so reluctantly they agreed to retain his services
I firmly believe if Hughes gets the Bullet so will Cooke.
Peter Kenyon is now available and he is also a City fan, who would bet against him becoming our CO in the near future, like him or loath him he is one of the best in the game and the Sheik should make him our very first signing he did great things for Chelsea
Sorry to piss on your chips mate but MH was never ever near the sack ..... and isn't now either. Neither is Cookie by the way. Unless we have a disaster (bottom 6 relegation scrap) he is here for at least a couple of years.
Our owners are not as daft as you and realise that this is a long term project ..... with or without MH. They are conscious that we have to be viewed as a well run set up with realistic aims and objectives and the character to back the management to see it through.
If they were to sack the manager, it would give the wrong signals and the press would jump on the 'mad crazy arabs with cash' syndrome and there would not be a decent manager who would give us the time of day to replace MH.
However, if they give him time and money and he doesn't succeed ...... no one will blame them for sacking him and there will be top quality replacements prepared to take the job on, knowing they too will not just be given money ..... but time too.
So, you will have to be a lot more patient before your wish comes true and even a bad run of results ain't going to change anything. MH has much more time because at the moment, our need to appear credible is more important to our owners than the odd run of bad results.
IMO, they are bang on with their policy. Give MH time ...... and if he doesn't succed we will then be able to recruit anyone we want. Sack him now ..... and no one will touch us with a barge pole.
Relax ... It's only a message board in hyperspace!!