Socrates wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Pretty crap I'd say.
I'm not saying Hughes out, eventhough I think this will be his final season in charge. Let's face it, the system he insist on playing will never get us consistently results on places like this and to get where Sheik is aiming that is a must. He made all the excuses last season and promised to deliver this season. I see individually better players in system Blackburn were using. Absolutely no creativity in the middle of the park. The distances between attack and defence are constantly too long. And now that we got Santa Cruz there, it was clear why he was bought.
I'm sure the usual happy clappers will be here telling what a massive result this was and had it not been ref/Barry Ferguson/ McLEish's dog we would've won.
I hoped we were wrong about Hughes but I'm starting to fear that the original analysis was accurate :O(
Our good start is keeping us up there but can't help feeling we are
4th by default and that we need to see a huge improvement to keep us there.
I like that, it's almost sounds like you want us to be shit. We are 4th with a game in hand on most of those around us. Of our 10 league games, 6 have been away from home and we've been beaten once only.
Now that probably makes me a 'happy clapper' as NQDP refers to, that fine by me I doubt in anywalk of lfe I'll ever be as depressing as he is anyway.
Today was a very poor performance and no City fan can call it otherwise. Who's to blame? Well I'm not going to blame Hughes unlike certain people on here, for me the responsibility today lies solely with the players. These are quality players we are talking about (most of you have agreed on this at one time or another) with a wealth of experience, most of them, no all of them with international experience. To keep thumping it long was plain stupidity, there's no way Hughes asked them to do this or gave them the green light to be outmussled in the middle of the pitch or make fundemental errors.
Of course Santa Cruz was disappointing, any player who is returning to fitness and has been ill with a virus is unlikley to be in a postition to show off his full range of talents, but equally he was undeniably poor and showed next to nothing in terms of ability and comitment, also worrying to see him with his knee so heavily strapped. Perhaps there will be a case to say that RSC was a Hughes error over time, it looks like that may be the case but it is still too early to be certain of this.
As someone pointed out after the departure of RSC today, we continued to throw the long ball down the middle, largely because we were either clearing our lines under pressure (which we had brought on ourselves) or becasue we were simply choosing the wrong option - does Hughes tell them to play like this? I seriously doubt it. Hughes would demand that we show for each other, movement off the ball a quick tempo, condense the play where required to do so and ensure that we play with width and use the pace that we undoubtedly have in abundance - the players didn't rise to the challenge simple as.
I think, unlike NQDP that our Arab owners are comitted to give Hughes every chance and will back him, they will be talking and listening to the right people and will want Hughes to be to City what bacon face has become to the rags, they will know from city history that changing your manager every 10 mins is not necessarily the right route to take on the road to success. They will know that we are fourth tonight with a game in hand on most teams on merit and not by default.