so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby Socrates » Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:00 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Haha nice to see RIG back he really does raise a laugh when you most need it.

So I decided to post on this thread out of them all. As is well known I like to be positive whenever possible but at the same time I think I am fairly realistic about where we are and what's going on. Obviously on the positive side we are not losing games which we would have done last year when not playing well but I fear there are a few negatives which are getting a full airing on here.

The last 3 away game draws in isolation haven't been bad results really unless you have the belief that just because we have spent zillions we should smash almost any other team.If I remember correctly 3 managers in a row ( O'Neil , Martinez and now McLeish) have heaped praise onto their team saying how excellently that have played etc etc and yet we havent lost!!

What is concerning though is that we haven't posed enough of a threat in these games. OK we have a few chances and some other situations which just lack a final pass. We seem to be fairly ok on the wings but very little is happening down the middle. Ade hasn't been in good form after his lay off , RSC isn't fully ready yet and really needs somebody playing close with him and Tevez... well it isn't quite happening for him yet either. He does some good stuff but if he is to be considered a central strike partner he needs to be up there a lot more.

If the front 2 in a 4.4.2 system arent playing well there is a problem especially when the 2 midfield players don't really get alongside and past them much if at all. As I and many others have said before I don't think 4.4.2 suits our players but if we stick with it we need miles better performances from the front 2 plus I would say a different playmaking central midfielder , namely Stevie.

There has been all the talk about the team gelling but for me the gelling is more about the manager finding out about the players we have and the best way to use them. So far not so good on that front.

And also irrespective of the system we play I want to see braver team selections
. Form and fitness should count for a lot. Players out of form should be replaced if the sub is in good form and the same should happen if the player isn't fully fit. Maybe he has to do more of that and we might see Weiss quite soon.


yes, yes and yes! Doug.
On the first - It's the performances that are baffling, if we were creating loads and teams were holding on for draws then I doubt we'd be having much debate.
On the second and third points - we seems to be getting worse not better and it's worrying. RSC's presence just doesn't make sense with the way the rest of the team is put together. Can't work out the Tafia's thinking on this at all.
Manchester : New York : Melbourne : Yokohama
User avatar
Socrates
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22681
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:08 am
Supporter of: st marks (gorton)

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby dazby » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:10 pm

I think the idea was to outpace them with our speed. Long balls in an attempt to get behind and then find Rocky's head.''

However, the passing just isn't accurate enough. If Sweep zigged when he zags he'd be much better. For some reason he tries to trick players by running back into them.

The tactic. Whatever formation. Keep the ball on the deck. Short passing at a high tempo. The players are skilful enough to do it. Use a high ball to Rocky as an alternative, not the majority ball.
Attack the argument of the person, not the person of the argument- except Carl.
User avatar
dazby
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19308
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:02 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Ed

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby DoomMerchant » Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:54 pm

Wonderwall wrote:
Dameerto wrote:Kompany was as bad as Lescott today - his passing/distribution was crap.



also looked like Kompany was running in treacle at times, he is quick once he has built up his speed but he is awful from a standing start. We were lucky he didnt cost us a couple of goals today with his poor decision making.


did you see what appeared to be Bellamy freak out at Kompany during the match and the camera flashed at Vinnie who then yells in Bellamy's direction to "shut the fuck up and play"?

im pretty sure that's what happened, but did anyone else catch that? i think it was towards the end when Vinnie made a meal out of a ball in the box and hit it out for a corner. ANyone remember or catch this?

i wasn't impressed with Kompany yesterday. he's going to need sometime to get fit, but that's the story we've been telling in defense of half the sqaud all season so far it seems.
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby Original Dub » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:20 pm

Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:
blackburnblue wrote:
Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:forget tactics Hughes needs to go, Hughes and tactics don't go together Hughes tactics put 11 men on the field and hpoe we win

do us all a favour pal and do one......


So you want Hughes to stay you must be a rag, all us true CITY fans want him gone.Our last 6 managers did not have 200m to spend and they got the sack playing shit just like we are playing now.


:)

True city fan indeed.
Original Dub
 

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:24 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Haha nice to see RIG back he really does raise a laugh when you most need it.

So I decided to post on this thread out of them all. As is well known I like to be positive whenever possible but at the same time I think I am fairly realistic about where we are and what's going on. Obviously on the positive side we are not losing games which we would have done last year when not playing well but I fear there are a few negatives which are getting a full airing on here.

The last 3 away game draws in isolation haven't been bad results really unless you have the belief that just because we have spent zillions we should smash almost any other team.If I remember correctly 3 managers in a row ( O'Neil , Martinez and now McLeish) have heaped praise onto their team saying how excellently that have played etc etc and yet we havent lost!!

What is concerning though is that we haven't posed enough of a threat in these games. OK we have a few chances and some other situations which just lack a final pass. We seem to be fairly ok on the wings but very little is happening down the middle. Ade hasn't been in good form after his lay off , RSC isn't fully ready yet and really needs somebody playing close with him and Tevez... well it isn't quite happening for him yet either. He does some good stuff but if he is to be considered a central strike partner he needs to be up there a lot more.

If the front 2 in a 4.4.2 system arent playing well there is a problem especially when the 2 midfield players don't really get alongside and past them much if at all. As I and many others have said before I don't think 4.4.2 suits our players but if we stick with it we need miles better performances from the front 2 plus I would say a different playmaking central midfielder , namely Stevie.

There has been all the talk about the team gelling but for me the gelling is more about the manager finding out about the players we have and the best way to use them. So far not so good on that front.

And also irrespective of the system we play I want to see braver team selections. Form and fitness should count for a lot. Players out of form should be replaced if the sub is in good form and the same should happen if the player isn't fully fit. Maybe he has to do more of that and we might see Weiss quite soon.


Good post. Agree with all of that.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby Wonderwall » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:42 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Haha nice to see RIG back he really does raise a laugh when you most need it.

So I decided to post on this thread out of them all. As is well known I like to be positive whenever possible but at the same time I think I am fairly realistic about where we are and what's going on. Obviously on the positive side we are not losing games which we would have done last year when not playing well but I fear there are a few negatives which are getting a full airing on here.

The last 3 away game draws in isolation haven't been bad results really unless you have the belief that just because we have spent zillions we should smash almost any other team.If I remember correctly 3 managers in a row ( O'Neil , Martinez and now McLeish) have heaped praise onto their team saying how excellently that have played etc etc and yet we havent lost!!

What is concerning though is that we haven't posed enough of a threat in these games. OK we have a few chances and some other situations which just lack a final pass. We seem to be fairly ok on the wings but very little is happening down the middle. Ade hasn't been in good form after his lay off , RSC isn't fully ready yet and really needs somebody playing close with him and Tevez... well it isn't quite happening for him yet either. He does some good stuff but if he is to be considered a central strike partner he needs to be up there a lot more.

If the front 2 in a 4.4.2 system arent playing well there is a problem especially when the 2 midfield players don't really get alongside and past them much if at all. As I and many others have said before I don't think 4.4.2 suits our players but if we stick with it we need miles better performances from the front 2 plus I would say a different playmaking central midfielder , namely Stevie.

There has been all the talk about the team gelling but for me the gelling is more about the manager finding out about the players we have and the best way to use them. So far not so good on that front.

And also irrespective of the system we play I want to see braver team selections. Form and fitness should count for a lot. Players out of form should be replaced if the sub is in good form and the same should happen if the player isn't fully fit. Maybe he has to do more of that and we might see Weiss quite soon.


I think the fact that Ireland and Richards have been benched shows that Hughes thinks their form is not good enough. I would like to think that it is the responsibility of the players as much as the manager to understand their team-mates and how they like to play and what makes them tick on the field.
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby AlpsMaster » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:58 pm

I also very much agree with Doug's post above (although I won't requote this time) which makes a refeshing change from all the glass one third empty brigade.

The player I think we missed most yesterday was Toure.

When he captains the side we definitely don't see as much resorting to the long ball as the default option rather than a well considered alternative.

Great sides have great spines and with Given - Toure - Ireland - Adebayor we have got a very firm spine indeed. The converse seems to be that without them we can be somewhat spineless in more ways than one.
User avatar
AlpsMaster
Superman's Underpants
 
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:31 am
Location: Morecambe
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Vincent Kompany

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby Bluez » Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:39 pm

AlpsMaster wrote:I also very much agree with Doug's post above (although I won't requote this time) which makes a refeshing change from all the glass one third empty brigade.

The player I think we missed most yesterday was Toure.

When he captains the side we definitely don't see as much resorting to the long ball as the default option rather than a well considered alternative.

Great sides have great spines and with Given - Toure - Ireland - Adebayor we have got a very firm spine indeed. The converse seems to be that without them we can be somewhat spineless in more ways than one.


Spot on, and three of those four are injured. The only reason Hughes changed a winning team was because of injuries.
Light travels faster than sound.
Thats why some people appear bright until they open their mouth.

DISCLAIMER- My views are mine alone, and probably rubbish anyway.
User avatar
Bluez
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5436
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: On the Edge of Insanity

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby Original Dub » Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:47 pm

Bluez wrote:
AlpsMaster wrote:I also very much agree with Doug's post above (although I won't requote this time) which makes a refeshing change from all the glass one third empty brigade.

The player I think we missed most yesterday was Toure.

When he captains the side we definitely don't see as much resorting to the long ball as the default option rather than a well considered alternative.

Great sides have great spines and with Given - Toure - Ireland - Adebayor we have got a very firm spine indeed. The converse seems to be that without them we can be somewhat spineless in more ways than one.


Spot on, and three of those four are injured. The only reason Hughes changed a winning team was because of injuries.


some on here would try and tell you that those 2 or 3 injuries don't make a difference and it can't be used for an excuse. Although, I think these people may not like Mark Hughes...
Original Dub
 

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby Bluez » Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:32 pm

Original Dub wrote:
Bluez wrote:
AlpsMaster wrote:I also very much agree with Doug's post above (although I won't requote this time) which makes a refeshing change from all the glass one third empty brigade.

The player I think we missed most yesterday was Toure.

When he captains the side we definitely don't see as much resorting to the long ball as the default option rather than a well considered alternative.

Great sides have great spines and with Given - Toure - Ireland - Adebayor we have got a very firm spine indeed. The converse seems to be that without them we can be somewhat spineless in more ways than one.


Spot on, and three of those four are injured. The only reason Hughes changed a winning team was because of injuries.


some on here would try and tell you that those 2 or 3 injuries don't make a difference and it can't be used for an excuse. Although, I think these people may not like Mark Hughes...

I think most sane people would think that losing Toure, Ireland, Robinho and Adebayor would affect most teams.
Light travels faster than sound.
Thats why some people appear bright until they open their mouth.

DISCLAIMER- My views are mine alone, and probably rubbish anyway.
User avatar
Bluez
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5436
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: On the Edge of Insanity

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby Blueboylewis » Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:06 pm

He needs to think about playing 4-3-3.

How about this,

Given

Bridge
Lescott
Kolo
Zabaleta

Barry
Ireland
De Jong

Tevez
Adebayor
Bellamy


We would have de jong and Barry supprting the 2 full backs, We would have Ireland making those runs through the middle looking for a ball through and obviously supprting the strikers! Tevez, ade and bellers between them should have more than enough to cause havoc!!
User avatar
Blueboylewis
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3746
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:14 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:08 pm

Wonderwall wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Haha nice to see RIG back he really does raise a laugh when you most need it.

So I decided to post on this thread out of them all. As is well known I like to be positive whenever possible but at the same time I think I am fairly realistic about where we are and what's going on. Obviously on the positive side we are not losing games which we would have done last year when not playing well but I fear there are a few negatives which are getting a full airing on here.

The last 3 away game draws in isolation haven't been bad results really unless you have the belief that just because we have spent zillions we should smash almost any other team.If I remember correctly 3 managers in a row ( O'Neil , Martinez and now McLeish) have heaped praise onto their team saying how excellently that have played etc etc and yet we havent lost!!

What is concerning though is that we haven't posed enough of a threat in these games. OK we have a few chances and some other situations which just lack a final pass. We seem to be fairly ok on the wings but very little is happening down the middle. Ade hasn't been in good form after his lay off , RSC isn't fully ready yet and really needs somebody playing close with him and Tevez... well it isn't quite happening for him yet either. He does some good stuff but if he is to be considered a central strike partner he needs to be up there a lot more.

If the front 2 in a 4.4.2 system arent playing well there is a problem especially when the 2 midfield players don't really get alongside and past them much if at all. As I and many others have said before I don't think 4.4.2 suits our players but if we stick with it we need miles better performances from the front 2 plus I would say a different playmaking central midfielder , namely Stevie.

There has been all the talk about the team gelling but for me the gelling is more about the manager finding out about the players we have and the best way to use them. So far not so good on that front.

And also irrespective of the system we play I want to see braver team selections. Form and fitness should count for a lot. Players out of form should be replaced if the sub is in good form and the same should happen if the player isn't fully fit. Maybe he has to do more of that and we might see Weiss quite soon.


I think the fact that Ireland and Richards have been benched shows that Hughes thinks their form is not good enough. I would like to think that it is the responsibility of the players as much as the manager to understand their team-mates and how they like to play and what makes them tick on the field.


I agree Richards form is not good enough and that is totally the reason he is now benched but not so sure re Ireland. He was initially left out doe to ilnness/injury and I am not 100% sure he is fully over that yet.If he isn't then maybe a part game is all he can do but if he is fit he should imo be playing.He has the quality in midfield we simply don't have in any other player.

On the other point yes of course the players should know what is expected of them within a system or team and what makes teamates tick but somehow at the moment that understanding just isn't showing.They do work on it in training ,albeit fleetingly of late, due to international breaks and injuries and no doubt will do planty more as one thing I am totally sure of is that Hughes and co can see what we are seeing. They seem to differ on how to resolve it at the moment but we will see if/how things change.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby M147WN » Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:34 pm

I don't think Hughes can see what we see!
That's not having a go ... A seat in the stand and it's a different game compared to watching at pitch level.
He should seriously sit in the stand on a regular basis!
Image

I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotomy!
User avatar
M147WN
Richard Dunne's Own Goals
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:28 am
Location: Poynton

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby Grob » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:29 am

Last years system worked quite well on the whole for me. We just didnt have enough good players in key positions.

Now we've bought those players we have started to use a different, more negative, and more confusing system.

Get back to what we were doing last season with Stevie in attack, Barry at quarterback, so to speak, maybe Zabs gettng around midfield breaking things up and moving the play on, Petrov/Robinho/Tevez/Bellemy/SWP in the wide striker roles and RSC or Ade down the middle.

Simples.

On a side note, I wish we had an Elano that could tackle/fully fit Johnson. That player would fit in with Barry and Stevie perfectly.
Image
Grob
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15012
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:20 pm
Location: London

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby FA cup winners 2006 » Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:00 am

hughes seems to be limiting the amount of work required of some players. Barry for example was required to run villas midfield and help out all over the pitch. with us he seems to sit back alot (obviously under instruction) and it is effecting his game.

________________Given

Zabeleta-----toure------Lescott------Bridge

-----Ireland-------De Jong-------Barry

-----------Tevez----------Bellemy

------------------Ade

i would like to see hughes going with a 433, and leave the midfield work to Ireland - De Jong - Barry, with De Jong to sit a bit deeper and stevie and barry to control the tempo and do the box to box stuff. also i would like to see the wide men (Bellemy & Tevez) to have a free role behind Ade and concentrate on probing the defence.

A worry i would have with this formation is how exposed the full backs would be but if De Jong can sit that bit deeper he can help out at CB and push toure and lescott out to help the full backs. also with Bellemy, Tevez and Ade (Robbie) when fit sitting up front i dont think we will see many opposing full backs charging forward.

this formation also lends itself to be easily changed without drastically changing tactics. SWP and Petrov on for Tevez and Bellemy with Ireland to Play of Ade should see us be able to protect a lead and still be a threat on the counter.

the major thing i would like to see change is us to attack from the start and not let teams to get settled into games, build up our lead and then see a game out
FA cup winners 2006
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:41 pm

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby mcfc1632 » Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:54 am

My ideal line up – would be:

-------------------------------Given

New RB---------------------------------------------------------------------Bridge

--------------Toure--------------------------------Lescott

-----De Jong--------------------------------------------------------Barry

----Tevez-------------------------------------------------------Bellamy

--------------------------------Robinho

--------------------------------Ade

The system will require the width to come from full backs – which is why a new one is required – world class that can be a genuine wing back – must be able to link up play – must be able to get past players and down the wing – must be a very good crosser of the ball (Petrov level) – and must be of a mindset to get back to defend (unlike Micah) and be a good tackler.

When the wingback move forward you can have the confidence that Toure / De Jong – Lescott / Barry are providing excellent cover – leaving Tevez and Bellers to get lots of room with the distraction Ade causes and Rob will just sit there for fun laying in perfectly weighted balls for Bellers and Tevez or popping it in himself if the opportunity is there.

I would then rotate in Stevie for De Jong during games when we are comfortable or need more creativity with the starting place going to whoever is playing best. I would use Petrov on a regular basis to replace Bellers directly or another player if the match position means we need to push Bellers up front.

Until we get the new RB, I would try SWP at RB and if Hughes is not brave enough for that, Zab.

After the new RB arrives, I would use Zab, SWP, Johnson, Kompany and others as genuine squad players and find them sub roles to keep them involved – I would put Micah in the reserves until he finds his form and brain.
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

Re: so, hughes needs to change it, what options?

Postby DoomMerchant » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:04 pm

M147WN wrote:I don't think Hughes can see what we see!
That's not having a go ... A seat in the stand and it's a different game compared to watching at pitch level.
He should seriously sit in the stand on a regular basis!


there are actually cameras all over the stadium which give Hughes an even better view of the team. When i went on the tour of COMS i was told that it was pretty common for Hughes to even have video of the first half which he would highlight and point out things during the halftime break of a match from what he and his coaches had seen. He's extremely into video reviews and technology apparently.

Galaga, Pac-Man, etc as well maybe.

cheers
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CTID Hants, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mansour21, Nigels Tackle, PeterParker and 127 guests