Ted Hughes wrote:I thought Milner was having a spell as our best attacker at the point when Bob took him off v Brum but it's true that the main reason we signed him was because of his midfield performances at Villa, absolutely not for his wing play.
Jo did as he was told today & it helped balance the team but to suggest he was actually good is pushing the limits of imagination imo. Bob must believe that Ade is too indisciplined to do that job, as he's twice the player Jo is. It's a pity he can't prove himself worthy of trust to play that position when needed.
bluechester wrote:am i the only one, who has been disappointed with milner since he as joined us
Ted Hughes wrote:I thought Milner was having a spell as our best attacker at the point when Bob took him off v Brum but it's true that the main reason we signed him was because of his midfield performances at Villa, absolutely not for his wing play.
Jo did as he was told today & it helped balance the team but to suggest he was actually good is pushing the limits of imagination imo. Bob must believe that Ade is too indisciplined to do that job, as he's twice the player Jo is. It's a pity he can't prove himself worthy of trust to play that position when needed.
shawzy wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I thought Milner was having a spell as our best attacker at the point when Bob took him off v Brum but it's true that the main reason we signed him was because of his midfield performances at Villa, absolutely not for his wing play.
Jo did as he was told today & it helped balance the team but to suggest he was actually good is pushing the limits of imagination imo. Bob must believe that Ade is too indisciplined to do that job, as he's twice the player Jo is. It's a pity he can't prove himself worthy of trust to play that position when needed.
So you say he balanced the team but your still sayin he wasnt good? He put a shift in didnt he? Bloody daft comment..Im all for Jo bein in the 1st team next game..Mancini got it right today with that 1st 11.
Sister of fu wrote:I'm I the only one that feels very sorry for Milner. He is a box to box CM and iv only ever seen him on the left and then the right. I think the critisim aimed at him is a tad harsh as last season at Villa he was one of the best in the prem in that postion. Hopefully he will get his chance in the middle and show us all what he can do.
Spurge wrote:Sister of fu wrote:I'm I the only one that feels very sorry for Milner. He is a box to box CM and iv only ever seen him on the left and then the right. I think the critisim aimed at him is a tad harsh as last season at Villa he was one of the best in the prem in that postion. Hopefully he will get his chance in the middle and show us all what he can do.
Milners best game for City to date was his debut - he's found it tough since, but I agree his best position in central midfield and as suggested already on this thread, I'm sure at some stage his time will come as a result of an injury or suspension.
Ted Hughes wrote:shawzy wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I thought Milner was having a spell as our best attacker at the point when Bob took him off v Brum but it's true that the main reason we signed him was because of his midfield performances at Villa, absolutely not for his wing play.
Jo did as he was told today & it helped balance the team but to suggest he was actually good is pushing the limits of imagination imo. Bob must believe that Ade is too indisciplined to do that job, as he's twice the player Jo is. It's a pity he can't prove himself worthy of trust to play that position when needed.
So you say he balanced the team but your still sayin he wasnt good? He put a shift in didnt he? Bloody daft comment..Im all for Jo bein in the 1st team next game..Mancini got it right today with that 1st 11.
I don't think he did anything any other attacker in the squad couldn't have done but he kapt his discipline positionally & I think the fact that he's technically a striker was clever psychology from Bob to give the team a more positive mentality. Good though? Nah sorry can't agree. He did ok in some parts & gave away the ball badly in others.
shawzy wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:shawzy wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I thought Milner was having a spell as our best attacker at the point when Bob took him off v Brum but it's true that the main reason we signed him was because of his midfield performances at Villa, absolutely not for his wing play.
Jo did as he was told today & it helped balance the team but to suggest he was actually good is pushing the limits of imagination imo. Bob must believe that Ade is too indisciplined to do that job, as he's twice the player Jo is. It's a pity he can't prove himself worthy of trust to play that position when needed.
So you say he balanced the team but your still sayin he wasnt good? He put a shift in didnt he? Bloody daft comment..Im all for Jo bein in the 1st team next game..Mancini got it right today with that 1st 11.
I don't think he did anything any other attacker in the squad couldn't have done but he kapt his discipline positionally & I think the fact that he's technically a striker was clever psychology from Bob to give the team a more positive mentality. Good though? Nah sorry can't agree. He did ok in some parts & gave away the ball badly in others.
Iv not seen anyone on the left wing this season that has played better so thats maybe why he he has stood out....Fookin chuffed with the blues today m8..Best performance of the season from all.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, Bluemoon4610, city72, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Nigels Tackle, salford city and 132 guests