carl_feedthegoat wrote:ant london wrote:I don't like Platt very much, I think he has a hopeless CV but I honestly can't give too much of a shit about this. Certainly isn't upsetting me to the extent that it seems to be having on some of you.
What I still find funny though is that the cretins who were up in arms about the Taffia and Hughes' nepotistic appointments (and who are like a bunch of fucking Moonies about Mancini) don't appear to be able to focus any of that same negativity onto Roberto?
EDITED AS I MISREAD.
So a pundit slag's off city on a fucking continuous basis and then get's employed by City and you dont get as upset as most of us?
I dont understand how this cannot upset you as much as most of us lot?
It's bollok's..that's what it is........
Mate, I think it's a shit appointment. Full stop.
I don't like the no mark, I would definitely prefer him not to be at City.
As with the MH appointment, what annoys me is the fact that it is yet another thing that will lead to fans feeling disenchanted/annoyed at the club at this time when we should all, be buzzing about everything to do with City. It also gives those blues who don't appear to be content unless they have something to moan about another hobbyhorse to bang on about. That pisses me off almost as much as the fact that some idiot thought it would be a good idea to give the fat cunt a job.
So, I'm not happy.....but I'd honestly rather concentrate on the fact that we've signed three top drawer players, there are more to come, this fucking noisy shitty world cup is almost over (and has actually got quite good now) and the fact that City are soon back in action
I can't be arsed getting worked up about old hamster cheeks