Mase wrote:Cristiano Ronaldo will be able to play for Portugal in their opening game at next summer's World Cup finals despite his red card against the Republic of Ireland.
Ronaldo, 40, was sent off for an elbow to Dara O'Shea's back during Portugal's 2-0 qualifying defeat earlier this month.
Violent conduct normally carries a three-match ban but Ronaldo has had the second and third matches suspended for a year.
BBC Sport understands that the fact it was his first red card in 226 international appearances was taken into account.
What the actual fuck?!!!!

nottsblue wrote:Is anyone remotely surprised though?
Money talks. Always has and without any shadow of doubt, always will
The sponsors will have had a word to FIFA
Bluemoon4610 wrote:nottsblue wrote:Is anyone remotely surprised though?
Money talks. Always has and without any shadow of doubt, always will
The sponsors will have had a word to FIFA
Any truth in the rumour that FIFA's on-hold music is ABBA's Money, Money, Money?


nottsblue wrote:Now we have started scoring goals from players other than Haaland, I wonder what reason the pundits/media will now come up with why we aren't really in the title race?
Poor defence? We've conceded only 1 more than Villa or Chelsea
8 less than the dippers and 1 less than Newcastle.
And we've outscored everyone by some way by the way

patrickblue wrote:nottsblue wrote:Now we have started scoring goals from players other than Haaland, I wonder what reason the pundits/media will now come up with why we aren't really in the title race?
Poor defence? We've conceded only 1 more than Villa or Chelsea
8 less than the dippers and 1 less than Newcastle.
And we've outscored everyone by some way by the way
I noticed that. Same GD as the Arse, who are where they are due to their defence.
An injury or two will knock a hole in that.
Our defence could be better, and can be a bit error prone now and then, but I wouldn't call it poor.

nottsblue wrote:https://www.skysports.com/share/13482147
Was it just an oversight in this report they failed to mention the rags debt is over £750M?
It must be .............
Bluemoon4610 wrote:nottsblue wrote:https://www.skysports.com/share/13482147
Was it just an oversight in this report they failed to mention the rags debt is over £750M?
It must be .............
Saw a few places reporting $1.1B debt, closer to £820M. Luvvly Jubbly
salford city wrote:Bluemoon4610 wrote:nottsblue wrote:https://www.skysports.com/share/13482147
Was it just an oversight in this report they failed to mention the rags debt is over £750M?
It must be .............
Saw a few places reporting $1.1B debt, closer to £820M. Luvvly Jubbly
Always nice to see the debt and servicing of it climb. Unfortunately, some fucker will still come in and buy them regardless of that unless their lack of success on the pitch continues- which we can all hope continues
nottsblue wrote:https://youtube.com/shorts/pV1lZ3eNnFc?si=z-5nE41v5lZhRiqk
Was Barton all that wrong?

carl_feedthegoat wrote:nottsblue wrote:https://youtube.com/shorts/pV1lZ3eNnFc?si=z-5nE41v5lZhRiqk
Was Barton all that wrong?
IMO , She’s thick as shit and doesn’t deserve to be anywhere near a microphone commenting on the men’s game.
nottsblue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:nottsblue wrote:https://youtube.com/shorts/pV1lZ3eNnFc?si=z-5nE41v5lZhRiqk
Was Barton all that wrong?
IMO , She’s thick as shit and doesn’t deserve to be anywhere near a microphone commenting on the men’s game.
The epitome of a DEI hire
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Slim and 585 guests