IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

IS ROBERTO MANCINI THE MAN TO LEAD CITY TO THE TITLE?

YES
159
50%
NO
62
20%
NOT SURE
94
30%
 
Total votes : 315

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby daved » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:19 pm

By Stephen Johnson
'Typical City'... the two words that have haunted Manchester City fans like myself for many, many years.

In a nutshell it describes Man City's incredible ability to self implode at the most opportune moment. The club's ability to do this year in, year out, has brought about a steely resilience all blues have instilled in them at birth.

As a 30-year old fan, who has been a regular visitor for the past 23 years, I have seen it all. And this period has also coincided with them lot down the road having their finest hours. Going to school in Trafford, and being blue during the 90's, was far more self destructive and depressing than any goth, vamp or emo kid can ever imagine. The abuse was relentless on a daily basis.

And so, into adulthood and nothing much changed - we were continuously flirting with relegation, and loyally following this yo-yo club was all part of the job. We've for a long time been the nation's joke club, and sharing a city as we do with that lot up the road provides a staggering juxtaposition of fortunes.

If a club needed 3 points to stay up, we would hand it over; if a striker needed confidence after a barren spell -come to Maine Road, we'll help you out. Never won away from home in the top flight ? Don't worry, you got City coming up. Lets move to a new stadium, and why not call our stand The Bell End ? Oh, and if a manager does finally start to turn things round, sack him and get someone else to bring us back down to earth. And if no other team will buy your worst squad players, send 'em to City. We'll 'ave 'em, and pay three times over the odds as well!

Playing lower league opposition in the cup... well that's a given. Last minute penalty at home on the final day of the season to get into Europe. Can we miss it ? Yes we can! Not been to a semi-final in 28 years... well Chesterfield have, Wigan have, Cardiff have, Burnley have, Barnsley have, Southampton... Oh I give up.

Oh yes, but then there is other side of the coin - Blackburn away from home when they are romping away with the league title. Yeah, we'll turn them over quite easily. Chelsea not lost all season ? We'll beat them no problem. 3-0 and a man down at half-time in the Cup to Spurs ? Sure, we'll win 4-3 . United at Old Trafford, on their very own Remembrance Day, it's a given. We'll do 'em.

These are just some of the things that make up the phenomena that is 'typical City',and has been a predictable sub plot my entire life...

But wait, what's this ? Has the seemingly endless optimism that things are going to get better actually paid off ? It's a takeover!! Get in there. In comes the legendary lethario Sven and a load of players we've never heard of, but are really excited about (Elano ? Shaktar Donestsk ? Must be good if we've never heard of him - whoever had heard of Ronaldo ?).

Oh, but also in comes a Thai dictator with an extremely dubious human rights record. Our 531st false dawn ? Surely not ?...... Of course it was! Turns out the Thai dictator is skint, extremely nasty and on the lamb from the Thai government - nice one!

Typical City. With rumours of a fire sale going on, we beat AC Milan (typical City), new manager Mark Hughes realises we actually have no money and is thought to be considering his options (typical City), and CEO Cook then insists we're going to be as big as Coca Cola (typical City).

But something was actually happening. Something so big, that all the false dawns, empty promises and spectacular failures would pale into significance. And on the final day of the transfer window September 2008, Manchester City officially became the richest club in the world. Unbelievable.

Cook's ramblings were no longer dismissed as nonsense. The fans 30+ years wait with nothing but blind faith, optimism and chicken balti pies to keep them going, was at an end. The numerous broken promises that City would one day rise from the flames like a phoenix, and become a leading light in world football were now within our grasp. This surely could not be a false dawn... could it ?

Surely we couldn't mess it up this time... Surely - we had Robinhio!

However, being in the bottom three for a bit last season, conceding three at home to Burnley this term, and our minds were racing once again. Typical City.

Then, right on cue, with impeccable timing, typical City come up with the goods again. In one fell swoop we:

Sack Hughes despite being on target in sixth place (Typical City)

Make up some nonsense about a points target that didn't work out (Typical City)

And finally leave the new guy (Roberto Mancini) to fend for himself in pigeon English at a press conference (so Typical City).

And so to today, we are still desperately trying to banish the typical City tag and take over the world. So far so good, a semi (finally), decent players, decent manager and a genuine shot at Champions League football next season. And, for the very first time in my lifetime, something really good left to play for in March!

But I'll leave you with one of my favourite quotes about the club I love. Franny Lee once said: 'If there was a cup for cock ups, we would win it'. Please City, no more cocks up - at least not this term.
daved
Carlo Nash's Debut
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:54 pm
Location: poynton
Supporter of: The Blues

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby john@staustell » Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:25 am

daved wrote:By Stephen Johnson
'Typical City'... the two words that have haunted Manchester City fans like myself for many, many years.

In a nutshell it describes Man City's incredible ability to self implode at the most opportune moment. The club's ability to do this year in, year out, has brought about a steely resilience all blues have instilled in them at birth.

As a 30-year old fan, who has been a regular visitor for the past 23 years, I have seen it all. And this period has also coincided with them lot down the road having their finest hours. Going to school in Trafford, and being blue during the 90's, was far more self destructive and depressing than any goth, vamp or emo kid can ever imagine. The abuse was relentless on a daily basis.

And so, into adulthood and nothing much changed - we were continuously flirting with relegation, and loyally following this yo-yo club was all part of the job. We've for a long time been the nation's joke club, and sharing a city as we do with that lot up the road provides a staggering juxtaposition of fortunes.

If a club needed 3 points to stay up, we would hand it over; if a striker needed confidence after a barren spell -come to Maine Road, we'll help you out. Never won away from home in the top flight ? Don't worry, you got City coming up. Lets move to a new stadium, and why not call our stand The Bell End ? Oh, and if a manager does finally start to turn things round, sack him and get someone else to bring us back down to earth. And if no other team will buy your worst squad players, send 'em to City. We'll 'ave 'em, and pay three times over the odds as well!

Playing lower league opposition in the cup... well that's a given. Last minute penalty at home on the final day of the season to get into Europe. Can we miss it ? Yes we can! Not been to a semi-final in 28 years... well Chesterfield have, Wigan have, Cardiff have, Burnley have, Barnsley have, Southampton... Oh I give up.

Oh yes, but then there is other side of the coin - Blackburn away from home when they are romping away with the league title. Yeah, we'll turn them over quite easily. Chelsea not lost all season ? We'll beat them no problem. 3-0 and a man down at half-time in the Cup to Spurs ? Sure, we'll win 4-3 . U***d at Old Trafford, on their very own Remembrance Day, it's a given. We'll do 'em.

These are just some of the things that make up the phenomena that is 'typical City',and has been a predictable sub plot my entire life...

But wait, what's this ? Has the seemingly endless optimism that things are going to get better actually paid off ? It's a takeover!! Get in there. In comes the legendary lethario Sven and a load of players we've never heard of, but are really excited about (Elano ? Shaktar Donestsk ? Must be good if we've never heard of him - whoever had heard of Ronaldo ?).

Oh, but also in comes a Thai dictator with an extremely dubious human rights record. Our 531st false dawn ? Surely not ?...... Of course it was! Turns out the Thai dictator is skint, extremely nasty and on the lamb from the Thai government - nice one!

Typical City. With rumours of a fire sale going on, we beat AC Milan (typical City), new manager Mark Hughes realises we actually have no money and is thought to be considering his options (typical City), and CEO Cook then insists we're going to be as big as Coca Cola (typical City).

But something was actually happening. Something so big, that all the false dawns, empty promises and spectacular failures would pale into significance. And on the final day of the transfer window September 2008, Manchester City officially became the richest club in the world. Unbelievable.

Cook's ramblings were no longer dismissed as nonsense. The fans 30+ years wait with nothing but blind faith, optimism and chicken balti pies to keep them going, was at an end. The numerous broken promises that City would one day rise from the flames like a phoenix, and become a leading light in world football were now within our grasp. This surely could not be a false dawn... could it ?

Surely we couldn't mess it up this time... Surely - we had Robinhio!

However, being in the bottom three for a bit last season, conceding three at home to Burnley this term, and our minds were racing once again. Typical City.

Then, right on cue, with impeccable timing, typical City come up with the goods again. In one fell swoop we:

Sack Hughes despite being on target in sixth place (Typical City)

Make up some nonsense about a points target that didn't work out (Typical City)

And finally leave the new guy (Roberto Mancini) to fend for himself in pigeon English at a press conference (so Typical City).

And so to today, we are still desperately trying to banish the typical City tag and take over the world. So far so good, a semi (finally), decent players, decent manager and a genuine shot at Champions League football next season. And, for the very first time in my lifetime, something really good left to play for in March!

But I'll leave you with one of my favourite quotes about the club I love. Franny Lee once said: 'If there was a cup for cock ups, we would win it'. Please City, no more cocks up - at least not this term.


Just what is needed. Yet another 'typical City' article. One wonders how many times these guys can re-cycle the same old material. People like him will be a tad sad when we are an established heavyweight.
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 20292
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby ant london » Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:41 am

john@staustell wrote:
Just what is needed. Yet another 'typical City' article. One wonders how many times these guys can re-cycle the same old material. People like him will be a tad sad when we are an established heavyweight.


you miserable old fucker.....that was actually a rather funny piece. Spot on too
Image
User avatar
ant london
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11505
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:01 pm
Location: Almaty
Supporter of: Cityski
My favourite player is: Mario Balotelli

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby Swales4ever » Sun Mar 14, 2010 8:07 am

The only actual "just what needed" is to score a point more than Spouds, Scouses & Villans at the season end.

It will greatly benefit The Club, the manager, the players and us fans, equally and alltogether...

Just wanted to run for "Mr. Lapalisse of the months" award......lol.

1. "unintelligible language"
2. "ACID QUEEN"
3. "never once fails to turn a football thread into a himseelf thread"
4. "thumbs stalker often resulting in repetitive thumb strain"
5. ignore the cunt. he's on permantent wum mission. only TIDs may know City

You'd need to make a very good psychiatrist in order to guess what next in a eight yrs long line of hatred...


In Roger Ailes/Donnie Drumpf's words: "don't know it for a fact, but many people say so..."
there must be some truth, then!
User avatar
Swales4ever
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7168
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:18 am
Location: On the Edge of Insanity
Supporter of: Sharia for Spafia
My favourite player is: an intelligent one

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Mar 14, 2010 8:09 am

john@staustell wrote:
Just what is needed. Yet another 'typical City' article. One wonders how many times these guys can re-cycle the same old material. People like him will be a tad sad when we are an established heavyweight.


Exactly. I read about one third and realised I've seen this bollocks million times before.

NOTHING in current era reminds me of "typical City". Absolutely NOTHING. Typical City would've been that Sheik had got bored of us and just dumbed us. But instead he is investing BILLION pounds on the club and the area.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby Swales4ever » Sun Mar 14, 2010 8:12 am

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
john@staustell wrote:
Just what is needed. Yet another 'typical City' article. One wonders how many times these guys can re-cycle the same old material. People like him will be a tad sad when we are an established heavyweight.


Exactly. I read about one third and realised I've seen this bollocks million times before.

NOTHING in current era reminds me of "typical City". Absolutely NOTHING. Typical City would've been that Sheik had got bored of us and just dumbed us. But instead he is investing BILLION pounds on the club and the area.



Yeah, that is the very truth.
Great post NQDP. Thanks.

1. "unintelligible language"
2. "ACID QUEEN"
3. "never once fails to turn a football thread into a himseelf thread"
4. "thumbs stalker often resulting in repetitive thumb strain"
5. ignore the cunt. he's on permantent wum mission. only TIDs may know City

You'd need to make a very good psychiatrist in order to guess what next in a eight yrs long line of hatred...


In Roger Ailes/Donnie Drumpf's words: "don't know it for a fact, but many people say so..."
there must be some truth, then!
User avatar
Swales4ever
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7168
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:18 am
Location: On the Edge of Insanity
Supporter of: Sharia for Spafia
My favourite player is: an intelligent one

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby Beefymcfc » Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:01 pm

Question:Does Mancio send them out to play like we did in the second half, or like the first half?
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby Swales4ever » Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:15 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:Question:Does Mancio send them out to play like we did in the second half, or like the first half?


Surely like first half!
Indeed he want himself and the Club to get lost. He was born moaner, too.

1. "unintelligible language"
2. "ACID QUEEN"
3. "never once fails to turn a football thread into a himseelf thread"
4. "thumbs stalker often resulting in repetitive thumb strain"
5. ignore the cunt. he's on permantent wum mission. only TIDs may know City

You'd need to make a very good psychiatrist in order to guess what next in a eight yrs long line of hatred...


In Roger Ailes/Donnie Drumpf's words: "don't know it for a fact, but many people say so..."
there must be some truth, then!
User avatar
Swales4ever
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7168
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:18 am
Location: On the Edge of Insanity
Supporter of: Sharia for Spafia
My favourite player is: an intelligent one

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby 10.Goater_Legend » Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:33 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
john@staustell wrote:
Just what is needed. Yet another 'typical City' article. One wonders how many times these guys can re-cycle the same old material. People like him will be a tad sad when we are an established heavyweight.


Exactly. I read about one third and realised I've seen this bollocks million times before.

NOTHING in current era reminds me of "typical City". Absolutely NOTHING. Typical City would've been that Sheik had got bored of us and just dumbed us. But instead he is investing BILLION pounds on the club and the area.

Spot on.
User avatar
10.Goater_Legend
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:21 am
Supporter of: City

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:19 am

Beefymcfc wrote:Question:Does Mancio send them out to play like we did in the second half, or like the first half?


considering he made the first substitution in 30 minute mark, you'd assume the latter.

I was also happy to see him pissed off to see our lads wasting time celebrating the goal and almost run to take the ball to center circle himself. That was exactly how I felt.

Truth is though that we can't afford to start games like that anymore and looking at Mancini on touchline left me with a feeling that he is going to tell that to players in no uncertain terms.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby mcfc1632 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:33 am

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Question:Does Mancio send them out to play like we did in the second half, or like the first half?


considering he made the first substitution in 30 minute mark, you'd assume the latter.

I was also happy to see him pissed off to see our lads wasting time celebrating the goal and almost run to take the ball to center circle himself. That was exactly how I felt.

Truth is though that we can't afford to start games like that anymore and looking at Mancini on touchline left me with a feeling that he is going to tell that to players in no uncertain terms.



I agree - the way his face was before the goal - and the animated way he wanted the game restarted - made me warm a bit more to him (also made me think that he wants to stay beyond the summer and that for that he needs 4th)
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:21 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Question:Does Mancio send them out to play like we did in the second half, or like the first half?


considering he made the first substitution in 30 minute mark, you'd assume the latter.

I was also happy to see him pissed off to see our lads wasting time celebrating the goal and almost run to take the ball to center circle himself. That was exactly how I felt.

Truth is though that we can't afford to start games like that anymore and looking at Mancini on touchline left me with a feeling that he is going to tell that to players in no uncertain terms.


And about bloody time to as it's been happening in most games from the Everton game in mid January.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby brite blu sky » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:59 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Question:Does Mancio send them out to play like we did in the second half, or like the first half?


considering he made the first substitution in 30 minute mark, you'd assume the latter.

I was also happy to see him pissed off to see our lads wasting time celebrating the goal and almost run to take the ball to center circle himself. That was exactly how I felt.

Truth is though that we can't afford to start games like that anymore and looking at Mancini on touchline left me with a feeling that he is going to tell that to players in no uncertain terms.


And about bloody time to as it's been happening in most games from the Everton game in mid January.


BINGO!

have been saying that since the Goodison game. Mancini got a fright in that game, you could see on his face he knew he could do nothing about it as well because he had no-one who could have come on and mixed it up with Felliani higher up the pitch.
Since that day, we have been overcautious and lacking confidence. Confidence has returned slowly but the structural problem still exists. imo he brought Vieira to try and solve this problem, by example and by experience of explaining what is required of the players to solve this problem.
At leaast now as you mention Mancini is under no illusions that this weakness still exists and he has to do something about it.. now.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
brite blu sky
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4995
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:23 pm
Location: Barcelona

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby dazby » Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:18 pm

I have finally decided. Yes he is. In a couple of seasons he will lead us to the title.
Attack the argument of the person, not the person of the argument- except Carl.
User avatar
dazby
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19308
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:02 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Ed

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby Crossie » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:43 pm

He might be, but he wont be given enough time, and we will go back to square one AGAIN. The next manager we have needs to be the appointment to end all appointments, it needs to be a big man, the right man, appointed right at the end of a season, to have a full summer, bring all his own staff in, his own style of player, and get the full summer working on systems.

At that point everyone needs to get behind the team and manager and just stop thinking about sackings.

Someone will get it right, I just hope we give them enough time.
Crossie
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9874
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:51 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Vinny

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby BobKowalski » Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:48 am

Crossie wrote:He might be, but he wont be given enough time, and we will go back to square one AGAIN. The next manager we have needs to be the appointment to end all appointments, it needs to be a big man, the right man, appointed right at the end of a season, to have a full summer, bring all his own staff in, his own style of player, and get the full summer working on systems.

At that point everyone needs to get behind the team and manager and just stop thinking about sackings.


Agreed. If it is Mancini then so be it. If it is Mourinho then ditto.
BobKowalski
Richard Dunne's Own Goals
 
Posts: 936
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:07 pm

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:16 am

BobKowalski wrote:
Crossie wrote:He might be, but he wont be given enough time, and we will go back to square one AGAIN. The next manager we have needs to be the appointment to end all appointments, it needs to be a big man, the right man, appointed right at the end of a season, to have a full summer, bring all his own staff in, his own style of player, and get the full summer working on systems.

At that point everyone needs to get behind the team and manager and just stop thinking about sackings.


Agreed. If it is Mancini then so be it. If it is Mourinho then ditto.


I'll third that.

IF Mancini is sacked then we will HAVE to get next appointment right. Someone with experience of winning and high enough profile. There's shortlist of maybe two or three candidates that would fit the criteria.

Personally I still believe Mancini is THE man for us over mid- to long term and I'd prefer us to stick with him.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby mcfc1632 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:41 am

I am still undecided - but I hope he proves his worth so that he is not sacked - would be good to see the management and supporters get behind a manager for a few years.

I know the new owners cannot be tainted by the previous mis-management that never saw stability - but there are still lessons there
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:35 am

The owners have shown their impatience already and I do hope they don't do it again.Whoever we were to get and I mean whoever including Jose is not a guarantee of immediate success. They have to back the decision they have taken and allow it/him to deliver.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: IS Bobby Mancini THE MAN?

Postby mcfc1632 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:59 am

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:The owners have shown their impatience already and I do hope they don't do it again.Whoever we were to get and I mean whoever including Jose is not a guarantee of immediate success. They have to back the decision they have taken and allow it/him to deliver.



I really think that Jose would be an instant success - we would win something next year - there would be a media wankfest for a couple of years (and amongst some supporters) - then 2 years later - perhaps 3 or 4 - he is gone....

Leaving behind an ageing squad - no improvement to youth system etc - for me he is only any good if he is kept strictly on 1st team matters and others are given authority over the development of the squad / academy etc - keeping Jose away is another good reason (apart from all the obvious ones) to want Bobby to succeed
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 169 guests