Match Thread: Stoke v Man City (FA Cup replay)

[pears12]

seriously rommel we wouldn't of beaten man utd with Hughes, I mean what is his record against united with us 3 games and 3 losses, and besides Hughes is no longer at the club so there is no point in talking about him

[Waz]

Game over now... :(

[btajim]

I'm watching until the end - but Mancini can leave now.

[Erwin Rommel]

Garrry Cook do the honourable thing resign and take Mancini with you.

[DoomMerchant]

If we had kept Hughes the following would have happened.

1) We would be in a final this weekend.
2) Robinho would still be at the club,
3) We would have signed someone better that Patrick Vieira
4) We would have beat Stoke.

2-1 shit. Mancini out.

I'd take half of those happening - and it's certain that half would've.

i believe that's probably true as well. Why though? Why with this team? I'm just depressed after that display.

And another by Stoke. Fucl me.

[LookMumImOnMCF.net]

all over

[Chinners]

gAME 'HIC' oVER

[Green in blue]

fuck mancini. and fuck that sorry shower of shite. thats useless.

[HeyMark]

Its almost fucking comical

[Dunne's Half-Time Pint]

If we had kept Hughes the following would have happened.

1) We would be in a final this weekend.
2) Robinho would still be at the club,
3) We would have signed someone better that Patrick Vieira
4) We would have beat Stoke.

2-1 shit. Mancini out.

Points 1,2,3 and 4.

Bollocks.

We were softer under Hughes than under Bobby Manc.

Not in the games that mattered.
Is Pulis a better manager than Mancini? If not - explain why not.

[Michael Brookes]

I. Am disgusted with Mancini and the rest of the club today.

[avoidconfusion]

3:1

Mancini out

[Craig B]

Embarassing is the word! It's just NEVER gonna happen for us.. NEVER!

[bluej]

Well stoke fans saying it all.

[Erwin Rommel]

If we had kept Hughes the following would have happened.

1) We would be in a final this weekend.
2) Robinho would still be at the club,
3) We would have signed someone better that Patrick Vieira
4) We would have beat Stoke.

2-1 shit. Mancini out.

Points 1,2,3 and 4.

Bollocks.

We were softer under Hughes than under Bobby Manc.

You really believe that? How many beers have you had?

[halnone]

LOL
this is fucking disgustingly hilarious.

[Mark (Blue Army)]

And we wonder why people take the piss out of us....FUCKING JOKE

[ayrshireblue]

Mancini and the players need to take a hard look at themselves. We threw away the chance to pump United in the first leg by sitting on the 2-1 lead which proved fatal at Salford, first game against Stoke we were cruising till we scored then sat back until Given had another crazy moment and came for a throw in he was never getting. Just like tonight.

[Green in blue]

If we had kept Hughes the following would have happened.

1) We would be in a final this weekend.
2) Robinho would still be at the club,
3) We would have signed someone better that Patrick Vieira
4) We would have beat Stoke.

2-1 shit. Mancini out.

Points 1,2,3 and 4.

Bollocks.

We were softer under Hughes than under Bobby Manc.

think we were a lot more likely to score under hughes. anyone who thinks were that much better under mancini should take the blue tinted glasses off

Not in the games that mattered.
Is Pulis a better manager than Mancini? If not - explain why not.

[btajim]

We were softer under Hughes than under Bobby Manc.

Not this season. Hughes made us a very difficult side to beat. ONE comprehensive defeat all season. Tottenham.