sheblue wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:guess dazby’s asleep?!
Just like our lads in front of goal!
i was going to ask wgaf ? but clearly someone does
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
sheblue wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:guess dazby’s asleep?!
Just like our lads in front of goal!
sheblue wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:guess dazby’s asleep?!
Just like our lads in front of goal!
Original Dub wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Knee jerk thread. Same position as last year after 3 games and we hit the post several times. You can’t score 5 every game, these days happen. They did last year and we smashed records.
i raised the same fucking point last week when we scored 6 but missed another 5 glorious chances
And it was even dumber then.
Nigels Tackle wrote:Original Dub wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Knee jerk thread. Same position as last year after 3 games and we hit the post several times. You can’t score 5 every game, these days happen. They did last year and we smashed records.
i raised the same fucking point last week when we scored 6 but missed another 5 glorious chances
And it was even dumber then.
where is the irish prick these days? be nice if he came on here and admitted he was wrong.....
Nigels Tackle wrote:no it wasn’t. we still missed far too many ‘easy’ chances. it was always going to catch up with us but i was ridiculed for pointing it out.
some stats on this season for you...
This season the reigning champions have compiled an astonishing 317 shots at goal in the Premier League that dwarfs Liverpool’s 154. But while Salah and co have a clinical 39% success ratio from their tally City’s languishes at nearly half that on 20.5%.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:no it wasn’t. we still missed far too many ‘easy’ chances. it was always going to catch up with us but i was ridiculed for pointing it out.
some stats on this season for you...
This season the reigning champions have compiled an astonishing 317 shots at goal in the Premier League that dwarfs Liverpool’s 154. But while Salah and co have a clinical 39% success ratio from their tally City’s languishes at nearly half that on 20.5%.
Stats
17/18 highest conversion rate in league
18/19 3rd highest conversion rate in league
19/20 11th highest conversion rate in league
What date was on OD's post?
Nigels Tackle wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:no it wasn’t. we still missed far too many ‘easy’ chances. it was always going to catch up with us but i was ridiculed for pointing it out.
some stats on this season for you...
This season the reigning champions have compiled an astonishing 317 shots at goal in the Premier League that dwarfs Liverpool’s 154. But while Salah and co have a clinical 39% success ratio from their tally City’s languishes at nearly half that on 20.5%.
Stats
17/18 highest conversion rate in league
18/19 3rd highest conversion rate in league
19/20 11th highest conversion rate in league
What date was on OD's post?
our chance conversion rate is pretty much exactly the same as over the past 3 seasons:
2017/18 - 20.8%
2018/19 - 19.4%
2019/20 - 20.4%
source: https://www.transfermarkt.us/premier-le ... on_id/2019
not good enough now. not good enough then. for a team of our quality. liverpool proving that point now with a near 40% conversion rate.
waiting eagerly for you and spazby to respond.
Nigels Tackle wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:no it wasn’t. we still missed far too many ‘easy’ chances. it was always going to catch up with us but i was ridiculed for pointing it out.
some stats on this season for you...
This season the reigning champions have compiled an astonishing 317 shots at goal in the Premier League that dwarfs Liverpool’s 154. But while Salah and co have a clinical 39% success ratio from their tally City’s languishes at nearly half that on 20.5%.
Stats
17/18 highest conversion rate in league
18/19 3rd highest conversion rate in league
19/20 11th highest conversion rate in league
What date was on OD's post?
our chance conversion rate is pretty much exactly the same as over the past 3 seasons:
2017/18 - 20.8%
2018/19 - 19.4%
2019/20 - 20.4%
source: https://www.transfermarkt.us/premier-le ... on_id/2019
not good enough now. not good enough then. for a team of our quality. liverpool proving that point now with a near 40% conversion rate.
waiting eagerly for you and spazby to respond.
nottsblue wrote:Haaland at Dortmund has had seven shots in 136 minutes on the field.
He has seven goals. Just sayin
Nigels Tackle wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:no it wasn’t. we still missed far too many ‘easy’ chances. it was always going to catch up with us but i was ridiculed for pointing it out.
some stats on this season for you...
This season the reigning champions have compiled an astonishing 317 shots at goal in the Premier League that dwarfs Liverpool’s 154. But while Salah and co have a clinical 39% success ratio from their tally City’s languishes at nearly half that on 20.5%.
Stats
17/18 highest conversion rate in league
18/19 3rd highest conversion rate in league
19/20 11th highest conversion rate in league
What date was on OD's post?
our chance conversion rate is pretty much exactly the same as over the past 3 seasons:
2017/18 - 20.8%
2018/19 - 19.4%
2019/20 - 20.4%
source: https://www.transfermarkt.us/premier-le ... on_id/2019
not good enough now. not good enough then. for a team of our quality. liverpool proving that point now with a near 40% conversion rate.
waiting eagerly for you and spazby to respond.
Spurs have had 6 shots vs Man City this season and scored 4 times. City have had 46 vs spurs and scored 2.
BlueinBosnia wrote:Dipper mate sent me this. Is it true?Spurs have had 6 shots vs Man City this season and scored 4 times. City have had 46 vs spurs and scored 2.
nottsblue wrote:Manchester City will no doubt be glad to see the back of Tottenham for a while.
budfox wrote:But...
City get perhaps five or six good chances to score in a game, with that conversion rate we score one goal. Fans say "We missed five good chances".
Compare to a shitty side, with perhaps one chance per game, maybe two. The fans barely expect them to score, they don't count a whole bunch of missed chances because they don't get a whole bunch of chances anyway.
In other words, missed chances are far more obvious when they are abundant. (In my opinion).
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carl_feedthegoat and 318 guests