johnny crossan wrote:
Razzer should be worried
Sanchez's attitude today was shocking. He was great at the ball, but totally uninterested when we were in possession. I'd be livid if i were an Arsenal fan - it was unacceptable.
johnny crossan wrote:
Razzer should be worried
mr_nool wrote:johnny crossan wrote:
Razzer should be worried
Sanchez's attitude today was shocking. He was great at the ball, but totally uninterested when we were in possession. I'd be livid if i were an Arsenal fan - it was unacceptable.
Nigels Tackle wrote:mr_nool wrote:johnny crossan wrote:
Razzer should be worried
Sanchez's attitude today was shocking. He was great at the ball, but totally uninterested when we were in possession. I'd be livid if i were an Arsenal fan - it was unacceptable.
was that the same sanchez who was chasing down the ball in the fullback position in the dying minutes of the game?
Football365 wrote:For the record, Walcott failed to create a single chance, completed three passes in the City half and had 22 touches of the ball playing wide right. Playing wide left, Sanchez had 83 touches of the ball, created two chances and won possession more times than any other player on the pitch. Game of opinions, and all that.
Mase wrote:He's been one of our better players this year and can hold his head high at the end of the season.
He's had a far better season than Sanè but for some reason Sanè has more God reviews.
Mase wrote:He's been one of our better players this year and can hold his head high at the end of the season.
He's had a far better season than Sanè but for some reason Sanè has more God reviews.
zabbadabbado wrote:Never rated him tbh.
I don’t get on his back because more often than not, he puts a shift in for us, he at least tries. He can’t shoot for toffee, more than often than not runs in to blind allies, and is easily pushed off the Ball. We give him more leeway because he is still a young player, we hope he will come good, he still might to be fair. I just don’t see it, I don’t think Guardiola rates him that much either. Just my opinion.
Sane on the other hand is natural talent, you can see his quality. He is another than is still very young. The problem with him is, sometimes he thinks he is above the Donkey work, tracking back etc. I am sure though he has a long future with us,and he will become a better all round player with age maturity. Sterling on the other hand I am not so sure about.
zabbadabbado wrote:Never rated him tbh.
I don’t get on his back because more often than not, he puts a shift in for us, he at least tries. He can’t shoot for toffee, more than often than not runs in to blind allies, and is easily pushed off the Ball. We give him more leeway because he is still a young player, we hope he will come good, he still might to be fair. I just don’t see it, I don’t think Guardiola rates him that much either. Just my opinion.
Sane on the other hand is natural talent, you can see his quality. He is another than is still very young. The problem with him is, sometimes he thinks he is above the Donkey work, tracking back etc. I am sure though he has a long future with us,and he will become a better all round player with age maturity. Sterling on the other hand I am not so sure about.
Sideshow Bob wrote:zabbadabbado wrote:Never rated him tbh.
I don’t get on his back because more often than not, he puts a shift in for us, he at least tries. He can’t shoot for toffee, more than often than not runs in to blind allies, and is easily pushed off the Ball. We give him more leeway because he is still a young player, we hope he will come good, he still might to be fair. I just don’t see it, I don’t think Guardiola rates him that much either. Just my opinion.
Sane on the other hand is natural talent, you can see his quality. He is another than is still very young. The problem with him is, sometimes he thinks he is above the Donkey work, tracking back etc. I am sure though he has a long future with us,and he will become a better all round player with age maturity. Sterling on the other hand I am not so sure about.
agree 100%. sane has a much higher ceiling imo.
johnny crossan wrote:Sideshow Bob wrote:zabbadabbado wrote:Never rated him tbh.
I don’t get on his back because more often than not, he puts a shift in for us, he at least tries. He can’t shoot for toffee, more than often than not runs in to blind allies, and is easily pushed off the Ball. We give him more leeway because he is still a young player, we hope he will come good, he still might to be fair. I just don’t see it, I don’t think Guardiola rates him that much either. Just my opinion.
Sane on the other hand is natural talent, you can see his quality. He is another than is still very young. The problem with him is, sometimes he thinks he is above the Donkey work, tracking back etc. I am sure though he has a long future with us,and he will become a better all round player with age maturity. Sterling on the other hand I am not so sure about.
agree 100%. sane has a much higher ceiling imo.
I disagree with both of you. Raheem is brave, young, skilful and has exceptional pace. His speed - particularly over the first few yards from a standing start - is a crucial asset that sets him apart.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Sterling is typical winger. They will go through patches. He is quality player though and will have more good games than bad over the season. I wiuld hate to compare him to Sane. They are both excellent and couple of bright spots and promise for better future in otherwise pretty poor season (apart from the first few months)
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Sterling is typical winger. They will go through patches. He is quality player though and will have more good games than bad over the season. I wiuld hate to compare him to Sane. They are both excellent and couple of bright spots and promise for better future in otherwise pretty poor season (apart from the first few months)
Both Sterling and Sané looked terrific playing alongside Jesus, just a short time ago before Jesus got crocked and they all seemed to be enjoying their football together.
I just wonder if it's also something to do with the chemistry which seemed to spring up between those three, a chemistry which might not be quite the same when Aguero is playing ??
Obviously, this is all supposition and I'm not criticising Aguero in any shape or form, but it was refreshing to see what our three youngsters looked as though they might, conceivably, bring to the team in spite of, as you say, the vagaries and inconsistencies that wingers can exhibit 'per se'.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bear60, C & C, carolina-blue, CTID Hants, Google [Bot] and 239 guests