craigmcfc wrote:Could someone please explain how there were just 2 minutes extra, when Kolarov was down for around 4 minutes and there were at least 4 substitutions?
I can only think that Mr Moss completely forgot about Aleks' injury.
ruralblue wrote:He probably realised "Hmmmm what if Cabaye goes on and scores!". It wouldn't have affected the three points but any remote chance if them getting a goal and Cabaye being involved he would have bee under mass scrutiny.
craigmcfc wrote:Could someone please explain how there were just 2 minutes extra, when Kolarov was down for around 4 minutes and there were at least 4 substitutions?
I can only think that Mr Moss completely forgot about Aleks' injury.
ruralblue wrote:He probably realised "Hmmmm what if Cabaye goes on and scores!". It wouldn't have affected the three points but any remote chance if them getting a goal and Cabaye being involved he would have bee under mass scrutiny.
phips wrote:ruralblue wrote:He probably realised "Hmmmm what if Cabaye goes on and scores!". It wouldn't have affected the three points but any remote chance if them getting a goal and Cabaye being involved he would have bee under mass scrutiny.
dont be delusional.
more likely referee error than corruption. or the fact that it was 4-0; just end the match. 2 mins vs. 4 mins makes no difference.
phips wrote:ruralblue wrote:He probably realised "Hmmmm what if Cabaye goes on and scores!". It wouldn't have affected the three points but any remote chance if them getting a goal and Cabaye being involved he would have bee under mass scrutiny.
dont be delusional.
more likely referee error than corruption. or the fact that it was 4-0; just end the match. 2 mins vs. 4 mins makes no difference.
craigmcfc wrote:phips wrote:ruralblue wrote:He probably realised "Hmmmm what if Cabaye goes on and scores!". It wouldn't have affected the three points but any remote chance if them getting a goal and Cabaye being involved he would have bee under mass scrutiny.
dont be delusional.
more likely referee error than corruption. or the fact that it was 4-0; just end the match. 2 mins vs. 4 mins makes no difference.
Delusional? No it doesn't matter at all does it. What if we'd scored another and that goal was the difference at the end of the season? No you're right. The title will never be decided by goal difference......
nottsblue wrote:Re the sending off of Cabaye. Utterly irrelevant if there is twenty minutes or two minutes either on the clock or left to go. The integrity of the sport and it's officiating is at stake. Cabaye is now free to play the next game where he shouldn't have giving a Palace an unfair advantage. The totting up of yellows also is part of this. Either the laws are applied correctly or they may as well not be.
Every decision counts or no decision counts
Tim777 wrote:phips wrote:ruralblue wrote:He probably realised "Hmmmm what if Cabaye goes on and scores!". It wouldn't have affected the three points but any remote chance if them getting a goal and Cabaye being involved he would have bee under mass scrutiny.
dont be delusional.
more likely referee error than corruption. or the fact that it was 4-0; just end the match. 2 mins vs. 4 mins makes no difference.
It took 4 minutes for you to be conceived, dad should have pulled out at 2
Original Dub wrote:Tim777 wrote:phips wrote:ruralblue wrote:He probably realised "Hmmmm what if Cabaye goes on and scores!". It wouldn't have affected the three points but any remote chance if them getting a goal and Cabaye being involved he would have bee under mass scrutiny.
dont be delusional.
more likely referee error than corruption. or the fact that it was 4-0; just end the match. 2 mins vs. 4 mins makes no difference.
It took 4 minutes for you to be conceived, dad should have pulled out at 2
Absolutely brilliant
Tim777 wrote:phips wrote:ruralblue wrote:He probably realised "Hmmmm what if Cabaye goes on and scores!". It wouldn't have affected the three points but any remote chance if them getting a goal and Cabaye being involved he would have bee under mass scrutiny.
dont be delusional.
more likely referee error than corruption. or the fact that it was 4-0; just end the match. 2 mins vs. 4 mins makes no difference.
Of course it makes a difference, Palace could have scored thus taking away our clean sheet, or we could have added to our goal difference. Look at what happened with Chelsea, there wouldn't have been a chance for an equaliser if the ref had blown the whistle at 97' or when the ball was kicked out of play between 97' and 99'. Refs cannot just end a game when they feel like.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests