carl_feedthegoat wrote:Wonderwall wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Wonderwall wrote:sorry mate but bad timing
IT IS TRUE THOUGH, BAD TIMING OR NOT.
TIME WILL TELL WETHER OR NOT MANCINI IS THE MAN TO TAKE US FORWARD BUT I DONT THINK ANYONE CAN ARGUE AGAINST HUGHES BEING SACKED
BostonBlue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:
TIME WILL TELL WETHER OR NOT MANCINI IS THE MAN TO TAKE US FORWARD BUT I DONT THINK ANYONE CAN ARGUE AGAINST HUGHES BEING SACKED
Don't post that often, just peruse daily but this post is a fucking laugh. It's taken until the 20th December but this surely must be the fucking half wit quote of the year!!......While all may not have been rosy I can think of many many reasons why I could argue against it....OR SHOULD THAT BE ARGUE AGAINST IT?
ant london wrote:BostonBlue wrote:quote]
TIME WILL TELL WETHER OR NOT MANCINI IS THE MAN TO TAKE US FORWARD BUT I DONT THINK ANYONE CAN ARGUE AGAINST HUGHES BEING SACKED
MARKMAKAVELI wrote:So now it suits you to get behind the manager you will do and you will encourage everyone else to. Thanks for this.
Nice one.
john68 wrote:KK,
You know that I have massive respect for you as a person and am proud to have you as a pal.
That said...your original post was absolute BULLSHIT!!!!
First of all...Hughes did NOT divide fans...it was the attitude of impatience and intolerance of the fans themselves that divided fans. To accuse Hughes of causing division or even the appointment of Hughes as causing division is to abnegate responsibility for your own decisions.
Secondly, for some one who never accepted Hughes from day 1 to now demand that now he has gone, we should all get behind our new manager, is insulting to say the least.
When Sven was sacked, there was no thought about all pulling together in support of Hughes. You never offered Hughes any support at all.
King Kev wrote:Never before have I witnessed one person creating such a divide between City fans as hughes did. There never seemed to be a gray area where he was concerned, you were either with him (happy-clapper) or against him (hughes-hater) and the 2 camps were at each others throats from the start.
Of course we will always disagree on certain topics regarding our beloved club but I hope to never again witness the polarization caused by hughes' appointment.
Now can we all please learn to live with the fact that hughes has gone, get behind Mancini and work towards one common theme.
Thank you and Merry Christmas :o)
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Appointing former rag superhero was as stupid move as any to begin with and showed Cook's complete inability to understand football supporters.
Kiss_The_Goat wrote:MARKMAKAVELI wrote:So now it suits you to get behind the manager you will do and you will encourage everyone else to. Thanks for this.
Nice one.
I know Mark, unbelievable isn't it? The morons on this site have illuminated themselves in immaculate unimaginable glowing golden star lined showers of uncontrollable, myth building, verbal super shite today. Quite breathtaking. Truly. Embarrassing. Most certainly. The hypocrisy is as laughable as it is tragic. I never thought i'd see so many fellow blues so happy at, what to any normal functioning human is another publicly embarrassing period of instability. And then after all the months of their constant boring, monotonous, bullshit they tell everybody else, that NOW its time for all fans to get together and not be divided?
To those of you who know who they are... I support my team, whoever is in charge. I'm a City fan...end of. Don't tell me when and when not get get behind the team because it suits your sad little 'anti-whatever the fuck little cock' agenda you've got going on. I dont give a shit.
I hope Mancini is a success! obviously! Does that need a thread to reinforce this point? A thread to say get behind the team??? Not for those who are ALWAYS behind the team. This thread to me appears only to serve a purpose for the morons who endorse it, because could it be that the despicable way in which they have supported their team over the last year has got them questioning their own support?
You dont need to tell me to support the City team and management in place for the Stoke game, maybe you need to tell yourselves though.
MARKMAKAVELI wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Appointing former rag superhero was as stupid move as any to begin with and showed Cook's complete inability to understand football supporters.
No, just some of them like you and others on here that can't forget the past. I'm all for rivalry and friendly banter with U***d, but some people take it too far. If they play well and win the league, I'll be happy for them. Some of you have so much bitterness and child-like behaviour towards anything U***d that it is embarassing.
Chopper wrote:Bollox.
What had people confused was a manager with limited success being appointed to guide us through Europe. Based on CVs I felt that Sven had a better chance. I didnt see any difference between Hughes, Bruce, Fat Sam, or Souness, and I dont see one now. We had a manager who paid ebay prices and sealed his fate by getting cunted by twitchy. Its done, if Mancini fucks up Ill want him gone too. No hidden agenda here I like wins.
john68 wrote:KK,
You know that I have massive respect for you as a person and am proud to have you as a pal.
That said...your original post was absolute BULLSHIT!!!!
First of all...Hughes did NOT divide fans...it was the attitude of impatience and intolerance of the fans themselves that divided fans. To accuse Hughes of causing division or even the appointment of Hughes as causing division is to abnegate responsibility for your own decisions.
Secondly, for some one who never accepted Hughes from day 1 to now demand that now he has gone, we should all get behind our new manager, is insulting to say the least.
When Sven was sacked, there was no thought about all pulling together in support of Hughes. You never offered Hughes any support at all.
King Kev wrote:I started a thread asking for City fans to get along with each other and certain knob-heads have reacted by having a go!
Ant, there are some people who have just used this thread as a vehicle to start more petty arguments. I started this thread as a genuine attempt to reduce the disharmony between blues. I don't agree that it was badly timed, in fact I can't see when else a thread such as this should have been started?ant london wrote:King Kev wrote:I started a thread asking for City fans to get along with each other and certain knob-heads have reacted by having a go!
You can't just wave a wand and expect people who have had "other knobheads" winding them up and generally spreading disharmony for 18 months to be all cheerful and feel well disposed to those "other knobheads" all of a sudden.
I don't want to be at the throats of my fellow blues and I'm sure that come the end of the week harmony will have returned to a great extent but you are deluded to think that we'll all just return to getting along great when most of "us" are (to whatever extent...) disappointed in the events of yesterday.
And some of the threads, like this one, were ill-timed IMO (and as many others have also pointed out).
I'm not looking to have a row.....I'm bored of arguing on here. But you need to look at things from the perspective of "certain knob-heads" rather than just your own.
No I haven't. It is you and the other happy-clappers who have deliberately missed the point of this whole thread and turned it into more petty arguments. I hope you are very proud.MARKMAKAVELI wrote:KK you have missed our points entirely, just as most of the Hughes Out brigade did throughout the whole saga.
I'm done with this thread now, at least it's over.
MARKMAKAVELI wrote:KK you have missed our points entirely, just as most of the Hughes Out brigade did throughout the whole saga.
I'm done with this thread now, at least it's over.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, Majestic-12 [Bot], Pretty Boy Lee and 118 guests