FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Wonderwall » Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:40 pm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24847724

Football Association tightens retrospective punishment ruling

Players guilty of violent conduct or involved in off-the-ball incidents will be punished retrospectively even if match officials saw the incident. Prior to this season, subsequent action could not be taken if a match official had seen an incident - no matter how poor their view of it was.

The FA tried to address this by adopting a rule change in the summer. But new changes, which come into force on 22 November, will further tighten the FA's disciplinary regulations. It will mean the FA can take retrospective action for violent conduct and off-the-ball incidents regardless of whether they are seen by match officials.

Fulham's Sascha Riether was the first player charged retrospectively under the initial changes to regulations governing 'not seen' incidents. However Chelsea striker Fernando Torres escaped punishment for scratching the face of Tottenham defender Jan Vertonghen in September's 1-1 draw at White Hart Lane. The latest changes cover "acts of violent conduct that occur secondarily to a challenge for the ball" and "in off-the-ball incidents where one or more match official did see the players coming together, but the match officials' view was such that none of them had the opportunity to make a decision on an act of misconduct that took place within that coming together".

FA director of governance Darren Bailey said: "This enables the FA to consider acts of violent conduct, like an elbow or a stamp, which have occurred after a challenge for the ball or coming together of players. "It is sometimes difficult for officials to see such incidents, as they are often concentrating solely on the challenge for possession of the ball, and we are mindful of this.
"Also, where off-the-ball incidents are concerned, the policy adjustment will allow action to be taken where an act of misconduct could not have been seen by the match officials, even though they may have seen some part of the players coming together.
"This is an important step forward for the game and provides an appropriate level of discretion for The FA to consider action.
"However, we remain of the view that the best outcome for all is that referees are able to make correct judgements on the day to benefit the teams involved."

FA chairman Greg Dyke expressed his dissatisfaction with the current rules in October. He said: "It is understandably baffling to everyone and must be addressed.

"As FA chairman I don't like being in a position where I can't explain why we can't take action."
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Peter Doherty (AGAIG) » Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:44 pm

They need to do something about diving, the biggest blight on the modern game.
Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7170
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:15 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Johan Cruyff

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:57 pm

So now others can be punished retrospectively, rather than just City ?

Great.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Wonderwall » Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:00 pm

Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:They need to do something about diving, the biggest blight on the modern game.



Now that is a good shout.... however, the rules of defining what is a dive will need to be clarified. For example, in spain, if you touch a player in the penalty area they will go down and cite the reason being that they are entitled to as the defender is trying to gain an unfair advantage.

That said, I would love a big crackdown on diving, cant see it happening any time soon though.... well, at least until one of our players gets away with a couple, then there will be rule changes and witch hunts
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:10 pm

I would just alert everone to the wording of that.

Read it carefully.

They have once again left a huge ref's grey area to enable Clattenburg to 'miss' Rooney's over the top two footed, potentially career ending lunge & protect him afterwards, & ban Kolarov for 3 games for pushing somebody off the ball in a handbags incident.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Original Dub » Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:14 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:I would just alert everone to the wording of that.

Read it carefully.

They have once again left a huge ref's grey area to enable Clattenburg to 'miss' Rooney's over the top two footed, potentially career ending lunge & protect him afterwards, & ban Kolarov for 3 games for pushing somebody off the ball in a handbags incident.


I read that very carefully and I'm more worried than ever to be honest.
Original Dub
 

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Nigels Tackle » Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:42 pm

any retrospective action will still be consistently inconsistent
ARMCHAIR FAN
Nigels Tackle
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18703
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: here, there, every fucking where
Supporter of: man love
My favourite player is: riyad meh!rez

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby DoomMerchant » Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:45 pm

someone has to do something to get the Rags into the top 4 this season, so it was down to Agent Gill it seems. Good for them. If you can't beat them on the pitch then legislate the fucl out of corrupt processes to ensure you get what you uhm..."deserve."

cheers
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Original Dub » Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:25 pm

So seb larsson will be banned?
Original Dub
 

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby nottsblue » Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:39 pm

Original Dub wrote:So seb larsson will be banned?


Banned?
The clueless buffoons at the FA will probably give Garcia a retrospective yellow for diving
nottsblue
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32533
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Blue2 » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:05 pm

Original Dub wrote:So seb larsson will be banned?

Just thinking exactly the same, not that it will help us now.
User avatar
Blue2
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7165
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:13 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Hanging
My favourite player is: Aguerooooooooooooooo

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Original Dub » Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:44 pm

Blue2 wrote:Just thinking exactly the same, not that it will help us now.


Exactly.

If the ref was seen to be in a good position to see an incident, they should be retrospectively banned.

Now that would sort it.
Original Dub
 

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Blue2 » Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:14 pm

Original Dub wrote:
Blue2 wrote:Just thinking exactly the same, not that it will help us now.


Exactly.

If the ref was seen to be in a good position to see an incident, they should be retrospectively banned.

Now that would sort it.


and we get a penalty for nothing at the start of the game next time we play them.
User avatar
Blue2
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7165
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:13 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Hanging
My favourite player is: Aguerooooooooooooooo

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:24 pm

Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:They need to do something about diving, the biggest blight on the modern game.


Is that so they can ban Micah for his appalling effort :)

That's 3 in a few days for me after 2 of our under 19's gave it a go last Tuesday.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Wonderwall » Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:43 pm

Can Larsson get banned retrospectively for his assault on Garcia?
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Breks » Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:46 pm

Wonderwall wrote:Can Larsson get banned retrospectively for his assault on Garcia?


No beause the ref seen it and dealt with it. Still can't believe he didn't even get booked.
Breks
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1162
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:03 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Pablo Zabaleta

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Im_Spartacus » Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:47 pm

Breks wrote:
No beause the ref seen it and dealt with it. Still can't believe he didn't even get booked.


The whole point of the thread seems to be that you can now go back and review an incident even if the reg saw it an dealt with it
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9588
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi
Supporter of: .

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:06 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:They need to do something about diving, the biggest blight on the modern game.


Is that so they can ban Micah for his appalling effort :)

That's 3 in a few days for me after 2 of our under 19's gave it a go last Tuesday.


Micah is a fucking disgrace, he belongs in the same bracket as young..both cheats.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32328
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Original Dub » Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:54 am

No word on Larsson getting punished yet??
Original Dub
 

Re: FA Retrospective Action Rule Changed

Postby Breks » Tue Nov 12, 2013 12:47 pm

carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Micah is a fucking disgrace, he belongs in the same bracket as young..both cheats.


Are you serious? Micah never even claimed for a foul, he was jumping over the tackle to avoid getting clipped.
Breks
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1162
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:03 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Pablo Zabaleta

Next

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, carl_feedthegoat, CTID Hants, Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, PeterParker, Pretty Boy Lee and 90 guests