Rule interpretations

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Rule interpretations

Postby dazby » Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:51 am

Any changes you'd like to see this season?


For me, if a free kick's been given, and the offending team loiters within 10 yards, yellow card.

Fuck off and get back your 10.
User avatar
dazby
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19308
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:02 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Ed

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:54 am

I'd like to see a sin bin brought in for back chat. It can be called the naughty step. I'm a what now? 5 minutes on the naughty step until you learn some manners.
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Chinners » Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:57 am

Disallow all goals scored after 90mins on the clock .... that'll fucl the rags points count
Image
User avatar
Chinners
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Hampton Court Palace
Supporter of: B*ll*x
My favourite player is: Kun Tueart

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:59 am

If a player is brought down outside the box, clean through on goal, the opposition has to line up ten yards behind the ball rather than ten yards in front & the same player can go 1v1 against the keeper on the ref's whistle.

Anyone encroaching gets yellow, then red card.

Professional foul becomes pointless.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Ajardine » Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:10 pm

Sin bin!! I'm a rugby player and think that the respect that the referee commands is excellent. A team mate of mine said to the ref that he was the "shittest ref he's ever had" and subsequently got red carded and handed an 11 match ban!!
Being a City fan is a lifestyle, a rollercoaster ride, but a bloody good one
Ajardine
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Micah Richard's Penalty Dives
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:02 pm
Location: Warwickshire
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Sergioooooo

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby littlebig » Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:23 pm

dazby wrote:Any changes you'd like to see this season?


For me, if a free kick's been given, and the offending team loiters within 10 yards, yellow card.

Fuck off and get back your 10.


And the ref should be more alive to taking it quickly.

Also, I'd like to see more use of advantage (play on) being given to the team who's been fouled.
User avatar
littlebig
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1295
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:24 am
Location: Dublin
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Vinnie Kompany

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Wonderwall » Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:30 pm

If a player fouls another player, resulting in him needing treatment on sidelines, then the offending player must also leave the field and only return to action with the treated player (or substitute for injured player) or after 5 mins from leaving the pitch, whichever comes first.

If a player fouls a player, meaning the player cannot continue and all that teams substitutes have been used, then the offending player must leave the field for the remainder of the game also, meaning no advantage is gained from injuring the opposition.

How do you like them onions??
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby freshie » Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:32 pm

Wonderwall wrote:If a player fouls another player, resulting in him needing treatment on sidelines, then the offending player must also leave the field and only return to action with the treated player (or substitute for injured player) or after 5 mins from leaving the pitch, whichever comes first.

If a player fouls a player, meaning the player cannot continue and all that teams substitutes have been used, then the offending player must leave the field for the remainder of the game also, meaning no advantage is gained from injuring the opposition.

How do you like them onions??


Although a good idea in theory it could make tackling a thing of the past
User avatar
freshie
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:38 pm
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Wonderwall » Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:33 pm

freshie wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:If a player fouls another player, resulting in him needing treatment on sidelines, then the offending player must also leave the field and only return to action with the treated player (or substitute for injured player) or after 5 mins from leaving the pitch, whichever comes first.

If a player fouls a player, meaning the player cannot continue and all that teams substitutes have been used, then the offending player must leave the field for the remainder of the game also, meaning no advantage is gained from injuring the opposition.

How do you like them onions??


Although a good idea in theory it could make tackling a thing of the past


Bad tackling yes, if a player is injured in a challenge the referee deems fair, then tough shit ;-)
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby SkyBlueSteve » Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:48 pm

Instant yellow card for anyone who grabs the ball after being fouled, even if it was a foul they should wait for the whistle and the ref to say its a freekick before grabbing at the ball stopping play and effectively pressuring a ref into giving the freekick regardless of the tackle
SkyBlueSteve
Danny Mills' Wages
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 8:16 pm
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Vincent Kompany

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Nigels Tackle » Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:56 pm

deliberate handball on the line = a goal
a penalty means that the defending side has a chance to get off the hook.... suarez/uruguay vs ghana....
ARMCHAIR FAN
Nigels Tackle
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18706
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: here, there, every fucking where
Supporter of: man love
My favourite player is: riyad meh!rez

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Scatman » Thu Aug 01, 2013 1:03 pm

Nigels Tackle wrote:deliberate handball on the line = a goal
a penalty means that the defending side has a chance to get off the hook.... suarez/uruguay vs ghana....


just the blatantly deliberate or the things that the referee deem to be deliberate but could actually be accidental?
Scatman
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4569
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Nigels Tackle » Thu Aug 01, 2013 1:07 pm

Scatman wrote:
Nigels Tackle wrote:deliberate handball on the line = a goal
a penalty means that the defending side has a chance to get off the hook.... suarez/uruguay vs ghana....


just the blatantly deliberate or the things that the referee deem to be deliberate but could actually be accidental?


a handball that would currently cause the ref to award a penalty
ARMCHAIR FAN
Nigels Tackle
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18706
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: here, there, every fucking where
Supporter of: man love
My favourite player is: riyad meh!rez

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Ajardine » Thu Aug 01, 2013 1:56 pm

Nigels Tackle wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Nigels Tackle wrote:deliberate handball on the line = a goal
a penalty means that the defending side has a chance to get off the hook.... suarez/uruguay vs ghana....


just the blatantly deliberate or the things that the referee deem to be deliberate but could actually be accidental?


a handball that would currently cause the ref to award a penalty


A handball from a direct shot on goal would be better
Being a City fan is a lifestyle, a rollercoaster ride, but a bloody good one
Ajardine
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Micah Richard's Penalty Dives
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:02 pm
Location: Warwickshire
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Sergioooooo

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Piccsnumberoneblue » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:06 pm

I'd like to see the match played over two thirty minute halves with a stadium clock stopped when the ball isn't in play. We'd get more action for our money and it would negate the point of time wasting and play acting when down. I think that aspect of the game frustrates fans more than any other.
Piccsnumberoneblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13353
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Weirdosville.
Supporter of: Us

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Slim » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:10 pm

Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I'd like to see the match played over two thirty minute halves with a stadium clock stopped when the ball isn't in play. We'd get more action for our money and it would negate the point of time wasting and play acting when down. I think that aspect of the game frustrates fans more than any other.


The average game has 56 minutes out of the 90 with the ball in active play, I found that a disturbing fact.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Invisible Man Fan » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:12 pm

Wonderwall wrote:If a player fouls another player, resulting in him needing treatment on sidelines, then the offending player must also leave the field and only return to action with the treated player (or substitute for injured player) or after 5 mins from leaving the pitch, whichever comes first.

If a player fouls a player, meaning the player cannot continue and all that teams substitutes have been used, then the offending player must leave the field for the remainder of the game also, meaning no advantage is gained from injuring the opposition.

How do you like them onions??


I really agree with this....I could never understand why a player who has had a pasting is penalised and sent off the pitch until the ref says he can come back on.

Stupid stupid rule

I'd also like to see players carded for being big girls blouses.....ala Nasri vs Rags. Stop them being so bloody soft

And refs to have more bollox and award fouls in the penalty area that they would definitely award outside of the box
"If we fire our manager after just one bad season - We'll become Chelsea"
"If we think we can fix the problem by buying expensive players - We'll become City"
"If we remember the good times to entertain us during the bad times - We'll become Liverpool"

So, keep calm and do it the United way


"We invest in young players, That is what we are good at — we’re not like other clubs who can spend fortunes on proven goods. We know that Manchester City are going to pay stupid money, pay silly salaries and all that. We can’t do anything about it. We concentrate on what we can do to try to bring players in for the right reasons. We invest in those who will be with the club for a long time, who will create the character of the club, who will create excitement for our fans. We are very proud of that and we are going to continue that way" - Alex Ferguson 14th May 2012
User avatar
Invisible Man Fan
Superman's Underpants
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: Hyde
Supporter of: City!!
My favourite player is: Alan

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby blues-clues » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:27 pm

Three match ban retrospective ban for diving first offence
Five match ban for second offence
User avatar
blues-clues
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2082
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:57 pm
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Joe Corrigan

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Wonderwall » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:33 pm

GK's being over protected. Referees often take the easy way out and give a foul on the keeper, many times when there has been no infringement, if anything its the GK's that do the most fouling. Especially on a corner when they clearly push the opposition player off balance before the ball arrives in the box.

The whole pushing and shoving at corners needs addressing for everyone in the box... Its about time the Assistant Ref did what his title says he should do.
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Rule interpretations

Postby Wonderwall » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:35 pm

blues-clues wrote:Three match ban retrospective ban for diving first offence
Five match ban for second offence


It could be the last game of the season and earn the team points for them win the league or get into Europe etc, depending on the team. How about forget the ban and retrospective points deduction for the team, that will stop the managers accepting it as part of the game
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Next

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, carl_feedthegoat, Mase, salford city and 106 guests