dazby wrote:If we don't concede we won't lose. If we don't concede until the team gels we will be very well placed.
CityGer wrote: I don't think changing formation regularly helps cohesion
Kladze wrote:CityGer wrote: I don't think changing formation regularly helps cohesion
I think the ability to employ a fluid tactical formation is going to be a cornerstone of Mancini's City mate.
CityGer wrote:Kladze wrote:CityGer wrote: I don't think changing formation regularly helps cohesion
I think the ability to employ a fluid tactical formation is going to be a cornerstone of Mancini's City mate.
What's your definition of a fluid tactical formation?
Kladze wrote:CityGer wrote:Kladze wrote:CityGer wrote: I don't think changing formation regularly helps cohesion
I think the ability to employ a fluid tactical formation is going to be a cornerstone of Mancini's City mate.
What's your definition of a fluid tactical formation?
Simply that Mancini has already showed us on a number of occasions that he likes to switch things with, some might say, alarming regularity.
Take the Spurs game for example. We started out with what looked to be a Christmas tree shape but as the match went on it 'evolved' to 4-3-3 ..... 4-5-1 ..... and 4-4-1-1 - all in the course of one game.
CityGer wrote:Kladze wrote:CityGer wrote:Kladze wrote:CityGer wrote: I don't think changing formation regularly helps cohesion
I think the ability to employ a fluid tactical formation is going to be a cornerstone of Mancini's City mate.
What's your definition of a fluid tactical formation?
Simply that Mancini has already showed us on a number of occasions that he likes to switch things with, some might say, alarming regularity.
Take the Spurs game for example. We started out with what looked to be a Christmas tree shape but as the match went on it 'evolved' to 4-3-3 ..... 4-5-1 ..... and 4-4-1-1 - all in the course of one game.
Perhaps Saturday was an advert for having a core formation that we stick with more often than not. I'm not against us being flexible, I'd just like us to develop a style of play and a formation that the players are comfortale with. I don't think chopping and changing every week or doing so excessively throughout the course of a game is wise.
gillie wrote:After reading a few threads on here lead me to believe that quite a lot of posters on here feel the same as myself that we are full of attacking options but we are too negative.What do you think and reasons why?
mcfc1632 wrote:gillie wrote:And please guys - Ya Ya is much more than a DM - so we have a back 4 - de jong who is an out and out DM - 2 other MFs who can both link with the attack (in turns - depending where the play is) or also cover defence and in particular Ya Ya who can really link up going forward
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 380 guests