Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby patrickblue » Fri Oct 02, 2026 2:43 pm

Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though


It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.

TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.
[img]https://giphy.com/gifs/3o7qDYcso3azifQVyg/html5[/img]
User avatar
patrickblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7618
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Whitchurch Shropshire
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: The one and only Goat

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby Swales4ever » Fri Oct 02, 2026 2:50 pm

TrueBlue4610 wrote:
Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though

Well I for one am!
IF, and it is still a big if, SM has put his own money in, so what? And if it was the AD government, also so what? Since the dawn of football, clubs have been funded by benefactor owners, usually also local and a (rich) fan, supplementing the club's earnings to better the club. That's why clubs are important parts of their community.
That only changed with FFP, which we all know was only devised to keep the cartel clubs at the top table getting fatter with no one able to challenge them. FFP has nothing to do with "protecting clubs", or football integrity.
An unjust rule will always be unjust, until someone is brave enough to stand up and fight the rule-makers. Without that mindset we'd still be living under a feudal system!
That someone is Manchester City. And we all know good always prevails over evil...

WELL SAID!
The very fact that nobody had challenged FFP for the anti-trade travesty it is will remain for me more mysterious than the magical mystery tour.
Been screaming it since 2009, hundreds of times.

1. "unintelligible language"
2. "ACID QUEEN"
3. "never once fails to turn a football thread into a himseelf thread"
4. "thumbs stalker often resulting in repetitive thumb strain"
5. ignore the cunt. he's on permantent wum mission. only TIDs may know City

You'd need to make a very good psychiatrist in order to guess what next in a eight yrs long line of hatred...


In Roger Ailes/Donnie Drumpf's words: "don't know it for a fact, but many people say so..."
there must be some truth, then!
User avatar
Swales4ever
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7251
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:18 am
Location: On the Edge of Insanity
Supporter of: Sharia for Spafia
My favourite player is: an intelligent one

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby nottsblue » Fri Oct 02, 2026 2:51 pm

TrueBlue4610 wrote:
Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though

Well I for one am!
IF, and it is still a big if, SM has put his own money in, so what? And if it was the AD government, also so what? Since the dawn of football, clubs have been funded by benefactor owners, usually also local and a (rich) fan, supplementing the club's earnings to better the club. That's why clubs are important parts of their community.
That only changed with FFP, which we all know was only devised to keep the cartel clubs at the top table getting fatter with no one able to challenge them. FFP has nothing to do with "protecting clubs", or football integrity.
An unjust rule will always be unjust, until someone is brave enough to stand up and fight the rule-makers. Without that mindset we'd still be living under a feudal system!
That someone is Manchester City. And we all know good always prevails over evil...

100% TB
nottsblue
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 34355
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby Scatman » Fri Oct 02, 2026 3:27 pm

patrickblue wrote:
Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though


It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.

TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.


It must be the case that the money didn't come directly from the sheik (as you say that would be idiotic) but they have used the emails and whatever else as evidence to come to the conclusi that it came to city from him but through the sponsors.
Scatman
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Fri Oct 02, 2026 4:03 pm

Scatman wrote:
patrickblue wrote:
Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though


It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.

TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.


It must be the case that the money didn't come directly from the sheik (as you say that would be idiotic) but they have used the emails and whatever else as evidence to come to the conclusi that it came to city from him but through the sponsors.


Hence, their final decision was based on 'just their opinion' due to the emails and ignored factual wires from the Abu Dabi government.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 33519
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby patrickblue » Fri Oct 02, 2026 4:10 pm

Scatman wrote:
patrickblue wrote:
Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though


It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.

TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.


It must be the case that the money didn't come directly from the sheik (as you say that would be idiotic) but they have used the emails and whatever else as evidence to come to the conclusion that it came to city from him but through the sponsors.




That's the point though, under FFP rules or whatever it's called now it's immaterial where money paid by a sponsor comes from. And if it's paid by the sponsors owner it's perfectly legit. The only issue is one they went for originally, which is fair value, and they've established it was, long ago.

But the "opinion" of the "independent" panel was that it came direct from the owner. That's the only way they could call foul play.
[img]https://giphy.com/gifs/3o7qDYcso3azifQVyg/html5[/img]
User avatar
patrickblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7618
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Whitchurch Shropshire
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: The one and only Goat

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby CTID Hants » Fri Oct 02, 2026 6:04 pm

These cunts just can't help themselves

This from that tin pot wannabe F365


Guardiola ruled out of next job as FA threaten Man City in 58-word statement


Pep Guardiola will not be the next England manager thanks to a legacy tainted by Manchester City’s breaches of financial fair play as the FA deliver a strong 58-word statement on the independent commission’s findings.

Buried deep in the article it says that Pep kept them waiting for 2 months before extending with us....

So in a nut shell, Pep already turned them down....

Utter cunts literally making stories up knowing the average thick cunt .won't read the full article and go off the geadline and opening paragraph.....
Born A Blue

Image
User avatar
CTID Hants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Yaya's Wembley Winning Strikes
 
Posts: 15487
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: Farnborough, Hampshire

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby Scatman » Fri Oct 02, 2026 6:21 pm

carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Scatman wrote:
patrickblue wrote:
Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though


It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.

TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.


It must be the case that the money didn't come directly from the sheik (as you say that would be idiotic) but they have used the emails and whatever else as evidence to come to the conclusi that it came to city from him but through the sponsors.


Hence, their final decision was based on 'just their opinion' due to the emails and ignored factual wires from the Abu Dabi government.


Certainly looks that way.

But then the decision handed down by a jury in any trial is essentially just an opinion.
Scatman
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby Hazy2 » Fri Oct 02, 2026 7:58 pm

Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9927
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby TrueBlue4610 » Fri Oct 02, 2026 8:01 pm

Scatman wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Scatman wrote:
patrickblue wrote:
Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though


It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.

TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.


It must be the case that the money didn't come directly from the sheik (as you say that would be idiotic) but they have used the emails and whatever else as evidence to come to the conclusi that it came to city from him but through the sponsors.


Hence, their final decision was based on 'just their opinion' due to the emails and ignored factual wires from the Abu Dabi government.


Certainly looks that way.

But then the decision handed down by a jury in any trial is essentially just an opinion.


It's an opinion based on hearing and weighing up all the evidence, not just ignoring one side as it doesn't fit the pre-arranged verdict. Just saying...
TrueBlue4610
Lee Bradbury's Price Tag
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2026 7:56 am
Location: County Durham
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Any CB

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby nottsblue » Fri Oct 02, 2026 8:23 pm

nottsblue
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 34355
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby salford city » Fri Oct 02, 2026 9:01 pm

nottsblue wrote:https://www.skysports.com/football/news/13594421/man-city-owners-cannot-retain-status-if-guilty-verdict-stands-after-appeal-says-gary-neville


Hope we ban this cunt forever


There continues to be a lot of people '(usual suspects) assuming the status quo. They don't or won't imagine a situation where the PL are proven to be wrong. Time will tell. Bookmark these pages they will be getting it back in spades if we get this overturned.
Your job is cleaning boots
salford city
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7002
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby salford city » Sat Oct 03, 2026 6:04 am

Man City whistleblower to lose witness protection - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/ar ... vrp78ddvqo

Interested in finding out who paid this character originally.
Your job is cleaning boots
salford city
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7002
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby Scatman » Sat Oct 03, 2026 6:14 am

Hazy2 wrote:Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’


UAE threatens Burnham over Man City: We’ll pull billions out of UK
Prime Minister under pressure as Gulf state warns it will withdraw investment in retaliation for Premier League row
Scatman
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby salford city » Sat Oct 03, 2026 6:35 am

Scatman wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’


UAE threatens Burnham over Man City: We’ll pull billions out of UK
Prime Minister under pressure as Gulf state warns it will withdraw investment in retaliation for Premier League row


Love this. Saw something yesterday saying we should not be able to exert political power over the outcome - ha, fuck that. Its okfor the media to push the agenda of the red cartel though I guess. You can see the exit strategy for the PL and it's supporters forming - loophole and political influence
Your job is cleaning boots
salford city
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7002
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby sheblue » Sat Oct 03, 2026 7:17 am

salford city wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’


UAE threatens Burnham over Man City: We’ll pull billions out of UK
Prime Minister under pressure as Gulf state warns it will withdraw investment in retaliation for Premier League row


Love this. Saw something yesterday saying we should not be able to exert political power over the outcome - ha, fuck that. Its okfor the media to push the agenda of the red cartel though I guess. You can see the exit strategy for the PL and it's supporters forming - loophole and political influence


There are no morals in a bitter dog fight.

I dont give a fuck what anyone thinks we should use all means possible to defend ourselves against the cartel league and their masses of media cronies.
We are facing a tsunami of bitter hate, lies, resentment and misinformation. Make no mistske they want to kill us.
Keep the gloves off.
I for one sincerely hope tge league burns. It is what has to happen
sheblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13078
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:28 pm
Supporter of: city
My favourite player is: silva

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby salford city » Sat Oct 03, 2026 7:29 am

sheblue wrote:
salford city wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’


UAE threatens Burnham over Man City: We’ll pull billions out of UK
Prime Minister under pressure as Gulf state warns it will withdraw investment in retaliation for Premier League row


Love this. Saw something yesterday saying we should not be able to exert political power over the outcome - ha, fuck that. Its okfor the media to push the agenda of the red cartel though I guess. You can see the exit strategy for the PL and it's supporters forming - loophole and political influence


There are no morals in a bitter dog fight.

I dont give a fuck what anyone thinks we should use all means possible to defend ourselves against the cartel league and their masses of media cronies.
We are facing a tsunami of bitter hate, lies, resentment and misinformation. Make no mistske they want to kill us.
Keep the gloves off.
I for one sincerely hope tge league burns. It is what has to happen


100% no way are we backing down from this point onwards.
Your job is cleaning boots
salford city
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7002
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby Scatman » Sat Oct 03, 2026 7:35 am

sheblue wrote:
salford city wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’


UAE threatens Burnham over Man City: We’ll pull billions out of UK
Prime Minister under pressure as Gulf state warns it will withdraw investment in retaliation for Premier League row


Love this. Saw something yesterday saying we should not be able to exert political power over the outcome - ha, fuck that. Its okfor the media to push the agenda of the red cartel though I guess. You can see the exit strategy for the PL and it's supporters forming - loophole and political influence


There are no morals in a bitter dog fight.

I dont give a fuck what anyone thinks we should use all means possible to defend ourselves against the cartel league and their masses of media cronies.
We are facing a tsunami of bitter hate, lies, resentment and misinformation. Make no mistske they want to kill us.
Keep the gloves off.
I for one sincerely hope tge league burns. It is what has to happen


I hope we win the battle and then leave the Premier League of our own volition. I can't go on caring about the PL any more after this and would welcome a European Super League.
Scatman
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby Hazy2 » Sat Oct 03, 2026 7:39 am

If we are scattergunning. Let’s drop the email trail of the scousers hacking our recruitment software. Like they wouldn’t!!!! Burn the whole house down, drop them say next Wednesday….. The moral compass of a rattle snake no disrespect to snakes!!!!! The respectful approach has got us nowhere!!
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9927
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Kangaroo panel finds us guilty

Postby Crossie » Sat Oct 03, 2026 7:41 am

Almost all footballers are academically bereft. That certainly includes Gary Neville and Jamie Carragher. Both of them are paid in an economy of opinion. Without opinion they are irrelevant. So they have to have strong and clear opinions to exist. Those opinions are created in brains with iq’s of less than 80.

It’s like believing what a 10 year old child says.

Journalists are the same.

By even reading it, you pay them and damage your mental health tiny bit by tiny bit
Crossie
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9953
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:51 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Vinny

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], ian494, salford city, sharkey, Wooders and 521 guests