Football Media

[Indianablue]

I wonder if we’ve allowed these people to keep going without saying anything so that they dig their own grave? Plenty have referred to us openly as “cheats”. Professionals have said this live on their media channels.

I wonder if we’ve let them do this so we could just build a case against them all.

If you can get done for £90k everytime you call someone a Pedo, i'm sure they could make the abusers that call us cheats can get done for a few bob

[MIAMCFC]

A lot of clowns like Jordan, spit and Neville and lots of pundits are exposed, due to there allegiance to there
Clubs or in Jordan’s case wild speculation. Barristers don’t. City have kept to the NDA.

The above have been drip fed from someone. Strap in is all I would say to them !! SKY along with many others
May well have done us a favour, and in turn got Masters out of the blackest hole. Pretty sure the chats between both legal experts will have been
Comedy gold, a lot of FFS from the PREMIER team and skipping to the office ours.

Collymore as recent as last week suggesting that our CL win shouldn’t be counted because we’re “cheats”

Dogger Championship winner ! Where is he now.

[Blue In Bolton]

I wonder if we’ve allowed these people to keep going without saying anything so that they dig their own grave? Plenty have referred to us openly as “cheats”. Professionals have said this live on their media channels.

I wonder if we’ve let them do this so we could just build a case against them all.

Sounds like it, doesn't it? I sincerely hope so.

[Original Dub]

I'd love if this was true.

There's definitely grounds for it. I've never seen so many people allowed so many media platforms to defame without any recourse whatsoever.

Half the stuff is straight out libellous. No use of the word "allegedly".

It's the greatest artificial coping mechanism ever assembled in the history of sport and it's snowballed into something so massive at this stage that there's going to be a huge fallout when it all comes out in the wash

[zuricity]

^^^^^^

Yeah with all those sweaty arab shirts , shorts and socks the "Sports Wash".

[Harry Dowd scored]

Just look at this shit, am furious -:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... eague.html

[Mase]

Just look at this shit, am furious -:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... eague.html

“writes RIATH AL-SAMARRAI..”

Two weeks ago the same “journalist” wrote about “poor tired Tiger Woods”

Wonder why he got his job…. *tick*

[Original Dub]

The coping mechanism is there to be used before each city game and in abundance after each city win.

We beat forest today and wait until you see what they write tomorrow.

I can see the future

[MIAMCFC]

The Mail, like an Arsenal fan runs the back page. Add this comic to the list.

[carl_feedthegoat]

I think Arsenal owe us a huge THANK YOU for playing as shit as we possibly can and yet we still win......fucking hilarious.

[Nick]

Can't find the news on here anywhere that all clubs bar Chelsea (abstained), us, scum and villa all voted for spending cap..

[zuricity]

Can't find the news on here anywhere that all clubs bar Chelsea (abstained), us, scum and villa all voted for spending cap..

Beeb now have an article about it and show City way ahead of anyone else in Revenue. 65 mill ahead of the Rags.

16 from 20 , three of the sixteen will be relegated, further crimping the finances of the three coming up from the Championship.

A good old 20 year experienced Lawyer specialising in Company Law would pull holes in this agreement or he'd have to be a loony

[Harry Dowd scored]

Can't find the news on here anywhere that all clubs bar Chelsea (abstained), us, scum and villa all voted for spending cap..

e-mail
158
shares
97
View comments
Premier League clubs have agreed to continue working on introducing a hard spending cap from the start of the 2025-26 season as part of a new system of financial controls to replace the much-maligned Profit and Sustainability Rules.

Under proposals to be formally voted on at the Premier League's AGM in June, all clubs' spending on transfers, wages and agent fees will be limited to around five times the amount earned by the top-flight's bottom club in TV and prize money, which was £100.3million for Southampton last season.

Manchester United, Manchester City and Aston Villa all voted against the new system known as 'anchoring' at a meeting in London on Monday, with Chelsea abstaining, but with 16 clubs in favour the new restrictions are expected to be agreed at their end of season meeting.


While the precise ratio has yet to be determined the new rules are expected to 'anchor' spending to around five times the income of the bottom club, amounting to around £500m.

The clubs have also yet to agree whether the new limits would apply to their entire staff costs or just player wages.

[Mase]

Premier League just desperate for the Super League to come in. Muppets

[zuricity]

Premier League just desperate for the Super League to come in. Muppets

Expect a law suit from Fozzy and Kermit. Comparing those top guys to the wallies at the PL. Oh shit, Waldo will be after us now.

[Original Dub]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... ction.html

[carolina-blue]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html

It will never end mate will it , So three teams and an abstainer But it will stop Manchester City payroll gymnastics , not a dickie bird on the others laughable

[CTID Hants]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html

Utter scouse supporting cunt, wanna talk Heysel?,

[john@staustell]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html

Just left him a comment on that one. Funny how he didn't mention the objection of United

[carl_feedthegoat]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html

Just left him a comment on that one. Funny how he didn't mention the objection of United

Nice one

I really enjoyed reading this one as well.

''Well done Ian. Any excuse to roll out anti-City nonsense. Your own words state that it is Chelsea who would be guilty, not City, a club that is well run from top to bottom, but constantly accused, not charged, with FFP, PSR and now, because all of that has failed, a wage-cap that they are adhering to anyway!
The word on the street in Manchester is that the 115 allegations actually boil down to just 5 rule breaches. 3 of them are for not assisting the PL with their investigation. But Forest and Everton did, and still got found guilty. There's not a sane person in history who assists their accusers in a trial.
The smart people are saying that the delay is due to agreeing an exit strategy that saves face for the Premier League, because they'll look very silly if they tell the truth, that there is no case to answer. The newspapers will also look silly for continually jumping on the bandwagon with no proof.
It is believed that litigation will follow, from City, against all those who were too quick and eager to damage reputation and integrity.
I'm looking forward to PGMOL like apologies and fines when the truth comes out! Shame, Shame, Shame...''