Haaland watch

[PeterParker]

And now we know why Uefa are getting rid of FFP All set up for Barca or Real to carry on their ridiculous spending.

If it’s £150m move on. I’ve said all along I’d be happy with Martínez at Inter. Would prefer Haaland, but Martínez would score a shed load in this team.

I would avoid Martinez at any cost. He is an expensive Gabby Jesus.

[Niall Quinns Discopants]

And now we know why Uefa are getting rid of FFP All set up for Barca or Real to carry on their ridiculous spending.

If it’s £150m move on. I’ve said all along I’d be happy with Martínez at Inter. Would prefer Haaland, but Martínez would score a shed load in this team.

Also, I've rarely seen striker who looks so much like "Pep player" as Martinez does. Could have been him all along.

[sheblue]

People seem to think now were letting Sergio go that this somehow means we are getting Haaland.

Not so sure its that simple.

[PeterParker]

I think we must pay no matter how much for this fella.
He is one that will score the winner in a day when we are shit.

My biggest fear is that we will go in a transfer bid with the rags for him and we will not pay as much as Dortmund want, while the red filth will.
Him in the swamp is a fucking nightmare.

[Blue Noodle]

Would absolutely love it if City sign him but I don't think it will be a case of City paying whatever it takes. The Spafia will have their max price set and will walk away if a bidding war puts him above that. I can also see Pep being happy to go with Kev as a false 9 and Gabriel as backup.

Having said that, I think City will be his only option if Dortmund sell. Barca can't afford him, probably the same for PSG and Real will go for Mbappe. Norfolking chance he'll go to the rags.

[Hazy2]

If Haaland has a choice I hope his old man lying stricken at the swamp with the cunt Keane getting a standing ovation for the assault on his dad will have some bearing on his decision.

[Dimples]

People seem to think now were letting Sergio go that this somehow means we are getting Haaland.

Not so sure its that simple.

I think the opposite.
My guess is a deal is in place for Kun's replacement.
That rules out both Haaland and Kane.


Because everyone now knows that we must buy this Summer that weakens our negotiating position and leaves us open to being ripped off.
We never pay over the odds and we walk away when we are being ripped off, for ex, Maguire, Sanchez, etc..

We only avoid the ripped off scenario if a deal is already done?

[Hazy2]

People seem to think now were letting Sergio go that this somehow means we are getting Haaland.

Not so sure its that simple.

I think the opposite.
My guess is a deal is in place for Kun's replacement.
That rules out both Haaland and Kane.


Because everyone now knows that we must buy this Summer that weakens our negotiating position and leaves us open to being ripped off.
We never pay over the odds and we walk away when we are being ripped off, for ex, Maguire, Sanchez, etc..

We only avoid the ripped off scenario if a deal is already done?

It’s possible Haaland or Kane have said yes, as number 1 forward?

[PeterParker]

People seem to think now were letting Sergio go that this somehow means we are getting Haaland.

Not so sure its that simple.

I think the opposite.
My guess is a deal is in place for Kun's replacement.
That rules out both Haaland and Kane.


Because everyone now knows that we must buy this Summer that weakens our negotiating position and leaves us open to being ripped off.
We never pay over the odds and we walk away when we are being ripped off, for ex, Maguire, Sanchez, etc..

We only avoid the ripped off scenario if a deal is already done?

It’s possible Haaland or Kane have said yes, as number 1 forward?

I was thinking, we all are worried about how this can drag on with Levi, but if I recall, there were no issues when we signed Walker, right? It did not drag on for ages.

[Mase]

Fuck me, if we get Harry Kane I’ll probably watch even less matches than I do now. The guys a prick!

[patrickblue]

People seem to think now were letting Sergio go that this somehow means we are getting Haaland.

Not so sure its that simple.

I think the opposite.
My guess is a deal is in place for Kun's replacement.
That rules out both Haaland and Kane.


Because everyone now knows that we must buy this Summer that weakens our negotiating position and leaves us open to being ripped off.
We never pay over the odds and we walk away when we are being ripped off, for ex, Maguire, Sanchez, etc..

We only avoid the ripped off scenario if a deal is already done?

It’s possible Haaland or Kane have said yes, as number 1 forward?

I think it's probable TBH, hence the timing of the Kun announcment.
I just pray to god it's not Kane

[blues2win]

I can absolutely believe that Haaland’s camp have given every encouragement to City but Txiki and Ferran have to do the deal with Dortmund. They will sell him dear. Far from being a done deal surely.

[Mase]

No chance of Torres being a false nine for us?

[Tokyo Blue]

Fuck me, if we get Harry Kane I’ll probably watch even less matches than I do now. The guys a prick!

This.

[salford city]

Fuck me, if we get Harry Kane I’ll probably watch even less matches than I do now. The guys a prick!

This.

I would like to join this club as well. No way will or should we be in for Kane

[sheblue]

I would rather have Lukaku than Kane.
And I think Lukaku is shit.

[CTID Hants]

I would rather have Lukaku than Kane.
And I think Lukaku is shit.

At least you don't have to mute the TV when Lukaku does a post match interview...............

[PeterParker]

What's the hate with Kane?
I don't want him either, but why the hate? He looks a decent bloke with his head over his shoulders, a true pro.

[Tokyo Blue]

What's the hate with Kane?
I don't want him either, but why the hate? He looks a decent bloke with his head over his shoulders, a true pro.

He's a dirty, snide little shithouse. See the "challenges" on Delph in the away champions league game, on Sterling in a home match (or was it de Bruyne - the point stands anyway). There is also a tweet I saw of him the other week elbowing an arsenal player in the head from behind. And he dives. Regularly. I can think of no circumstances under which I would want him at City. Let him stay and rot with mourinho, who is the ideal manager the kind of person kane is.

[Mase]

What's the hate with Kane?
I don't want him either, but why the hate? He looks a decent bloke with his head over his shoulders, a true pro.

He's a dirty, snide little shithouse. See the "challenges" on Delph in the away champions league game, on Sterling in a home match (or was it de Bruyne - the point stands anyway). There is also a tweet I saw of him the other week elbowing an arsenal player in the head from behind. And he dives. Regularly. I can think of no circumstances under which I would want him at City. Let him stay and rot with mourinho, who is the ideal manager the kind of person kane is.

The tactical backing in just as a defender jumps is 100% aimed at injuring the defender. He’s a twat. In the same way Shearer used to throw his elbows when going up for a header.