The mancityfans.net football forum

Mase wrote:

nottsblue wrote:

PrezIke wrote:Bottom line if I were told I had to pick where Haaland goes next I would not bet any significant amount of money on us signing him.

I will bookmark this.

I concur

I don’t think we’ll be in for him personally, so I agree. I’m not sure who Prez is arguing with.

Should we be in for Haaland? Absolutely. That’s what we’re all saying.

But to say “Haaland won’t come unless we win the Champions League” is fuckin ridiculous

I’d hope we were in the mix for him as well. Aguero arguably has this season left as a 25/30 goal a year forward, (and I’m not convinced he will get over 20 this season as it goes, he is clearly not at all fit), and thus as we’ve all said for a season or so, needs replacing. And Haaland is one of a handful of young strikers who fits the bill of what we want

Just can’t see it happening for a number of reasons, and non footballing reasons to boot

It's a difficult one (Haaland) but the lad is an absolute beast. We should at least be trying.

sheblue wrote:It's a difficult one (Haaland) but the lad is an absolute beast. We should at least be trying.

Unless already at Bayern we can outbid anyone plus the Sancho sell on and Rodri.

Just another four goals for Haaland yesterday.

Mase wrote:Just another four goals for Haaland yesterday.

No Brainier, if we don’t get him what is the plan.

Mase wrote:Just another four goals for Haaland yesterday.

Not "just another four goals " , have you seen them ?

All well taken , but no defenders en masse , like we see every week with City. Any players will struggle to get through such packed defenses . Haaland is a big bugger too , He would struggle like our strikers do now.

Mase wrote:Just another four goals for Haaland yesterday.

Don't get your hopes up. We got a million squids in the bank but we'll be shopping at pound land. We're all about principles, we won't bend over to a dodgy agent