Page 13 of 17

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:58 pm
by Beefymcfc
They had to win, more than happy with that.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:59 pm
by Nigels Tackle
john@staustell wrote:Just glad not to lose. I could see a smash and grab there


seriously?!
they were never at the races

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:59 pm
by zuricity
sidSmith wrote:So for all the talking to and pointing at his watch for wasting time, he added 50 seconds.


The ref got away with a lot of mistakes tonight because the rags were crap.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:59 pm
by gmercer1
Only thing that oissed me off tonight apart from the missed chances was Not bringing Jesus on earlier.
As soon as he comes on we seem to go up a gear

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:59 pm
by mr_nool
Navas was more of a threat than Sterling tonight.
Just sayin.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:00 pm
by patrickblue
Rags are so fukin boring.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:00 pm
by Beefymcfc
john@staustell wrote:Just glad not to lose. I could see a smash and grab there

Ha ha ha, not just me.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:01 pm
by BrianF
Nigels Tackle wrote:
john@staustell wrote:Just glad not to lose. I could see a smash and grab there


seriously?!
they were never at the races

I agree but how many times have we been sucker punched this season?

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:01 pm
by gmercer1
They didn't have a shot on target did they?

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:01 pm
by london blue 2
Ref was ok apart from the infuriating timewasting.
We were terrible
They were worse.

Should have battered them. I have to question why we cannot score (enough) goals under pep.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:02 pm
by patrickblue
mr_nool wrote:
JamieMCFC wrote:
mr_nool wrote:
Mase wrote:Offside or not?


I think not, but we only got one replay.


He was offside.


Wasn't the ball level?


It looked offside to me, but he was unfortunate as it looked like he realised he was off as the pass came in and he moved back on.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:02 pm
by PeterParker
We are gash, but how on the FLYING FUCK OF FUCKSVILLE this submediocre team lead by Maureen is just one point behind us is beyond my understanding.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:03 pm
by sidSmith
Beefymcfc wrote:They had to win, more than happy with that.

Hardly showed any desire to win though did they?

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:03 pm
by Dub City
They were scared shitless and did like all small teams do against us defended their box with 8 players and hoofed ball out. We didn't get theluck we need but we didn't create enough clear chances. Glad to see that bogbrush cunt finally get a red against us should have been off each time he played us

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:03 pm
by Beefymcfc
So, when will we hear about the anti-football that the Rags play? Not even up for a fight, the fucking shit bags.

Let all the cunts know, they're fuck all.

Edit:. Ha ha ha, the Rags acknowledge they play for a point. Their fans must be impressed.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:04 pm
by Tokyo Blue
gmercer1 wrote:They didn't have a shot on target did they?

Bournemouth did more against us. Mind you, they have got a manager with some balls and actually tried to score.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:04 pm
by sheblue
Happy enough with that. They did defend very well. That bus was well oiled.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:04 pm
by Tokyo Blue
sheblue wrote:Happy enough with that. They did defend very well. That bus was well oiled.

Easy to say you've got a good defence when it is all 11 men.

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:04 pm
by zuricity
mr_nool wrote:Navas was more of a threat than Sterling tonight.
Just sayin.


just saying something stupid?
no he certainly was not he was gash . could not even get to the byline against tired legs . Ffs he is a winger !

Re: *** city v the rags *** official match thread

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:05 pm
by london blue 2
My missus who hates football said that guy commenting was a disgrace. Making excuses for rags all night. Embarrassing