Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby Justified logic » Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:53 am

Not heard anything myself yet.

All pundits saying it should have been a penalty and a red card. Walker has admitted it. Surely merely a formality now? - that he will miss the FA Cup game at home to the mighty Wycombe Wanderers(!)
Justified logic
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:40 pm
Location: Playing in the hole
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:56 am

Has there ever been retrospective action for anything other than violent conduct charges?
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby Feed The Goat » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:01 pm

Doesn't help us so I'm not really bothered if he gets fined banned or whatever
Mcf.net best app in the land and all the world
Feed The Goat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1679
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: Blackley

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby freshie » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:34 pm

Not a chance
User avatar
freshie
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 7:38 pm
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby sheblue » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:39 pm

Brown envelope in the post.
sheblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11893
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:28 pm
Supporter of: city
My favourite player is: silva

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby iwasthere2012 » Mon Jan 23, 2017 1:53 pm

Who cares.
The damage is done.
Image
iwasthere2012
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9845
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:14 pm
Location: Dublin
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva (was PabZab)

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby Moonchesteri » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:02 pm

But wouldn't it have been just a yellow even if we had got the penalty with the new rules?
Moonchesteri
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:58 pm
Location: Blue moon
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby phips » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:06 pm

Moonchesteri wrote:But wouldn't it have been just a yellow even if we had got the penalty with the new rules?

no. the triple jeopardy thing dent apply here since one of the exceptions to that is a push, which is what Walker did. would've been a red.
I'm not really a City fan. I'm just here for attention.

Barclays Premier League 2011-2012 CHAMP1-6NS
Barclays Premier League 2013-2014 CHAMP156NS
Barclays Premier League 2017-2018 CHAMP100NS
Barclays Premier League 2018-2019 CHAMP14ONS
Barclays Premier League 2020-2021 CHAM21ONS
Barclays Premier League 2021-2022 CHAM93ONS
Barclays Premier League 2022-2023 CHAM3XIONS
2022-2023 Domestic & European TR3BLE WINNERS
phips
Denis Tueart's Overhead
 
Posts: 8333
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:04 pm
Location: California
Supporter of: Man City, Dortmund
My favourite player is: David Silva, Marco Reus

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:08 pm

phips wrote:
Moonchesteri wrote:But wouldn't it have been just a yellow even if we had got the penalty with the new rules?

no. the triple jeopardy thing dent apply here since one of the exceptions to that is a push, which is what Walker did. would've been a red.


The wording of the rule:

A foul on a running striker committed by the last man of the defence will no longer result in a direct red card and suspension, unless the foul is violent or consists in a hand-ball in the box. As long as the foul is judged to be an honest attempt at taking the ball, the defender will only be shown a yellow card.
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby blues2win » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:38 pm

It wasn't an honest attempt to get the ball. Red.
blues2win
Bert Trautmann's Neck
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:03 am
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: david silva

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby iwasthere2012 » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:11 pm

That's how Howard Webb and just about everyone else interpreted it.
Image
iwasthere2012
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9845
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:14 pm
Location: Dublin
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva (was PabZab)

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby Hazy2 » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:50 pm

Sterling banned for 3 games for Yaya saying he should have gone down. :lol: plus Ferna 1 given an extra game for wearing jeans and flip flops in January.
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9311
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby zuricity » Tue Jan 24, 2017 7:25 pm

Hazy2 wrote:Sterling banned for 3 games for Yaya saying he should have gone down. :lol: plus Ferna 1 given an extra game for wearing jeans and flip flops in January.


if Sterling had scored that cnut of a ref would have pulled it back for a free kick on the edge of the box.
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
zuricity
Joe Corrigan's Gloves
 
Posts: 16936
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby nottsblue » Tue Jan 24, 2017 7:52 pm

If Walker had pulled out a Stanley knife and slashed Sterling he still wouldn't be retrospectively punished. More likely Sterling would be in trouble for inciting trouble.

To be honest I don't have a problem with Walker committing the foul as it's up to the match officials to spot it and punish it. Also, admitting it after is fair game and it's then up to the administrators of the game to punish him. The fact they haven't and won't speaks more about where they are at
nottsblue
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 29809
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby zuricity » Tue Jan 24, 2017 7:59 pm

nottsblue wrote:If Walker had pulled out a Stanley knife and slashed Sterling he still wouldn't be retrospectively punished. More likely Sterling would be in trouble for inciting trouble.

To be honest I don't have a problem with Walker committing the foul as it's up to the match officials to spot it and punish it. Also, admitting it after is fair game and it's then up to the administrators of the game to punish him. The fact they haven't and won't speaks more about where they are at


indeed like when our defender tweeted 10 versus 12, and got a fine. Surely admitting you did something wrong in the media ( which ever form) is a punishable offense? Sagna thinks so now.
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
zuricity
Joe Corrigan's Gloves
 
Posts: 16936
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby zuricity » Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:00 pm

nottsblue wrote:If Walker had pulled out a Stanley knife and slashed Sterling he still wouldn't be retrospectively punished. More likely Sterling would be in trouble for inciting trouble.

To be honest I don't have a problem with Walker committing the foul as it's up to the match officials to spot it and punish it. Also, admitting it after is fair game and it's then up to the administrators of the game to punish him. The fact they haven't and won't speaks more about where they are at


indeed like when our defender tweeted 10 versus 12, and got a fine. Surely admitting you did something wrong in the media ( which ever form) is a punishable offense? Sagna thinks so now.
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
zuricity
Joe Corrigan's Gloves
 
Posts: 16936
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: Any word on a retrospective ban for Walker?

Postby zuricity » Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:00 pm

nottsblue wrote:If Walker had pulled out a Stanley knife and slashed Sterling he still wouldn't be retrospectively punished. More likely Sterling would be in trouble for inciting trouble.

To be honest I don't have a problem with Walker committing the foul as it's up to the match officials to spot it and punish it. Also, admitting it after is fair game and it's then up to the administrators of the game to punish him. The fact they haven't and won't speaks more about where they are at


indeed like when our defender tweeted 10 versus 12, and got a fine. Surely admitting you did something wrong in the media ( which ever form) is a punishable offense? Sagna thinks so now.
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
zuricity
Joe Corrigan's Gloves
 
Posts: 16936
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch


Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CTID Hants, Harry Dowd scored, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Outcast, stupot and 379 guests