The mancityfans.net football forum

Just on the off chance anyone from his 'camp' reads the boards:

We all know you were referring to the strong vocal support of the AWAY FANS when you mentioned ten against twelve and I hope you clarify this for the FA since they decided to stick their fat whiskey soaked nose into it.

Or his finger slipped and he meant to put 12....I mean 11 .... see its easily done

10 against 12 and yet our players shake Mason's hand at the end.

Context?

What happend?

PeterParker wrote:Context?

What happend?

Deleted instagram post talking about 10 against 12 which the (decrepid ancient and well past retirement age) FA have asked him to explain, he has until 5pm tonight. Clearly referencing their strong away following though. There's nothing else it could have been about.

Dameerto wrote:

PeterParker wrote:Context?

What happend?

Deleted instagram post talking about 10 against 12 which the (decrepid ancient and well past retirement age) FA have asked him to explain. Clearly referencing their strong away following though. There's nothing else it could have been about.

It could be he meant having gone down to10
Men coupled with Burnleys fast speed of play
And intricate slick passing
It seemed like they had an Extra Man on the field !!& it was like we were playing against 12 men ,

Dameerto wrote:

PeterParker wrote:Context?

What happend?

Deleted instagram post talking about 10 against 12 which the (decrepid ancient and well past retirement age) FA have asked him to explain, he has until 5pm tonight. Clearly referencing their strong away following though. There's nothing else it could have been about.

Cheers.

What a bunch of clowns. Clearly, no agenda against us.

PeterParker wrote:

Dameerto wrote:

PeterParker wrote:Context?

What happend?

Deleted instagram post talking about 10 against 12 which the (decrepid ancient and well past retirement age) FA have asked him to explain, he has until 5pm tonight. Clearly referencing their strong away following though. There's nothing else it could have been about.

Cheers.

What a bunch of clowns. Clearly, no agenda against us.

Clearly the Russians have infested his account. It's so easy these days.

This predictive text/autocorrect is a bugger, you know.

Typo. Tthese fiddly little keyboarrs on mobile devicesd are toop small for a grown mann's fiungers. Who hasn't pressed the wwrong keyu sometimesd?

Fucking ridiculous shit, the FA going after him on something that can be interpreted in many ways.

It's the equivalent of the media push to get mancini charged for waving an "imaginary card".

If it's imaginary, how the fuck do you know it's a card??

How can they prove what he meant? It's fucking stupid to even ask him.

Idiots on a fucking crusade.

If they were a proper organisation they'd be calling having a full review of the refereeing system in premier league and asking why it's getting worse instead of better.

You know, going after the problem, instead of those pointing the problem out.

Cunts.

I hope he comes out and says:

"well normally you have 11 players on the pitch and if one gets sent off you only have 10, I thought it was pretty clear"

Then when they ask about the number 12, he can reply:

"The ref was a bent cunt who was obviously angling for Burnley to get something from the game, so much so he may as well have worn a Burnley shirt with the number 12 on the back, what you think we didn't fucking notice you bent FA cunts?"

Original Dub wrote:Fucking ridiculous shit, the FA going after him on something that can be interpreted in many ways.

It's the equivalent of the media push to get mancini charged for waving an "imaginary card".

If it's imaginary, how the fuck do you know it's a card??

How can they prove what he meant? It's fucking stupid to even ask him.

Idiots on a fucking crusade.

If they were a proper organisation they'd be calling having a full review of the refereeing system in premier league and asking why it's getting worse instead of better.

You know, going after the problem, instead of those pointing the problem out.

Cunts.

That's brilliant.

Clearly a typo because if he was meaning the officiating of the game it would be 10 against 15.

Sky have just decided that Sagna was talking about Lee Mason, before the investigation has been concluded, or indeed the player himself has responded.

That's strange isn't it?

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... ason-to-fa

It was pretty stupid of him TBH. Emotive post and a good example of why players should not be anywhere near social.media on match days.

He has until 6pm on Friday to respond. We kick off at 7.45!
Will he get a ban? If so get the response in now so he is only banned for the cup game.

Original Dub wrote:Sky have just decided that Sagna was talking about Lee Mason, before the investigation has been concluded, or indeed the player himself has responded.

That's strange isn't it?

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... ason-to-fa

So they saw Mason's bias too?

I can only assume if they got there before Sagna clarified it.

Slim wrote:

Original Dub wrote:Sky have just decided that Sagna was talking about Lee Mason, before the investigation has been concluded, or indeed the player himself has responded.

That's strange isn't it?

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... ason-to-fa

So they saw Mason's bias too?

I can only assume if they got there before Sagna clarified it.

Ssn just now:

"And mike dean wasn't the only referee that managers were unhappy with... a very clearly upset jurgen klopp wasn't happy with the performance of anthony taylor..."

So they know klopp was agitated because of the referee but pep is just being weird and there's no explanation?

Again. Odd.

Anyway, this has to be thrown out because the media have already stated that sagna was talking about Lee Mason, thus soiling the investigation.

Slim wrote:

Original Dub wrote:Sky have just decided that Sagna was talking about Lee Mason, before the investigation has been concluded, or indeed the player himself has responded.

That's strange isn't it?

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... ason-to-fa

So they saw Mason's bias too?

I can only assume if they got there before Sagna clarified it.

Great point Slim

Just another ssn witch hunt

Sagna you legend. Just tell them to go fuck themselves.

Can't wait for peps next presser