Page 1 of 2
City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Wed Nov 16, 2016 10:43 pm
by Wonderwall
According to the daily mail. The new sponsorship deal that Barca have was offered to us first if we agreed to play in red. We said no..... or just plain old go fuck yourselves. Worth £50m a year too. Well done to the board.....now if it was Cardiff

Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Wed Nov 16, 2016 10:47 pm
by carolina-blue
Well done City
Could we have got away with 45 mill for pink
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:24 pm
by Moonchesteri
No fee is big enough to make us play in red. Well done City
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:50 am
by phips
Moonchesteri wrote:No fee is big enough to make us play in red. Well done City
hasn't our away kit been red many times?
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:45 am
by Tokyo Blue
phips wrote:Moonchesteri wrote:No fee is big enough to make us play in red. Well done City
hasn't our away kit been red many times?
No.
We have had black and red but mostly black, maroon, maroon and white, white with a red and black stripe, blue with a white and red stripe, but never, ever just red.
Whoever said sponsor is, and I am not clicking the link I'm afraid, can go and fuck themselves.
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:22 pm
by Beefymcfc
We'd have been offered a fraction of that sponsorship and even if it was 10 times as much I'd hope we'd tell them to ram it.
Disgusting to even ask us to wear that sort of shit, was obviously a Rag/Dipper trying to do the deal and trying to take the Piss while he was at it.
Could anybody honestly buy a red shirt, I don't even have anything red in my wardrobe.
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:18 pm
by CTID Hants
Beefymcfc wrote:We'd have been offered a fraction of that sponsorship and even if it was 10 times as much I'd hope we'd tell them to ram it.
Disgusting to even ask us to wear that sort of shit, was obviously a Rag/Dipper trying to do the deal and trying to take the Piss while he was at it.
Could anybody honestly buy a red shirt, I don't even have anything red in my wardrobe.
Absobloodylutely Beefy totally disgusting & deffo some plastic rag trying it on!
Talking of kits the club are struggling to sell the second kit currently, 3 months after launch and they are knocking them out with a 3rd off!
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 3:07 pm
by Hazy2
50 mill a season do Skins !
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 3:08 pm
by Wonderwall
CTID Hants wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:We'd have been offered a fraction of that sponsorship and even if it was 10 times as much I'd hope we'd tell them to ram it.
Disgusting to even ask us to wear that sort of shit, was obviously a Rag/Dipper trying to do the deal and trying to take the Piss while he was at it.
Could anybody honestly buy a red shirt, I don't even have anything red in my wardrobe.
Absobloodylutely Beefy totally disgusting & deffo some plastic rag trying it on!
Talking of kits the club are struggling to sell the second kit currently, 3 months after launch and they are knocking them out with a 3rd off!
Good the design is crap. They might knock Nike on the head sooner
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 3:22 pm
by s1ty m
Red makes women look cheap and men effeminate...so I've been told.
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 3:23 pm
by mr_nool
Wonderwall wrote:CTID Hants wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:We'd have been offered a fraction of that sponsorship and even if it was 10 times as much I'd hope we'd tell them to ram it.
Disgusting to even ask us to wear that sort of shit, was obviously a Rag/Dipper trying to do the deal and trying to take the Piss while he was at it.
Could anybody honestly buy a red shirt, I don't even have anything red in my wardrobe.
Absobloodylutely Beefy totally disgusting & deffo some plastic rag trying it on!
Talking of kits the club are struggling to sell the second kit currently, 3 months after launch and they are knocking them out with a 3rd off!
Good the design is crap. They might knock Nike on the head sooner
The away kit has actually grown on me and I like it more than the home kit. It's probably because I'm not as much of traditionalist when it comes to the away kit. Nike has fucked up the home kit too much with the dark blue sleeves and the sky-blue shorts.
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 3:39 pm
by South Stand Balti
Well done Blues. I wouldn't even wear red myself. No red clothes, no red cars, no red cups, no red jock straps......nothing.
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:20 pm
by CTID Hants
South Stand Balti wrote:Well done Blues. I wouldn't even wear red myself. No red clothes, no red cars, no red cups, no red jock straps......nothing.

Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:26 pm
by PeterParker
Who is that sponsor?
Also, I really dislike our kits since we are working with Nike. They are horrific, maybe the quality is good, but the aspects is terrible. They look like they are made in paint.
I was looking the other day at the kit Nottingham Forest have from Adidas. Amazing quality and superb aspect. I am really curious how much money we are getting from them.
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:37 pm
by CTID Hants
PeterParker wrote:Who is that sponsor?
Also, I really dislike our kits since we are working with Nike. They are horrific, maybe the quality is good, but the aspects is terrible. They look like they are made in paint.
I was looking the other day at the kit Nottingham Forest have from Adidas. Amazing quality and superb aspect. I am really curious how much money we are getting from them.
Japanese E-commerce company called Rakuten......
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38003752
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:58 pm
by PeterParker
CTID Hants wrote:PeterParker wrote:Who is that sponsor?
Also, I really dislike our kits since we are working with Nike. They are horrific, maybe the quality is good, but the aspects is terrible. They look like they are made in paint.
I was looking the other day at the kit Nottingham Forest have from Adidas. Amazing quality and superb aspect. I am really curious how much money we are getting from them.
Japanese E-commerce company called Rakuten......
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38003752
Cheers
Haha. I actually have some kitchen knives from them.
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 7:02 pm
by Justified logic
PeterParker wrote:Who is that sponsor?
Also, I really dislike our kits since we are working with Nike. They are horrific, maybe the quality is good, but the aspects is terrible. They look like they are made in paint.
Quality is shit. Shirts snag as soon as you look at them.
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 8:13 pm
by freshie
phips wrote:Moonchesteri wrote:No fee is big enough to make us play in red. Well done City
hasn't our away kit been red many times?
Yes - if you're colour blind
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 8:47 pm
by Mase
freshie wrote:phips wrote:Moonchesteri wrote:No fee is big enough to make us play in red. Well done City
hasn't our away kit been red many times?
Yes - if you're colour blind
What about if your just regularly blind?
Re: City were asked to play in RED urgh

Posted:
Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:11 pm
by JamieMCFC
PeterParker wrote:CTID Hants wrote:PeterParker wrote:Who is that sponsor?
Also, I really dislike our kits since we are working with Nike. They are horrific, maybe the quality is good, but the aspects is terrible. They look like they are made in paint.
I was looking the other day at the kit Nottingham Forest have from Adidas. Amazing quality and superb aspect. I am really curious how much money we are getting from them.
Japanese E-commerce company called Rakuten......
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38003752
Cheers
Haha. I actually have some kitchen knives from them.
It use to be a Buy.com it was rebranded Rakuten when they were purchased by a Japanese company. They operate out of California.