johnny crossan wrote:Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:johnny crossan wrote:Justified logic wrote:That is not an apology.
There were no misunderstandings. It was quite clear what his agent said - several times whilst Yaya remained silent.
Anyway, I thought Pep was demanding an apology from Seluk?
Seluk has just been on talksport and said he doesn't apologise; that he has nothing to apologise for.
Great times Yaya, but fuck off now.
Curious, but it is an apology for his misunderstandings I think,
"I wish to apologise - on behalf of myself and those who represent me,"
and also on behalf of his agent it would seem.
So the choreographed interview by his slug on TS, continuing to refuse to apologise, raises the question of whether Yaya can still be punished after doing all in this power to accede to Pep's requirements. Natural justice says he has done his part, albeit reluctantly and tardily, so he must now be back into consideration for selection.
Not in this case as Pep explicitly said he wanted an apology from his agent.
The main actor here is Yaya, he is the one with the contract and if he apologises for his employee's actions that constitutes a remedy. I think
Odd that he chooses now to apologise. Now that we've beaten Barca and really look like a team that could really go somewhere.
I would think he either makes Seluk apologise or sack him.
In fact sacking him would really cement Yaya's legendary status in my mind. It would be proof enough for me that he seriously wants to be part of this.
Anything else unfortunately proves nothing. I still see this as part of their game of what's best for Yaya &Co. rather than what's best for City.
Shit or get off the pot Yaya.
