Page 2 of 2

Re: Profits and revenues

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 6:47 pm
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
Yum, yum, motherfuckers.

Re: Profits and revenues

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 11:06 pm
by Bianchi on Ice
Nigels Tackle wrote:standard dig at the end of that article
they just can't help themselves
cunts


Yes..I noticed that. You can just imagine.."City are currently 17 points clear at the top but have only won their last two matches 1-0"

Re: Profits and revenues

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:38 am
by Beefymcfc
Bianchi on Ice wrote:
Nigels Tackle wrote:standard dig at the end of that article
they just can't help themselves
cunts


Yes..I noticed that. You can just imagine.."City are currently 17 points clear at the top but have only won their last two matches 1-0"

Although City move into the CL final with a bruising win over Barca, for the third time this season, they will be bitterly disappointed with the attendance which was one short of capacity. See the picture below, circled in red for evidence of their poor fan culture.

Re: Profits and revenues

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:05 am
by Moonchesteri
nottsblue wrote:
mr_nool wrote:
nottsblue wrote:Also, in light of Chelsea's recent fifteen year, £900m deal with their shirt supplier, we should be looking at reviewing our current deal


I'd rather that we didn't make a new deal with Nike. We haven't had one good kit since they took over.

I'd be happy with crappy kits if it meant an extra £30m a year


I'm not sure extra £30mil is enough

Re: Profits and revenues

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 8:42 am
by Foreverinbluedreams

Re: Profits and revenues

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 9:34 am
by john@staustell
Comprehensive as always. A decent read.

Re: Profits and revenues

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:06 am
by Mikhail Chigorin
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:The Swiss Rambles' take:

http://swissramble.blogspot.ie/2016/10/ ... e.html?m=1


Phew, that's some read.

Absolutely fascinating with much to digest.

Thanks for posting it FIBD.

Re: Profits and revenues

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:08 am
by Dameerto
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:The Swiss Rambles' take:

http://swissramble.blogspot.ie/2016/10/ ... e.html?m=1


"This form of domestic FFP restricts annual player wage cost increases to £7 million a year for the three years up to 2018/19 – except if funded by increases in revenue from sources other than Premier League broadcasting contracts. In other words, future wage growth could be funded by higher commercial income, so maybe City are keeping their powder dry here."


I think there's some truth here personally - I can see us having a new kit deal and new main sponsor deal at some point in the future.