Cocacolajojo wrote:I Just Blue Myself wrote:That is exactly what I said. Well done.
Probably not, but Hart would not have been content sitting on the bench bar the odd Cup game. Bigger picture and all that.
Willy is wonky, but he is toeing the party line and don't forget his involvement in this:
Only scenario where that point is relevant is where that magnificent sidepass, that we mere mortals can only dream of making, is relevant is a scenario in which Hart didn't contribute to the build up of goals, as the post that you replied to was comparing Hart and Willy.
You're welcome.
There is another scenario where I have tried to answer someone's question, explicitly not comparing Hart's and Willy's capabilities as footballers, but instead offered what I believe to be the main reason for their respective situations, which you can call 'politics', if you want.
I have also, for the sake of balance, tried to make someone who barely watched the match and described Willy's distribution as shit, aware of the positive aspects of Willy's performance, i.e. finding a team mate three times to draw out the opposing press, leading to a goal.
There is also a scenario where you are being a turd and misinterpreting my post. I don't really care about either Willy or Hart, both should be gone next summer.
In fact, I am as critical as anyone about Willy. His distribution is shoddy (which I acknowledged in my original post, but at least he tries) and he is the opposite of a calming influence on our back line. The latter point is a major argument for experienced keepers over someone like Gunn, but since Willy is lacking in that regard, I am questioning whether he should be preferred over the youngster.
All that said, if you believe that Hart would do the same job in the same circumstances (sitting idly on the bench, just to feature in the League Cup), you must be on some strong hippie crack.