Page 4 of 13

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:34 pm
by iwasthere2012
Ok Dimples......
Basically he's saying, with all due respect, you're wrong and if you want him to expand on that he's more than willing to.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:34 pm
by Swales4ever
bigblue wrote:
Swales4ever wrote:those guys have to - somehow - justify the chair they seat and, apart for delivering Pep with 3 years delay plus KdB (and would add even Sir Dinho for very good measure) they have done nothing but purchasing third options at overly inflated fees.
which, in turns, continue to make a fool of THE CHAIRMAN's business reputation.

as many advised posters have noted in both preseason match threads, what shown by Tosin, Maffeo and Angelino, and I'd add by today Denayer's performance, granted the manager's reputation at nurturing freshmen, raise huge question marks on the need to waste a factory of money on yet another prospect who is gonna add nothing of note to the potential of a top club aiming to the very top.
MCFC are CL semifinalist, among the richest of riches, already filled with some world class players and now managed by the very best: who the hell wont will to join??? still...


You're descending into lunacy again.

I'm loving our transfers so far this year. Get the best 19-23 year olds and sprinkle in 1 or 2 veterans who fit our system perfectly. Plus snatch up Brasil's best young talent low key under the radar. Gabriel Jesus looks out of this world for a 19 year old. On Neymar's level, no exaggeration.

So sit back and crack open a beer (or light your Italian crack pipe) and get ready to enjoy the next few years.


You know, Big, much on the contrary to "iwasthere2012" [although Im everyday more convinced he's someone backup taking the piss on me] You are a bright mind who had my respect when we often found in agreement, as well as has now, when You seems constantly aiming to throw s***e at me. Think it's mostly down to offseason boredoom.

But, tell me, why should be arsed to take seriously the above assumption of lunacy.
anyhow, if interested, You can have your fair share of headache with my last 2 posts above.
time for bed now.

p.s.: I'm oldstylish so, apart for some doobies at the proper age, I can only range from beer to malts,
But I wont need it to enjoy the next few years, so please, please, dont turn into the next version of reptile Ted from the ending of the Mancini era.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:42 pm
by iwasthere2012
.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 12:01 am
by iwasthere2012
Swales4ever wrote:
bigblue wrote:
Swales4ever wrote:those guys have to - somehow - justify the chair they seat and, apart for delivering Pep with 3 years delay plus KdB (and would add even Sir Dinho for very good measure) they have done nothing but purchasing third options at overly inflated fees.
which, in turns, continue to make a fool of THE CHAIRMAN's business reputation.

as many advised posters have noted in both preseason match threads, what shown by Tosin, Maffeo and Angelino, and I'd add by today Denayer's performance, granted the manager's reputation at nurturing freshmen, raise huge question marks on the need to waste a factory of money on yet another prospect who is gonna add nothing of note to the potential of a top club aiming to the very top.
MCFC are CL semifinalist, among the richest of riches, already filled with some world class players and now managed by the very best: who the hell wont will to join??? still...


You're descending into lunacy again.

I'm loving our transfers so far this year. Get the best 19-23 year olds and sprinkle in 1 or 2 veterans who fit our system perfectly. Plus snatch up Brasil's best young talent low key under the radar. Gabriel Jesus looks out of this world for a 19 year old. On Neymar's level, no exaggeration.

So sit back and crack open a beer (or light your Italian crack pipe) and get ready to enjoy the next few years.


You know, Big, much on the contrary to "iwasthere2012" [although Im everyday more convinced he's someone backup taking the piss on me] You are a bright mind who had my respect when we often found in agreement, as well as has now, when You seems constantly aiming to throw s***e at me. Think it's mostly down to offseason boredoom.

But, tell me, why should be arsed to take seriously the above assumption of lunacy.
anyhow, if interested, You can have your fair share of headache with my last 2 posts above.
time for bed now.

p.s.: I'm oldstylish so, apart for some doobies at the proper age, I can only range from beer to malts,
But I wont need it to enjoy the next few years, so please, please, dont turn into the next version of reptile Ted from the ending of the Mancini era.


Swalesie . I can assure you, I'm not the reincarnation of any previous poster.
I'm only on here a little less than two years, so I have no idea of any history you have with anyone else on here from years ago.
Personally I love your posts, but they are quite long and can be a tad difficult to follow at times.
If I misrepresented the gist of your posts, feel free to put me straight.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 12:16 am
by blues2win
City supposedly saying to Everton we won't be held to ransom. There was a picture of Stones looking absolutely miserable as he went off on Everton's German tour.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 12:20 am
by bigblue
Swales4ever wrote:
bigblue wrote:
Swales4ever wrote:those guys have to - somehow - justify the chair they seat and, apart for delivering Pep with 3 years delay plus KdB (and would add even Sir Dinho for very good measure) they have done nothing but purchasing third options at overly inflated fees.
which, in turns, continue to make a fool of THE CHAIRMAN's business reputation.

as many advised posters have noted in both preseason match threads, what shown by Tosin, Maffeo and Angelino, and I'd add by today Denayer's performance, granted the manager's reputation at nurturing freshmen, raise huge question marks on the need to waste a factory of money on yet another prospect who is gonna add nothing of note to the potential of a top club aiming to the very top.
MCFC are CL semifinalist, among the richest of riches, already filled with some world class players and now managed by the very best: who the hell wont will to join??? still...


You're descending into lunacy again.

I'm loving our transfers so far this year. Get the best 19-23 year olds and sprinkle in 1 or 2 veterans who fit our system perfectly. Plus snatch up Brasil's best young talent low key under the radar. Gabriel Jesus looks out of this world for a 19 year old. On Neymar's level, no exaggeration.

So sit back and crack open a beer (or light your Italian crack pipe) and get ready to enjoy the next few years.


You know, Big, much on the contrary to "iwasthere2012" [although Im everyday more convinced he's someone backup taking the piss on me] You are a bright mind who had my respect when we often found in agreement, as well as has now, when You seems constantly aiming to throw s***e at me. Think it's mostly down to offseason boredoom.

But, tell me, why should be arsed to take seriously the above assumption of lunacy.
anyhow, if interested, You can have your fair share of headache with my last 2 posts above.
time for bed now.

p.s.: I'm oldstylish so, apart for some doobies at the proper age, I can only range from beer to malts,
But I wont need it to enjoy the next few years, so please, please, dont turn into the next version of reptile Ted from the ending of the Mancini era.


I'm all for doozies, reefers and wherever else the kids call the. It's also legal to grow the Jazz cabbage where I live.

You're an enigma and things I don't understand I have a tendency to think are crazy. Have a nice sleep

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 6:34 am
by Wooders
oh fuck off mancio - stop invading threads and making them about you

anyway

apparently we've made a final offer of 40 million for Stones and they can take it or leave it. a more sensible offer for me, still over the odds, but that is the market

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 7:50 am
by ruralblue
I think we need to know more about Bigblues Kazz Cabbage! (In all my years I've never heard it referred to as this and I've smoked a lot if Jazz Cabbage!)

Also where are you and when can I move over?

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:21 am
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
blues2win wrote:City supposedly saying to Everton we won't be held to ransom. There was a picture of Stones looking absolutely miserable as he went off on Everton's German tour.

Perhaps he doesn't like Germans.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 2:55 pm
by bigblue
ruralblue wrote:I think we need to know more about Bigblues Kazz Cabbage! (In all my years I've never heard it referred to as this and I've smoked a lot if Jazz Cabbage!)

Also where are you and when can I move over?


Washington, DC the nations Capitol! Legal to grow 6 at a time.

But 40 mil for stones sounds lovely. Think it'll end up around 45, but it doesn't really matter does it. Not my money and what's 5 or 10 million in the bigger picture

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:31 am
by Hazy2
Williams to Swansea 10 mill...... Good buy, excellent player. Does this allow Stones to leave?

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:37 am
by Mase
Hazy2 wrote:Williams to Swansea 10 mill...... Good buy, excellent player. Does this allow Stones to leave?


£10 million is very good for Williams. We paid £42 mill for Mongo!

Surely that means they're getting a replacement in for Stones. Hopefully we haven't been held to ransom like was being suggested.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:56 am
by Wooders
i don't know why but i am a lot more comfortable with 40 million

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 12:53 pm
by Hazy2
Mase wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:Williams to Swansea 10 mill...... Good buy, excellent player. Does this allow Stones to leave?


£10 million is very good for Williams. We paid £42 mill for Mongo!

Surely that means they're getting a replacement in for Stones. Hopefully we haven't been held to ransom like was being suggested.


I would have both.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 1:11 pm
by Mase
Hazy2 wrote:
Mase wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:Williams to Swansea 10 mill...... Good buy, excellent player. Does this allow Stones to leave?


£10 million is very good for Williams. We paid £42 mill for Mongo!

Surely that means they're getting a replacement in for Stones. Hopefully we haven't been held to ransom like was being suggested.


I would have both.


Is Williams in is last year or something? I don't understand why Swansea would sell him for so cheap yet we paid how much for Bony?!

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 1:17 pm
by Slim
Mase wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:
Mase wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:Williams to Swansea 10 mill...... Good buy, excellent player. Does this allow Stones to leave?


£10 million is very good for Williams. We paid £42 mill for Mongo!

Surely that means they're getting a replacement in for Stones. Hopefully we haven't been held to ransom like was being suggested.


I would have both.


Is Williams in is last year or something? I don't understand why Swansea would sell him for so cheap yet we paid how much for Bony?!


Two years.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:59 pm
by Mase
Slim wrote:
Mase wrote:Is Williams in is last year or something? I don't understand why Swansea would sell him for so cheap yet we paid how much for Bony?!


Two years.


We don't half get a dry bumming when negotiating for these players!

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 3:35 pm
by Hazy2
Mase wrote:
Slim wrote:
Mase wrote:Is Williams in is last year or something? I don't understand why Swansea would sell him for so cheap yet we paid how much for Bony?!


Two years.


We don't half get a dry bumming when negotiating for these players!


Not seen a better centre half than williams, plus He would love a go at Zlatan, like he did with RVP. 10 mill Is nothing for him. He is proven, and better than anything we have.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 3:43 pm
by Foreverinbluedreams
£10m for a 32 year old centre back isn't all that great. We paid half that for Demichelis at the same age.

Re: stones - talks opened

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:24 pm
by Hazy2
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:£10m for a 32 year old centre back isn't all that great. We paid half that for Demichelis at the same age.


Demi was ok for 5 mill, in today's market AW is great value for 2 good seasons back up for a third, IMHO