The mancityfans.net football forum

He is allegedly up for a rape case and has been accused of being the second person in a rape. The telegraph are reporting he has been sent home. But guillem balague says he is still at the team hotel. Would love him to get sent down if true. Rags miss out on huge transfer fee and a good keeper.

is it wrong to find this hilarious?

Would love to see him get sent down!

rag caught doing raggy things

not a surprise

Wonderwall wrote:He is allegedly up for a rape case and has been accused of being the second person in a rape. The telegraph are reporting he has been sent home. But guillem balague says he is still at the team hotel. Would love him to get sent down if true. Rags miss out on huge transfer fee and a good keeper.

He hasn't been accused of rape though, has he and your post, as well as the title is as slanderous as it gets and I think you should be careful.

De Gea has been implicated for arranging a meeting between two prostitutes and two footballers, Muniain and one unnamed, who allegededly sexually assaulted and threatened the women. The pimp who was in contact with De Gea is apparently in court for child pornography, human trafficking, abuse and other vile practices.

While this, if true, is sickening behaviour by the involved parties, we should try not to label someone a rapist just because he plays for Manchester United.

Of course, if this turns out to be true, throw the book at the lot of them.

Nigels Tackle wrote:is it wrong to find this hilarious?

The glee in some comments is a bit disconcerting tbh.

Personally, I'll wait for the t-shirts before I laugh about and point the finger at Utd.

With that name he should get any job in the circus.

Introducing, the amazing David the Rapist.

I Just Blue Myself wrote:

Wonderwall wrote:He is allegedly up for a rape case and has been accused of being the second person in a rape. The telegraph are reporting he has been sent home. But guillem balague says he is still at the team hotel. Would love him to get sent down if true. Rags miss out on huge transfer fee and a good keeper.

He hasn't been accused of rape though, has he and your post, as well as the title is as slanderous as it gets and I think you should be careful.

De Gea has been implicated for arranging a meeting between two prostitutes and two footballers, Muniain and one unnamed, who allegededly sexually assaulted and threatened the women. The pimp who was in contact with De Gea is apparently in court for child pornography, human trafficking, abuse and other vile practices.

While this, if true, is sickening behaviour by the involved parties, we should try not to label someone a rapist just because he plays for Manchester United.

Of course, if this turns out to be true, throw the book at the lot of them.

You're judged by the company you keep.

He hasn't been accused of rape - so far. Just for complicity in pimping

Lev Bronstein wrote:He hasn't been accused of rape - so far. Just for complicity in pimping

David De complicity in pimping doesn't trip off the tongue

Wonderwall wrote:

Lev Bronstein wrote:He hasn't been accused of rape - so far. Just for complicity in pimping

David De complicity in pimping doesn't trip off the tongue

Probably not the right form of words to use on the subject

Wonderwall wrote:

Lev Bronstein wrote:He hasn't been accused of rape - so far. Just for complicity in pimping

David De complicity in pimping doesn't trip off the tongue

If it was one of ours, I'd be cynical of any reports in such papers as I've seen it in so far. I'll afford him the same presumption of innocence until proven otherwise.


However ...... I'm sure there's a lot you could do with the tag, David dePimp

Whatever the allegations are, if it puts him off his game and takes his focus away, then thats fine with me

Anyone read into the whole thing?

Isco”s name appears there alongside Munain.

Looks like not too much to do with the Donut Thief but what is disconcerting is that 2 known prostitutes, paid for services, are complaining if rape.

If the 2 did do that then they want shoeing but, how can you rape someone who you're paying for the service?

Ps. Good to be back, you cunts!

Nigels Tackle wrote:is it wrong to find this hilarious?

Very.

You're going to hell.

Think I'll see you there, because I PMSL.

Beefymcfc wrote:Looks like not too much to do with the Donut Thief but what is disconcerting is that 2 known prostitutes, paid for services, are complaining if rape.

If the 2 did do that then they want shoeing but, how can you rape someone who you're paying for the service?

Ps. Good to be back, you cunts!

Of course prostitutes can be raped. Punter pays for a certain service, then wants more, prostitute does not want to engage, punter does so anyway against will of prostitute = rape

Fidel Castro wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:Looks like not too much to do with the Donut Thief but what is disconcerting is that 2 known prostitutes, paid for services, are complaining if rape.

If the 2 did do that then they want shoeing but, how can you rape someone who you're paying for the service?

Ps. Good to be back, you cunts!

Of course prostitutes can be raped. Punter pays for a certain service, then wants more, prostitute does not want to engage, punter does so anyway against will of prostitute = rape

I wasn't meaning that mate, more the fact that rich footballers who have paid for the service would then not pay, as in the question mark?

Beefy, I hope you're not being serious?

I Just Blue Myself wrote:Beefy, I hope you're not being serious?

Why not? Not sure if I put it across right but I do wonder if they found how who they were and are now playing it to get money.

As mentioned in my first post, if theyve done wrong then they need a shoeing. Or is this people looking for something to have a go at?