Page 2 of 2

Re: After Match: City v West Brom

PostPosted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 1:06 am
by phips
ruralblue wrote:
phips wrote:not sure why people are upset with the lineup and the match.

its literally exactly what i expected given the fixture list, injury list, and opponent.
the lineup was always going to be what it was. it was hold on for 60ish (or take a lead) and then try and win it with the quality subs who were given a rest due to recently coming back from injury.
thats all it was going to be.

good match. awful to watch but good match.


Couldn't post a more contradictory post really. Good match yet awful to watch???

As for the line up? Bony over Ian? Ah yes cause Bony has proved himself so much so far this season.

i see you missed my multiple posts in the match thread. no worries mate.

as for the apparent contradiction i'll help you: it was awful to watch but a good match.

Re: After Match: City v West Brom

PostPosted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:46 pm
by Herb
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Joe Hart's impression of an aubergine gets more impressive with each passing week.


The Joe the clown fan club are working on a big banner that they think will help him perform . . it reads 'wakey wakey''.

Re: After Match: City v West Brom

PostPosted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:07 pm
by freshie
Herb wrote:
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Joe Hart's impression of an aubergine gets more impressive with each passing week.


The Joe the clown fan club are working on a big banner that they think will help him perform . . it reads 'wakey wakey''.


Surprise, surprise you're back out from the stone you've been hiding under for the last 6 months. Get bent you tosser