Wonderwall wrote:MDM Confirmed as in the squad for tomorrow by pellers FFS
Hazy2 wrote:Wonderwall wrote:MDM Confirmed as in the squad for tomorrow by pellers FFS
Stupidity from the caretaker, another example he knows he can say and do whatever he wants as we are not gonna fire his arse.
Socrates wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Wonderwall wrote:MDM Confirmed as in the squad for tomorrow by pellers FFS
Stupidity from the caretaker, another example he knows he can say and do whatever he wants as we are not gonna fire his arse.
Erm, they already fired him, did you miss it?
Hazy2 wrote:Socrates wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Wonderwall wrote:MDM Confirmed as in the squad for tomorrow by pellers FFS
Stupidity from the caretaker, another example he knows he can say and do whatever he wants as we are not gonna fire his arse.
Erm, they already fired him, did you miss it?
Fired when did that happen, he is lingering like you. Hardly marched out of his office is it.
Hazy2 wrote:Socrates wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Wonderwall wrote:MDM Confirmed as in the squad for tomorrow by pellers FFS
Stupidity from the caretaker, another example he knows he can say and do whatever he wants as we are not gonna fire his arse.
Erm, they already fired him, did you miss it?
Fired when did that happen, he is lingering like you. Hardly marched out of his office is it.
Wonderwall wrote:MDM Confirmed as in the squad for tomorrow by pellers FFS
Socrates wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Socrates wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Wonderwall wrote:MDM Confirmed as in the squad for tomorrow by pellers FFS
Stupidity from the caretaker, another example he knows he can say and do whatever he wants as we are not gonna fire his arse.
Erm, they already fired him, did you miss it?
Fired when did that happen, he is lingering like you. Hardly marched out of his office is it.
Being given notice of the early termination of your contract is most definitely "fired." I used to give you the benefit of the doubt in spite of your limited ability when expressing yourself in a written form but I am now coming to the conclusion that you really are in the imbecile brigade.
Saul Goodman wrote:Wonderwall wrote:MDM Confirmed as in the squad for tomorrow by pellers FFS
Am i missing something? Why is this an issue?
Seems to be the same as appealing a ban and playing during the appeal or appealing a transfer ban and signing players while the appeal is ongoing
Wonderwall wrote:Saul Goodman wrote:Wonderwall wrote:MDM Confirmed as in the squad for tomorrow by pellers FFS
Am i missing something? Why is this an issue?
Seems to be the same as appealing a ban and playing during the appeal or appealing a transfer ban and signing players while the appeal is ongoing
It's an issue because he is shite
blues2win wrote:Reported that de Michelis not to contest the charges of illegal betting. I presume he'll make a plea in mitigation
blues2win wrote:Reported that de Michelis not to contest the charges of illegal betting. I presume he'll make a plea in mitigation
Socrates wrote:Blackadder wrote:Rumours are it is concerning bets placed on games back in South America, nothing to do with the Prem or City.
If that was the case then it would have to be International competition involving Argentina or an "inside information" thing with club football as he is allowed to bet on competitions he is not part of but is subject to rules on insider information from his "position in football."
Beefymcfc wrote:Players no longer able to bet on games, even if they're half a world away? Seems a little hypocritical when the likes of Sky, who fund the game, have their own betting subsidiary.
Im_Spartacus wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Players no longer able to bet on games, even if they're half a world away? Seems a little hypocritical when the likes of Sky, who fund the game, have their own betting subsidiary.
Very valid point. Who is more likely to have the means and access to engage in systemic corruption of a league?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: belleebee, BlueinBosnia, CTID Hants, ian494, Outcast, stupot, zuricity and 42 guests