The mancityfans.net football forum

Although disappointed, thought there were quite a few who put a decent shift in tonight. I thought Navas wanted it while Demi, who was gash at weekend, was very much assured. Clichy looked good for his first appearance for a while and Fernandinho really got stuck in, only letting himself down with the wild swipe.

But you're not bitter :).

Can we vote for "noone in Manchester City"?

Jim Whitley

Left it to my 9 year old son to pick as I cant bring myself to do it, so he says Aguero for the goal although even he admitted no one deserved it

Cocacolajojo wrote:But you're not bitter :).

Can we vote for "noone in Manchester City"?

I'm fucking livid. My input is no longer needed.

Bye folks!

Gone for Aguero..... No chances and 1 goal.

Aguero.

Fernandinho, mainly as I couldn't pick anyone who'd been involved in the first half shambles

Delph. The only.one who looked like he wanted us to get back into it.

Wonderwall wrote:Delph. The only.one who looked like he wanted us to get back into it.

I honestly think Delph can become a real class player.

No one in this debacle was going to be MotM for being excellent, just for trying and doing a couple of good things, so I'm going for Joe for his saves despite his struggles to distribute the ball. Good goal by Sergio, but not enough for MotM. Kolarov saw a lot of the ball but wasted most of it. Delph was a breath of fresh air but not on long enough.

A really encouraging effort from Delph. I liked what i saw.

Hart I suppose for it not being 1-6.
Other that, well let's just move on.

I went for Aguero on the basis that he's usually useless in his first 3 or 4 games back after a layoff and he looked sharpish at times yesterday.
Joe Hart motm? How anyone could vote for that clown is beyond me - I doubt that any keeper in the PL had worse distribution than he did yesterday . . it was so bad that it was embarrassing and it stopped us from breaking and nullified our counter-attacking threat.
He did his shutting they eyes and making like a starfish thing with some success but he didn't save many that were put his way - he had more to deal with than he usually gets but that was reflected in him letting 4 in and his saves to shots ratio is always crap.

Would've been even more embarrassing were it not for Hart's saves so he gets my vote.

Can't understand why anyone would vote for Aguero, granted he scored a cracking goal but he contributed little else.

Herb you're one boring cunt.

Went for delph ,,but a bad day all-round work in the morning will be shite

hart all day long
if they all played as consistently well as does, we'd be out of sight at the top of the league

Herb wrote:I went for Aguero on the basis that he's usually useless in his first 3 or 4 games back after a layoff and he looked sharpish at times yesterday.
Joe Hart motm? How anyone could vote for that clown is beyond me - I doubt that any keeper in the PL had worse distribution than he did yesterday . . it was so bad that it was embarrassing and it stopped us from breaking and nullified our counter-attacking threat.
He did his shutting they eyes and making like a starfish thing with some success but he didn't save many that were put his way - he had more to deal with than he usually gets but that was reflected in him letting 4 in and his saves to shots ratio is always crap.

I voted for Joe too. As others have said without his saves could easily have been 6 or 7

You're a fool. Notice how you've been silent about Joe this season as his performances have been excellent. We concede 4 goals at home, none of which were his fault, and you're on his back again. Pathetic

freshie wrote:

Herb wrote:I went for Aguero on the basis that he's usually useless in his first 3 or 4 games back after a layoff and he looked sharpish at times yesterday.
Joe Hart motm? How anyone could vote for that clown is beyond me - I doubt that any keeper in the PL had worse distribution than he did yesterday . . it was so bad that it was embarrassing and it stopped us from breaking and nullified our counter-attacking threat.
He did his shutting they eyes and making like a starfish thing with some success but he didn't save many that were put his way - he had more to deal with than he usually gets but that was reflected in him letting 4 in and his saves to shots ratio is always crap.

I voted for Joe too. As others have said without his saves could easily have been 6 or 7

You're a fool. Notice how you've been silent about Joe this season as his performances have been excellent. We concede 4 goals at home, none of which were his fault, and you're on his back again. Pathetic

I actually think the criticism of Joe's distribution is once again valid, part of our game plan seemed to be Sagna winning headers from goal kicks/long punts on the wing, Trevor Sinclair style.

However, this in no way diminishes his huge saves to stop this being much more of a humiliation and he gets my vote.