The mancityfans.net football forum

Wiggy wants to be rags or Everton boss within ten years.

And he said it with a straight face.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68431354

Ten Bob wants an apology from Fulham after calling out Fernandes on their official tiktok for blatant attempt to cheat


https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeDKyDBS/


'Fulham should apologise for Fernandes TikTok' - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68439010

CTID Hants wrote:Ten Bob wants an apology from Fulham after calling out Fernandes on their official tiktok for blatant attempt to cheat


https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeDKyDBS/


'Fulham should apologise for Fernandes TikTok' - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68439010

He should get a retrospective 3 match ban for cheating

But it says a lot about the media that they aren’t all over this

nottsblue wrote:

CTID Hants wrote:Ten Bob wants an apology from Fulham after calling out Fernandes on their official tiktok for blatant attempt to cheat


https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeDKyDBS/


'Fulham should apologise for Fernandes TikTok' - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68439010

He should get a retrospective 3 match ban for cheating

But it says a lot about the media that they aren’t all over this

ETH, easily the thickest manager on the planet. I’d not seen it until he mentioned it, now he’s pushing it even more fuckin idiot

nottsblue wrote:

CTID Hants wrote:Ten Bob wants an apology from Fulham after calling out Fernandes on their official tiktok for blatant attempt to cheat


https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeDKyDBS/


'Fulham should apologise for Fernandes TikTok' - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68439010

He should get a retrospective 3 match ban for cheating

But it says a lot about the media that they aren’t all over this

Ten bob, by even mentioning an apology, is showin his true colours and why he's the rags manager, he should be publically scorning his Captain for shithousery play acting!!!

I wish more clubs would put things like this on their socials, calling out cheats, embarrass the fuck of them and i would include our own players in that. It's one of the part of the modern game I hate.

Another thing that annoys me is when commentators say :he's won them a penalty" like it's something to celebrate and encourges cheating! I hate it when players celebrate the award by high fiving, yes be pleased once you've scored and have the goal, but not the award.

Radcliffe has said the Rags might take Greenwood back. When they do I hope he gets dogs abuse at every ground he goes to.

Mase wrote:Radcliffe has said the Rags might take Greenwood back. When they do I hope he gets dogs abuse at every ground he goes to.

Not a chance that he goes back their girls team wouldn't allow it and we can't go upsetting them in these times can we? Mind, it would cause even more disruption so it's a yes from me. Crack on Jimbo at this rate, you will soon knock us off that perch ahead of your 3 year schedule

salford city wrote:

Mase wrote:Radcliffe has said the Rags might take Greenwood back. When they do I hope he gets dogs abuse at every ground he goes to.

Not a chance that he goes back their girls team wouldn't allow it and we can't go upsetting them in these times can we? Mind, it would cause even more disruption so it's a yes from me. Crack on Jimbo at this rate, you will soon knock us off that perch ahead of your 3 year schedule

I do wonder why Jim is acting like he owns the club and the Glazers are letting him.

Mase wrote:

salford city wrote:

Mase wrote:Radcliffe has said the Rags might take Greenwood back. When they do I hope he gets dogs abuse at every ground he goes to.

Not a chance that he goes back their girls team wouldn't allow it and we can't go upsetting them in these times can we? Mind, it would cause even more disruption so it's a yes from me. Crack on Jimbo at this rate, you will soon knock us off that perch ahead of your 3 year schedule

I do wonder why Jim is acting like he owns the club and the Glazers are letting him.

The Glazers aren’t thick

They still take the money but now have a fall guy for when things go tits up. As Jimmy has control of the football side all blame can be laid at his door

nottsblue wrote:

Mase wrote:

salford city wrote:

Mase wrote:Radcliffe has said the Rags might take Greenwood back. When they do I hope he gets dogs abuse at every ground he goes to.

Not a chance that he goes back their girls team wouldn't allow it and we can't go upsetting them in these times can we? Mind, it would cause even more disruption so it's a yes from me. Crack on Jimbo at this rate, you will soon knock us off that perch ahead of your 3 year schedule

I do wonder why Jim is acting like he owns the club and the Glazers are letting him.

The Glazers aren’t thick

They still take the money but now have a fall guy for when things go tits up. As Jimmy has control of the football side all blame can be laid at his door

True. Also has decent ties with the Gov I suppose. Read INEOS have been given £600m

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/feb/29/uk-600m-backing-jim-ratcliffe-carbon-bomb-petrochemical-plant

£600m to a Billionaire Paedos looking after Paedos

Ferguson famously said in 2009 that City would never be top dogs in his lifetime but they have dominated football since he retired. "You have to see that comment in the context it was made. He couldn’t envision the people coming in with the money and that backing," Meulensteen added.

Deserves to go in here - Palmer says Poch has made him a better player

Mase wrote:Deserves to go in here - Palmer says Poch has made him a better player

Read that myself earlier and had a little giggle. Righto mate

salford city wrote:

Mase wrote:Deserves to go in here - Palmer says Poch has made him a better player

Read that myself earlier and had a little giggle. Righto mate

Probably meant card player. The scrote

Original Dub wrote:Ferguson famously said in 2009 that City would never be top dogs in his lifetime but they have dominated football since he retired. "You have to see that comment in the context it was made. He couldn’t envision the people coming in with the money and that backing," Meulensteen added.

I thought he was asked the question AFTER our takeover?

john@staustell wrote:

Original Dub wrote:Ferguson famously said in 2009 that City would never be top dogs in his lifetime but they have dominated football since he retired. "You have to see that comment in the context it was made. He couldn’t envision the people coming in with the money and that backing," Meulensteen added.

I thought he was asked the question AFTER our takeover?

correct, a year after - the Sheikh bought us in 2008.

john@staustell wrote:

Original Dub wrote:Ferguson famously said in 2009 that City would never be top dogs in his lifetime but they have dominated football since he retired. "You have to see that comment in the context it was made. He couldn’t envision the people coming in with the money and that backing," Meulensteen added.

I thought he was asked the question AFTER our takeover?

It was the season we’d signed Tevez, after we’d been taken over.

The actually question from the journo was - “Will United ever go into a derby as underdogs?”

And Fergie, while he was walking out of the press conference said, “not in my lifetime”.

Exactly.

Isn't it funny how history can be made up. Just like the daily newspapers.

Case proved then. Meulenstein, however you write it, another Rag talking utter shite

Ferguson also said in the same press conference that City aren’t United’s “derby”. It’s Liverpool.

1. Liverpool and Manchester are two different cities, it can’t be a derby
2. If Liverpool were their rivals, why not have a banner from the Stretford End counting down the years since they won the league? Instead of for us?

Our rivals now are Bayern and Real. United’s are Brighton and Newcastle.