Ted Hughes wrote:Nobody knows how good Barker will become. He has the talent to be a real top of the tree player, but it's not easy to know at this stage, whether that will happen, just as it would have been laughable to suggest Gareth Bale, at the same age, would end up at Real Madrid. If you compare the two at the same age, then you'd say Barker has a bigger chance, but that doesn't mean you'd be right.
What is certain, is that Barker has the potential to be an 'A' list player, as do several others, & some twat coming on sneering at people, saying that only Lopes has the potential to be a top player, is just that: a twat.
With respect to the terminology generally used on this forum, I'll back this opinion and add that 'game changer' bale has been so gamechangingly fantabulous in Madrid that the fans there wish he'd fuck off . . . or, in other words, that the fans who watch him close-up week in and week out in a league less demanding that the PL don't feel that he was worth the silly money paid for him . . . Having already suffered the agonies of a good slap from the FFP restrictions this season, I for one wouldn't want us to fork out anything more that £45m for bale as he's good but certainly not £80m good.
In short; as Madrid won't take a bid in the balls for him I don't want him bought because IMO he wasn't and still isn't worth anything near what they paid for him.
If we pay top dollar for any player then I say bring in a top keeper to give our defence some confidence!
If we had De Gea and the rags had Hart, we'd be top with a 9 point lead and they'd be in 12th place - that's the difference between a 'good' keeper and a 'top class' keeper - 12 places - think about it.