Im_Spartacus wrote:Mase wrote:Im_Spartacus wrote:Mase wrote:"physical violence towards Balotelli"
Bloody ell mate he dragged him by his top. Hardly call it physical violence for crying out loud. As a manager he shouldn't do it. Probably as much as Sir Alice shouldn't have kicked/thrown a boot at Beckham. It happens.
And if that happened in your workplace?
Like I said, it wasn't the only incident, it was just the only one reported
Ahh the old "if that happened in your workplace" argument. The fact is football is completely different and separate from any normal work place in the world! It's been proven time and time again. If I failed a drugs test where I worked I would get fired. I wouldn't just get a couple of months ban from work.
If it came out at work that I'd had a threesome with a couple of hookers in my own private time I'm sure no one would be bothered. But if I football does it its all over the papers.
You can't compare 'normal' jobs to football.
But just like the pattern of behaviour of players who appear to be downing tools under successive managers, Mancini displayed a pattern of behaviour towards everyone at the club which was frankly weird.
He got away with it for as long as he brought success (hence I agree to an extent with your argument about football being different), but the minute his methods stopped bringing success, his political capital in the eyes of the Spafia was practically zero and that pattern of behaviour could no longer be tolerated.
This is why I hope it's different with Pellegrini, and that the club support him over the players this time round. He's not (as far as we know) alienated everyone in the club with weird and aggressive behaviour, but by all accounts is a decent guy who has shown he knows how to win. They don't have the excuse that they had with Mancini, and that alone should raise enough questions with the Spafia about the role of the players in our current predicament.
I agree that it was the right time for Mancini to go for what it's worth.