Beefymcfc wrote:I'd like him to stay.
PeterParker wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:I'd like him to stay.
Then he will stay.
Im_Spartacus wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:PeterParker wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:PeterParker wrote:I really don't understand him, he played almost 120 games for us in 4 years, in a simple math, that means almost 30 games per season from 38 games in the league.
Dave has 148. If that is not regular football time, i don't know what is, really now. Hope he will stay, we really need him.
Many of those were sub appearances and I don't think you are using a number that is only prem matches, are you?
I thought he would have signed by now. If he doesn't sign we can't sell him as others have suggested. He can walk for free and perhaps command a ridiculous salary because he has no transfer fee.
I like him. I don't love him. If he decides to leave then thanks for the effort bro. Good luck.
No, that is overall, not just the PM. It has the Chums League, Cups, etc, but the same goes with Silva too. 120 vs 148.
Silva tho is kicked to death and misses a fair amount due to injury. Whereas James is rarely unfit.
I'm belaboring your point tho...which is valid. He's seen plenty of match time.
Cheers
We've played probably 200 games in that time in all competitions possibly over 220 so he has probably featured in less than 60% which is a criminal underuse of a player who could really player every week on merit. However it would be unfair to compare his ratio of games under Mancini, to the trust he now seems to be enjoying under Pellegrini thus season.
sheblue wrote:Rogers banging on about him on sky how great jim is bla bla bla.....
sheblue wrote:Rogers banging on about him on sky how great jim is bla bla bla.....
blues2win wrote:Couple of stories about James in tomorrow's papers. The Mail say City are confident Milner will sign a new contract. By contrast, and worryingly, the Times says Milner has told team mates he sees little chance of staying with City taking the view that it's take or leave it on the latest contract offer.
Tokyo Blue wrote:blues2win wrote:Couple of stories about James in tomorrow's papers. The Mail say City are confident Milner will sign a new contract. By contrast, and worryingly, the Times says Milner has told team mates he sees little chance of staying with City taking the view that it's take or leave it on the latest contract offer.
So which one of his team-mates has bleated to the press?
Milner gets on well with Manuel Pellegrini, City’s manager, but there is no escaping the fact that he is frustrated with the amount of playing time that he has had under the Chilean and Roberto Mancini before that. Although Milner has featured more regularly this season – he has started 11 Premier League games compared to 12 in the whole of the previous campaign – he is aware that injuries to key players, including Samir Nasri, Yaya Touré and David Silva, have helped his cause at times. When everyone is fit, Milner knows he is not a mandatory pick and is more likely to find himself on the bench.
Being substituted at half-time on Sunday, in the 2-0 home defeat against Arsenal, was a big disappointment and will have done nothing to allay concerns about how he is viewed at City, especially as Nasri was injured for that match and Touré away at the Africa Cup of Nations.
Pellegrini has spoken warmly about Milner’s attributes on plenty of occasions and often expressed his wish to hold onto the player. Yet there was bemusement among Milner’s camp when the City manager intimated earlier this month that an agreement between the club and player was imminent. “I hope that James will stay here and he will sign his contract in the next few days,” Pellegrini said following the 1-1 draw at Everton.
Despite regular and amicable talks with City, the bottom line is that Milner has never been close to signing . Furthermore, while it is likely that the two sides will get together again soon, there are no further discussions scheduled to take place. Perhaps most significantly, it is hard to see how City can satisfy Milner’s desire to be starting more matches.
While the prospect of playing abroad is appealing, and the formal offer that has been tabled in the past fortnight from a top European club has provided serious food for thought, Milner has more to take into consideration since becoming a father last year and it may well be that he arrives at the decision that the timing is not right to venture overseas.
All of which will encourage Arsenal and Liverpool – Chelsea tried to sign Milner when he joined City from Villa but are not believed to be interested this time round – that there is a golden opportunity to pick up an England international, still under 30, on a free transfer in less than six months’ time.
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:It's not about more playing time. He has had plenty. It's a shame but I expect him to go.
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:It's not about more playing time. He has had plenty. It's a shame but I expect him to go.
DoomMerchant wrote:Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:It's not about more playing time. He has had plenty. It's a shame but I expect him to go.
Why.dont.we.flog him now then?
DoomMerchant wrote:Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:It's not about more playing time. He has had plenty. It's a shame but I expect him to go.
Why.dont.we.flog him now then?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bear60, Bluemoon4610, blues2win and 527 guests