sheblue wrote:Of course what he said is correct, but hardly anything new. And will it change? No chance.
"And the 'new' clubs - I call them 'new' clubs, those with new investment....Chelsea is not an old, historical, huge club."
Goaters 103 wrote:No shit Jose.
We did tell you this on here 2 years ago.
Correct me from wrong but weren't WBA the only other PL team to see through FFP for what it was and vote against it?
Goaters 103 wrote:No shit Jose.
We did tell you this on here 2 years ago.
Correct me from wrong but weren't WBA the only other PL team to see through FFP for what it was and vote against it?
john@staustell wrote:Goaters 103 wrote:No shit Jose.
We did tell you this on here 2 years ago.
Correct me from wrong but weren't WBA the only other PL team to see through FFP for what it was and vote against it?
As stated above it was neck and neck. Now the idiocies are more plain for all to see I suspect a vote now would go against it.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Do we really believe that they were that naive and short sighted?
The Etihad deal was declared as a non related party sponsorship and accepted as such by international accounting standards. That was a few years back now so why would the accountants at the likes of Chelsea or Arsenal believe that UEFA could have the authority to declare it a related party sponsorship?
If they did they are fucking morons of the highest order.
By the way, are we sure Roman and Jose are on the same wavelength here? Or is Jose just having a moan to the media because Roman is telling him the purse strings have to be tightened?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carl_feedthegoat, carolina-blue, CTID Hants, Majestic-12 [Bot], MIAMCFC, nottsblue, Outcast, patrickblue, rosbif cuisson 'bleu' and 474 guests