ruralblue wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:halnone wrote:don't think he was guilty in the firs place
based on hearing all the evidence i presume?
Well known that a Jury only hears 2/3rds of Amy case and the rest is political argument and brokering deals. Only people who will truly ever know what happened are this who were in that room. Yet when someone torally proclaims innocence and sticks with their version of events all along then it casts an element of doubt to both sides.
Following that logic, practically every guilty verdict is doubtful. It's up to his defence team to make sure anything that casts doubt on his conviction comes out in open court. Prisons are full of people who, if not protesting their innocence, make excuses for their behaviour or minimise their crime ("I might be a rapist, but I'm not a paedo, so I'm not so bad after all.")
There are many crimes where the punishment doesn't end with the serving of the sentence. Would you be happy if a convicted fraudster was handling your pension?
Sorry lads (and I'm guessing it's all lads), I don't see why footballers are special.