Page 1 of 1
How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:17 pmby Fidel Castro
Firstly, he shouldn't even have started. So fuck you, Manuel!
Secondly, he injured himself. There was absolutely no reason to go to ground. If he had stayed on his feet, nothing would've happened. Serves him right in a way, but he has weakened our team ahead of derby weekend and it is the team and us, the fans, that will suffer for it whilst he is sat on his arse picking up a fat pay cheque. All cos he fell over like a big girls blouse.
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:27 pmby nottsblue
Injuries happen. It's part and parcel of the game. If he hadn't played last night he might just have easily done it in training. Or in the Derby.
It's not ideal preparation but at least it gave Nasri some game time and if he plays instead of Silva, at least he has had a bit of match practice.
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:28 pmby Nickyboy
He was tripped from behind whilst running you tool.
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:35 pmby Nigels Tackle
Nickyboy wrote:He was tripped from behind whilst running you tool.
no he wasn't
he was nudged in the back and went over to win the freekick
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 7:29 pmby Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
Rumour suggesting he could be out for 3 weeks.
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 7:46 pmby failsworthblue
Should have been nowhere that side last night , heart sank driving to the game as soon as I heard the team.
MP f***ked up big time and very prickly in his response on GMR when asked that question.
He is our best player and we play like a pub team without him.
Stuart Pearce and Samaras all over again , nothing changes!
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:13 pmby Fidel Castro
Nickyboy wrote:He was tripped from behind whilst running you tool.
No he wasn't. You doorknob.
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:27 pmby sheblue
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Rumour suggesting he could be out for 3 weeks.
Typical, just typical.
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:29 pmby South Stand Balti
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Rumour suggesting he could be out for 3 weeks.
Mirror reporting ligament damage has shown up in today's scan.
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:18 pmby Nickyboy
Fidel Castro wrote:Nickyboy wrote:He was tripped from behind whilst running you tool.
No he wasn't. You doorknob.
Doorknob... love it!
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:22 pmby Fidel Castro
Nickyboy wrote:Fidel Castro wrote:Nickyboy wrote:He was tripped from behind whilst running you tool.
No he wasn't. You doorknob.
Doorknob... love it!
The great thing is, doorbell works as an insult as well!
Re: How unnecessary was Silva's injury?
Posted:
Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:42 pmby Nigels Tackle
Fidel Castro wrote:Nickyboy wrote:Fidel Castro wrote:Nickyboy wrote:He was tripped from behind whilst running you tool.
No he wasn't. You doorknob.
Doorknob... love it!
The great thing is, doorbell works as an insult as well!
doorstop